Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bleacher report says we should acquire ryan this year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by CanDB View Post
    If this was just for this year, with a much lower offer from us, it might actually have some merit. Ryan is good enough to get the ball to our talented group of receivers, and could actually take us further than the 2 gents we have now. But the compensation factor has to be significantly downsized. Maybe a QB and a lesser draft pick. Maybe. It comes down to how far could he realistically take us, and then factor in the trade value. Different draft value depending on the QB we give up. Again, it's a one year, get us to the playoffs deal.
    Remember, most of the folks who gauge the league state how good our roster is, and then rank us in the lower level of the league. They seem to be saying, you look very good, but you need a QB for us to believe in you. Is this surprising to anyone?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by CanDB View Post

      Remember, most of the folks who gauge the league state how good our roster is, and then rank us in the lower level of the league. They seem to be saying, you look very good, but you need a QB for us to believe in you. Is this surprising to anyone?
      No offense but i dont care what the folks say. The timing of that piece saying we need to spend 2 1sts and lock right at the end of training camp seems like a click bait piece. Yes ryan is good but im not spending a 3rd or higher plus lock when ryans contract is a bazillion dollars. Yes we have capspace but look at who we may need/want to resign next year. You need that high draft capitol for the turnover alone let alone the money for fa.

      no to any kind of meatloaf. I want to see this team develop a qb for once in a few decades.
      Glen Haven Fire

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by armedequation View Post

        No offense but i dont care what the folks say. The timing of that piece saying we need to spend 2 1sts and lock right at the end of training camp seems like a click bait piece. Yes ryan is good but im not spending a 3rd or higher plus lock when ryans contract is a bazillion dollars. Yes we have capspace but look at who we may need/want to resign next year. You need that high draft capitol for the turnover alone let alone the money for fa.

        no to any kind of meatloaf. I want to see this team develop a qb for once in a few decades.
        That's cool. I just think that people who analyze the sport see our QBs as a bit of a problem, and therefore come up with possible solutions. I certainly would not spend much on Ryan. But he is definitely ranked ahead of our current guys, which is possibly why this sort of suggestion makes a little bit of sense....but only at the right price. I see it as a "one year window" that they believe could advance what is certainly respected as a good team overall....just lacking in a solid leader.

        Comment


        • #19
          After his game today, the Falcons would have to give up draft picks just to move Ryan. His arm looked shot, 10 yard routes were taking forever for the ball to get there. I think Slay took pity on him on one play because he had an easy pick that probably would’ve been 6 but he opted just to bat the ball down.

          Comment


          • #20
            Doing what?!

            Comment


            • #21
              NFL.com is saying the Falcons and the Broncos should be smart and construct a trade for Matt Ryan. The discussion is in the video between James Jones and Adam Rank, in their dream trade scenarios for 2021. The other trade discussed was of OBJ to the Pack.

              Will the Buccaneers take action before the trade deadline in an effort to repair a depleted secondary? Do the Jets cut their losses and deal Marcus Maye? Kevin Patra identifies 10 buyers and sellers ahead of the 2021 NFL trade deadline.

              Comment


              • #22
                While Ryan is clearly an upgrade over Bridgewater, I don’t know that he can cover all the other deficiencies in Denver.
                My Opinion isn’t determined by what the Popular Opinion is. Sometimes I agree with the Majority, Sometimes I Don’t. If My Opinion is Different than Yours, I have to Ask One Question:
                You Mad Bro?
                Don’t Be A Mean Girl
                Hell No!!! To the Texans Quarterback!!!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by armedequation View Post
                  I laughed a lot so i had to share:

                  we get : qb matt ryan

                  we give up: 2 firsts and drew lock

                  are you laughing like i did?
                  Absolutely a joke proposal. I think Ryan is done and wouldn't be surprised if he retires at the end of the year unless he gets dealt to a very competitive team. That said, I "might" consider a straight trade Lock&TB for Ryan, but zero draft picks. Hahahahahahaahaha.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Paton should have gave Detroit 2 firsts for Stafford.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by CoryWinget81 View Post
                      Paton should have gave Detroit 2 firsts for Stafford.
                      I want to agree because it seems right.

                      I don’t know that Stafford could overcome Fangio and Shurmur.
                      My Opinion isn’t determined by what the Popular Opinion is. Sometimes I agree with the Majority, Sometimes I Don’t. If My Opinion is Different than Yours, I have to Ask One Question:
                      You Mad Bro?
                      Don’t Be A Mean Girl
                      Hell No!!! To the Texans Quarterback!!!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by broncolee View Post

                        I want to agree because it seems right.

                        I don’t know that Stafford could overcome Fangio and Shurmur.
                        Yeah that seems true. I can't discount the year he is having, but the Rams seem to be doing a lot of things better than us offensively. Denver is not just missing wide open receivers.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by CoryWinget81 View Post
                          Paton should have gave Detroit 2 firsts for Stafford.
                          IIRC we were high on Stafford and made enquiries but we simply couldn't compete with the package the Rams offered.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by armedequation View Post
                            I laughed a lot so i had to share:

                            we get : qb matt ryan

                            we give up: 2 firsts and drew lock

                            are you laughing like i did?
                            Sooner or later I hope people realize "Denver should get (insert QB name here)" is just a way lazy media people try to earn their paychecks in this new media day and age when clicks = doing good job.

                            These stories will be written and "reposted" to look credible because it feeds the media machine.

                            They are fun to discuss just hope people realize the low level of credibility. I got a lot of friends and we do fun theory games with sports. I do not need media people to steer my theory games. I try to get better quality of information from the internet. I know it is not easy.
                            Time to build on the win and grow the team from some solid play higher level of play

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X