Originally posted by BayAreaFBFan
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chiefs fans
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by BayAreaFBFan View PostKC needs some competent WRs that can catch the ball. Too many big plays left on the field.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by RF14 View PostA lot of drops from their WR's.
Leave a comment:
-
How good does it feel to beat them in their own building in December, when everyone says we can't?
GOOD JOB BOYS!!!
GO BRONCOS!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sstoner View PostYou played a good game...but....
We beat you twice.........away with you!
Leave a comment:
-
KC fans....
You played a good game...but....
We beat you twice.........away with you!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 58Miller View Post1. 23 pts is lighting someone up ? (they scored 2 tds and kicked 3 field goals)
Denver has scored 49 against Baltimore the leagues 8th ranked team in pts allowed.
2. Campbell, Weeden it doesn't matter those guys are both not top 20 QB's in the NFl period. Campbell did have to start his first game of the season in Arrowhead which I think is just as bad as playing in Seattle.
We bring up the back up Qb's to compare them to Peyton, but you guys all think Peyton is the same as:
Keenum (in his first start at Arrowhead)
Campbell
Gabbert
Pryor
Vick (I bet Reid didn't know how to defend him well)
Tuel ( first career start)
Peyton can read defenses better than any QB in the league, he can see blitzes and make teams pay, the list of future hall of famers above cannot.
The point was not that Campbell is a great QB, but that it was dumb to keep saying 'they've played back up QBs' as if it makes it especially bad. The back ups they've faced were better than the starters they replaced, or not much worse.
The Chiefs held the Cowboys offense to 16, so obviously they can play good offenses well. Thus, it's dumb to act as though playing back up QBs is a sign they'll get lit up by Denver. Denver is a better offense than Dallas, but the point is the Cowboys are better than all the offenses with the QBs you listed, and yet they still were able to beat them and play them well. Some teams always win close, I can bring up several examples. They don't blow out bad teams, but they can still beat good ones.
The best team KC and DEN have beaten is the same team, Dallas. The idea that you have beaten such superior competition is simply ridiculous. You can talk all you want about the QBs to try and create that illusion, but what makes a team good is the record, aka the team as a whole.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fallforward3y+ View PostAnd we come again to the fact that Buffalo plays Kansas City well, and matches up well with them. That happens in the NFL sometimes.
The Browns held the Colts offense with Peyton to 3 points in 2008, and they're defense was ranked 26th. They lit up the Ravens 2nd ranked defense and also put up 24 on the Steelers first ranked defense. That's the easiest example.
The Chiefs put up 23 on the Browns, who have the 9th ranked scoring defense. Denver is 25th so I guess that means the Chiefs will light you guys up. Many times, the facts can mean whatever you want them to
This and insisting Campbell is a downgrade from Weeden, you guys have some seriously foggy homer glasses.
Denver has scored 49 against Baltimore the leagues 8th ranked team in pts allowed.
2. Campbell, Weeden it doesn't matter those guys are both not top 20 QB's in the NFl period. Campbell did have to start his first game of the season in Arrowhead which I think is just as bad as playing in Seattle.
We bring up the back up Qb's to compare them to Peyton, but you guys all think Peyton is the same as:
Keenum (in his first start at Arrowhead)
Campbell
Gabbert
Pryor
Vick (I bet Reid didn't know how to defend him well)
Tuel ( first career start)
Peyton can read defenses better than any QB in the league, he can see blitzes and make teams pay, the list of future hall of famers above cannot.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 58Miller View PostYeah I guess your o-line played well considering they gave up only 2 sacks instead of 6 like the week before against Cleveland. Von Miller is going to eat that rookie Fisher alive!!!
Buffalo held your offense to 9 pts and they are the 26th ranked defense in the league.
Denver is ranked 20th and they have the best offense in the NFL averaging 41 a game.
The Browns held the Colts offense with Peyton to 3 points in 2008, and they're defense was ranked 26th. They lit up the Ravens 2nd ranked defense and also put up 24 on the Steelers first ranked defense. That's the easiest example.
The Chiefs put up 23 on the Browns, who have the 9th ranked scoring defense. Denver is 25th so I guess that means the Chiefs will light you guys up. Many times, the facts can mean whatever you want them to
This and insisting Campbell is a downgrade from Weeden, you guys have some seriously foggy homer glasses.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 58_VONDOOM_92 View PostI like how you make it sound like 28 points on the road against a rival is bad. The most points the chiefs have scored is 31 points while we are avg 41!
If this game was in Arrowhead then I would be more worried but being at Mile High PM and our high octane O will wear down that D. We'll see though anything can happen
And since when is scoring 28 points, bad?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BayAreaFBFan View PostWell if your team was able to put up only 28 pts against a mediocre at best San Diego defense and the Chiefs average in the low to mid 20's in scoring then how is it not possible for KC to come away with a win when you add in a superb defense and your team having pass protection issues with a QB suffering ankle issues?
If this game was in Arrowhead then I would be more worried but being at Mile High PM and our high octane O will wear down that D. We'll see though anything can happen
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: