Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lets talk about the Seahawks...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jcdavey
    replied
    Originally posted by Blazindro
    How did we get owned? Yes we lost, but "owned?" I'd be shocked at this point if the Chargers beat the Colts as well.
    you'd have to be even more retarded than the guy who thinks we missed VJ and LT and MM today, to say you'd be surprised that a sd team beats the colts


    damn that's just possibly the stupidest post of the decade lol


    i mean if i was retarded as you i'd say the broncos sure missed alphonso smith and jay cutler today ...just stupid

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by jcdavey
    you didn't play them in seattle, cause you know you would have lost there lol

    hell i'm the only person on cmb AND this board who picked seattle this week


    that's funny
    you jinxed us!!!!! lol

    actually, a couple broncos fans did pick Seattle to beat us.

    cp to you for the right picks.

    Leave a comment:


  • 12and4
    replied
    broncos didn't get owned, idk if you were watching the game or not but we just made so many mistakes in crucial moments... we had this game if it weren't for a couple calls that didn't go our way....


    i guess you guys can say the same, and thats how football is i guess...

    Leave a comment:


  • Blazindro
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet
    not when our team has proven to be able to do it for the past couple years? you somehow thought that because we lost the game that means our offense was not potent, i called you out on it and you come back with this?

    dude, you didn't see the game....you didn't see our ST coverage basically lose that game for us when we came back from 17 down and tie it in the second half, only to have the ST's throw it away on the following kick off.

    hilarious when you donk fans were glued to the TV set watching your team get owned and think you know what happened in our game.
    How did we get owned? Yes we lost, but "owned?" I'd be shocked at this point if the Chargers beat the Colts as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • DishWater
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet
    not when our team has proven to be able to do it for the past couple years? you somehow thought that because we lost the game that means our offense was not potent, i called you out on it and you come back with this?

    dude, you didn't see the game....you didn't see our ST coverage basically lose that game for us when we came back from 17 down and tie it in the second half, only to have the ST's throw it away on the following kick off.

    hilarious when you donk fans were glued to the TV set watching your team get owned and think you know what happened in our game.
    No. I was making light of your recent comments and the score of the game (20) because you delusional SD fans seem to think your offense is potent.

    Well, we put up more points on the chickens than you did, and our Qb threw for as many yards this week against a much better secondary.

    Don't forget that Trufant was out for the entire second half.

    That was when Rivers threw for all his yards.

    Remember???

    Point is we both suck right now...

    Leave a comment:


  • chazoe60
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet
    not when our team has proven to be able to do it for the past couple years? you somehow thought that because we lost the game that means our offense was not potent, i called you out on it and you come back with this?

    dude, you didn't see the game....you didn't see our ST coverage basically lose that game for us when we came back from 17 down and tie it in the second half, only to have the ST's throw it away on the following kick off.

    hilarious when you donk fans were glued to the TV set watching your team get owned and think you know what happened in our game.
    We had more yards than the Colts. It wasn't ownership as much as it was charity. Maybe you should have watched our game before you commented on it, or does it only work one way?

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by Hoserman117
    Or maybe Rivers going 0-fer in the final 2 red zone possessions.
    yeah, that was clearly the reason why we lost. did you see the drive before that when he toed the game? when ST's just threw the game away right after that?

    oh that's right, too busy watching your team get thrashed.

    Leave a comment:


  • jcdavey
    replied
    Originally posted by Hoserman117
    Lol.

    27-20 L < 31-14 W

    Thanks for making our division look weak.
    you didn't play them in seattle, cause you know you would have lost there lol

    hell i'm the only person on cmb AND this board who picked seattle this week


    that's funny

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by DishWater
    Our QB threw for as many yards as yours.

    Does that make our O potent??
    not when our team has proven to be able to do it for the past couple years? you somehow thought that because we lost the game that means our offense was not potent, i called you out on it and you come back with this?

    dude, you didn't see the game....you didn't see our ST coverage basically lose that game for us when we came back from 17 down and tie it in the second half, only to have the ST's throw it away on the following kick off.

    hilarious when you donk fans were glued to the TV set watching your team get owned and think you know what happened in our game.

    Leave a comment:


  • DishWater
    replied
    Originally posted by Hoserman117
    Or maybe Rivers going 0-fer in the final 2 red zone possessions.
    No kidding.

    Rivers is a great QB but good lord, that one throw to Gates in the endzone reminded me of my little sister attempting to throw a basketball. What a god-awful motion...

    Leave a comment:


  • Hoserman117
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet
    last time i checked, Jackson doesn't play on ST's

    you didn't see the game, don't pretend that you did.

    this loss is 90% on ST's

    the chargers offense destroyed the seahags in the second half, they came back and tied it only to let the ST's give up their second kick return for a TD of the day.

    pathetic!
    Or maybe Rivers going 0-fer in the final 2 red zone possessions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Blazindro
    replied
    Originally posted by GridironChamp
    The Brown win is just that, just a win.

    I liked the SD one because its a big divisional game and didnt know what to expect..

    But that Frisco game was pure domination in every football related aspect. Besides
    a cheap late TD in which Singletary should feel lucky for only getting one starter
    hurt, we completely shut down any offensive attempt by SF. Crennel looks like a
    mastermind, while Weis is either limited by Cassel's ineptness or isn't as good as
    a lot of people thought.
    And that is impressive, but if I am being honest, at the very least Denver and San Diego should dominate the 49ers as well and maybe the Raiders. I want to see wins against quality opponents for the Chiefs and not a dominating outting against lesser opponents. I really shouldn't slam the Chiefs because they are doing well and the only team doing anything worth a damn in the division, but would like to see a repeat performance against a quality team like the Colts.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheChiefs
    replied
    Originally posted by chazoe60
    It's called exaggerating. You know, like when you say the Broncos went 0-5 on redzone attempts today.

    Oh wait, maybe I wasn't having a nightmare after all.
    Errrr, never know with you Colorado fans...

    Originally posted by Beagle
    You have been absent for going on 5 years wb I guess? Fair weather much?
    lol sour grapes? Ive been around...Not much smack to talk though, when your team only manages to win 10 games in 3 years.

    That, and I lead a very busy life style! (something I dont expect someone with 8000+ posts would understand.)

    Leave a comment:


  • DevilSpawn
    replied
    The win doesn't shock me too much because of the 12th man. HOW it happened is the bigger shock.

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by BeardedWonder
    SEACHICKENS LOLLLLLL

    thats amazing. missing VJ and LT yet?
    last time i checked, Jackson doesn't play on ST's

    you didn't see the game, don't pretend that you did.

    this loss is 90% on ST's

    the chargers offense destroyed the seahags in the second half, they came back and tied it only to let the ST's give up their second kick return for a TD of the day.

    pathetic!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎