What about Tremaine Edmunds at #5?

[OraleBroncos]

With the Cravens trade, I think that takes us out of either Fitzpatrick or James at #5. If we don't trade back, I would not mind seeing Edmunds at #5. We would not need to use a safety to cover tight ends, or even slot receivers as Edmunds could cover the middle of the field. I was leaning towards G Nelson at #5, but I think Edmunds would contribute immediately to our defense, and filling one of the weak spots on this defense.

[dipablo]

Would love to get him, just not sure if hes worth the #5 pick

[CanDB]

Edmunds is Daniel Jeremiah's 3rd top player in the draft. He states:

"Edmunds has a unique blend of size, length and athleticism. He primarily lines up off the line of scrimmage, but does get some work rushing off the edge. Against the run, he is quick to key, fill and finish as a tackler. He has rare lateral range and collects tackles from sideline to sideline. The former Hokie flashes the ability to shoot his hands and play off blocks, but this is one area where he can improve. Against the pass, he easily mirrors running backs and tight ends; there are even examples of him matching up and redirecting vs. slot receivers. He offers tremendous upside as an edge rusher, where he can dip/rip and bend around the edge. Overall, Edmunds has All-Pro ability. His upside is outrageous."

The only question...do we need O before D in the draft? I think we need both but lean towards O.... but this guy would be a great add to a D that has slid a wee bit.

[Rancid]

Considering just how terrible the O-line is, the lack of a play-making RB, and the age of our top-2 receivers how could offense not be a priority?

[OraleBroncos]

Considering just how terrible the O-line is, the lack of a play-making RB, and the age of our top-2 receivers how could offense not be a priority?

That is what I was thinking about as well. It would be hard to pass up this type of talent though, and that also fills a need. I do agree we have to find a RB, OL and a WR in this draft. Those needs though I do address in my mock (that I have not posted yet).

[MarshallMoss]

With the Cravens trade, I think that takes us out of either Fitzpatrick or James at #5. If we don't trade back, I would not mind seeing Edmunds at #5. We would not need to use a safety to cover tight ends, or even slot receivers as Edmunds could cover the middle of the field. I was leaning towards G Nelson at #5, but I think Edmunds would contribute immediately to our defense, and filling one of the weak spots on this defense.

I love him, but where would he play? We have starters:

Ray, Marshall, Davis and Miller

[fraguela09]

Trade back with BUF and take Smith or Edmunds then a DT like Vita or Payne or a OL like Hernandez or McGlinchy.

I think this is better than staying put, unless you get a QB (Allen, Darnold or Baker).

[TheAsianPA]

Tremaine Edmunds if drafted would probably take the role that Walker was put at last season at OLB behind Miller. I do think our pass rush has good playmakers, so a pick #5 would better help the offense which is lacking in talent.

[CanDB]

Trade back with BUF and take Smith or Edmunds then a DT like Vita or Payne or a OL like Hernandez or McGlinchy.

I think this is better than staying put, unless you get a QB (Allen, Darnold or Baker).

This is well discussed, but I would luv for Buffalo to come calling....Edmunds or Smith and an Oliner.....then an RB and CB in round two.

[fraguela09]

Me2... if we decide not to grab a QB, we could go grab 2 instant starters in the first and then use next 2 picks to take a RB and WR to bolster offense in the second...

[Diggs4]

Can someone help me.
I've watched all his games available on YouTube and he doesn't consistently stand out..he does make a few plays a game but he isn't jumping out on a series by series basis.

I get attraction to his measurables, but do you take someone at #5 on potential ?

Feel free to direct me to someone examples and maybe time stamps of consistent play that makes him a top 10 guy.

[Rancid]

Can someone help me.
I've watched all his games available on YouTube and he doesn't consistently stand out..he does make a few plays a game but he isn't jumping out on a series by series basis.

I get attraction to his measurables, but do you take someone at #5 on potential ?

Feel free to direct me to someone examples and maybe time stamps of consistent play that makes him a top 10 guy.

Not much to help with because there is a post about almost every player in the draft someone posts about then 10-people 'rabble...rabble...rabble'. None of it means anything, so it might be easier to ignore.

In fact, you could make up a name and post about it and I will bet someone will say they watched tape on the name you made up and they like/dislike him.

[Diggs4]

Not much to help with because there is a post about almost every player in the draft someone posts about then 10-people 'rabble...rabble...rabble'. None of it means anything, so it might be easier to ignore.

In fact, you could make up a name and post about it and I will bet someone will say they watched tape on the name you made up and they like/dislike him.

Lol probably so...

[MHOC]

I know mason is high on him and said he would draft him over Chubb

[mile high mad man]

Trade back with BUF and take Smith or Edmunds then a DT like Vita or Payne or a OL like Hernandez or McGlinchy.

I think this is better than staying put, unless you get a QB (Allen, Darnold or Baker).

I like this idea best !’n We could also select Sony Michele at 40 and O’Neal at 53. There is so many different ways The we could get 4 impact players with these picks ! 2 of them with 5th year options!