Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Broncos are Imploding....are you kidding me Denver? You suck!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #87Birdman
    replied
    Originally posted by bgpatsfan
    Nah I am pretty content, you still haven't clearly countered my observation that "many" NFL players with exemptions is clearly disproportionate to the 4% of the population that you state need to use adderall.

    Lol yeah I do feel sorry for you, do you really think I care what you say? Literally you couldn't disprove what I said about adderall exemptions so you resorted to questioning my intelligence. You are clearly doing this in an attempt to attack my credibility in attempt to boost your own. Doesn't work that way bro.

    But I mean if you feel important from making personal attacks on the internet, more power to you.
    Didn't you claim earlier that most players didn't even know it was a banned drug. Yet here you are using that many have exempts to use it. So which one is it? People don't know it is banned or many have exempts to use it?

    Leave a comment:


  • TommyBrady12
    replied
    Originally posted by 58Miller
    Foxboro or Denver either way the Broncos will be the more battle tested team. They will have played on the road already in Seattle, Foxboro , and Cincy. I'm glad Denver has the second hardest schedule. Oakland's schedule is more difficult because they play the Broncos twice!
    Peyton has as much trouble in foxboro as brady does in denver

    Leave a comment:


  • 58Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by TommyBrady12
    What's great about next year is the pats schedule is easier than denver. We play the NFC north while you guys play the NFC west lol. This means if both teams make it to the AFC championship it will be in foxboro.
    Foxboro or Denver either way the Broncos will be the more battle tested team. They will have played on the road already in Seattle, Foxboro , and Cincy. I'm glad Denver has the second hardest schedule. Oakland's schedule is more difficult because they play the Broncos twice!

    Leave a comment:


  • TommyBrady12
    replied
    What's great about next year is the pats schedule is easier than denver. We play the NFC north while you guys play the NFC west lol. This means if both teams make it to the AFC championship it will be in foxboro.

    Leave a comment:


  • kishzilla
    replied
    Originally posted by bgpatsfan
    I also love the fact how you are taking shots at Browner's character, but are overlooking the fact that Von was busted for the very same thing and has failed more drug tests/had much more serious transgressions since entering the league.
    Do you see me defending Miller? If I was in here trying to suggest that because Miller could get a prescription for Marijuana in Colorado for some bogus reason that he got some Doc of ill-repute to go ahead with, he should be allowed to smoke it anyway, and everybody should just shut up about it, in spite of the fact that the league says he can't, then, and only then, would I look and sound like you do in your posts in this thread.

    Doesn't that sound pretty stupid to you?

    Yeah, I bet you love every bit of that. You just love it to pieces.
    Last edited by kishzilla; 04-30-2014, 10:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • kishzilla
    replied
    Originally posted by bgpatsfan
    Nah I am pretty content, you still haven't clearly countered my observation that "many" NFL players with exemptions is clearly disproportionate to the 4% of the population that you state need to use adderall.

    Lol yeah I do feel sorry for you, do you really think I care what you say? Literally you couldn't disprove what I said about adderall exemptions so you resorted to questioning my intelligence. You are clearly doing this in an attempt to attack my credibility in attempt to boost your own. Doesn't work that way bro.

    But I mean if you feel important from making personal attacks on the internet, more power to you.
    You dedicated the majority of that post to whining. Yeah, I'd say you care

    Leave a comment:


  • kishzilla
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Bojangles
    I'm not an expert on steroids, so why don't you explain all those legit reasons why a person might need them in order to play, other than the obvious strength-building and tissue regeneration?
    Certain forms of anemia, osteoporosis, and hereditary angiodema are all treated by anabolic steroids.

    But that's not the point. The point is, just because a legitimate reason exists, doesn't mean it's not being abused, and I think it's pretty obvious that there is abuse going on.

    Are you suggesting that any player who suffers from ADD or ADHD should be disqualified from a career in professional sports, solely because of the medication they may require?
    You have quite the imagination. I didn't suggest, imply, or make apparent in any way shape or form that what you just suggested was what I was getting at.

    Nice try at the straw-man though lol

    Isn't that a bit like the anti-gun crowd insisting that the only way to end gun violence is to take the firearms away from all of us?
    Actually it's more like, "Hey, that athlete was taking amphetamines and didn't even try to get an exemption for it. He was probably taking it for nefarious reasons".

    You New Englanders have a severe lack of common sense. I think the smell of your own bull crap has rotted out that portion of your brains.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgpatsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by 58Miller
    If both Browner and Von were Free Agents which one would you want New England to sign?
    Off the field questions aside, Von and its not even close.

    Drug/Legal Issues considered, Browner. He will not cost nearly as much as Von and I think I would trust Browner more; I have not seen one ounce of remorse from Von that he was suspended and remember how he wouldn't guarantee he would never get in trouble again. Add in the rest of the traffic ticket/court issues and Von just doesn't convince me that he has his life in order. I would not trust him giving him a 10+ million a year contract.

    Leave a comment:


  • bgpatsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by kishzilla
    Nothing more needed to say.



    No you don't. You feel sorry for yourself, and got butthurt about what someone said about you on the internet that doesn't even know you.

    Poorly organized lines of logic. Feathers ruffled easily. A real catch lol
    Nah I am pretty content, you still haven't clearly countered my observation that "many" NFL players with exemptions is clearly disproportionate to the 4% of the population that you state need to use adderall.

    Lol yeah I do feel sorry for you, do you really think I care what you say? Literally you couldn't disprove what I said about adderall exemptions so you resorted to questioning my intelligence. You are clearly doing this in an attempt to attack my credibility in attempt to boost your own. Doesn't work that way bro.

    But I mean if you feel important from making personal attacks on the internet, more power to you.

    Leave a comment:


  • 58Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by bgpatsfan

    I also love the fact how you are taking shots at Browner's character, but are overlooking the fact that Von was busted for the very same thing and has failed more drug tests/had much more serious transgressions since entering the league.
    If both Browner and Von were Free Agents which one would you want New England to sign?

    Leave a comment:


  • ManningRules
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr Bojangles
    HaHaHa and a Ho-dee-ho-ho!

    Wow.....can you imagine...Having to play in the pouring rain! I guess I should doff my cap to your icon. maybe the League should erect a statue or something for that wondrous feat!

    As a big fan, I'm sure you still get down on your knees at night and thank the Almighty that He saw fit to get the lowly Bears, the worst team to ever grace a SB venue, to the NFC Championship, that season. Otherwise, your boy would, most likely, be 0-3 in the Big Game and threatening Jim Kelley's record string!

    Darn, don't things get so much tougher in the postseason than they are in the regular? That's a real shame.

    BTW...I assume that you moved from Ft Wayne to Colorado, after your hero bailed on the Colts, and left you lost, confused and depressed. But hopefully, your move will be rewarded with another title, after a rather shaky start in Denver's playoff opportunities, if the Fates can arrange another miracle like the Bears to line up against!

    Weather "didn't bother him as much as of lately" .....are you kidding, or did you not watch the regular season Broncos-Patriots game last season?


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Let me guess... If the Patsies would have somehow pulled off a miracle and beat the best QB in the league during the AFC Championship game then all we would hear would be how "great" Tommy Boy is and how he has 4 rings and how he's the SB MVP for beating the Bears in a thunderstorm... huh?

    And maybe you haven't noticed but the last time I checked Peyton doesn't play in a dome anymore. I might be wrong but I think Peyton destroyed Brady's TD record and set all kinds of new records last year on his way to another AFC Championship. And he did all this playing in an outdoor stadium.
    Wasn't all you Patsie fans saying the only reason he broke records was because he played in a cushy dome.
    I do believe your argument was Brady was soooooooo much better because he broke the record playing outside.
    What say you now, little buddy?

    Leave a comment:


  • Canmore
    replied
    Originally posted by Houshmazode
    The more he yaps, the bigger the hole gets.

    Leave a comment:


  • Houshmazode
    replied
    Originally posted by 58Miller
    True cause Brady needs a dominant defense to win.

    Leave a comment:


  • 58Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by TommyBrady12
    you're missing my point and that is the giants would have lost had they played our defense from 2003-2004. it has nothing to do with brady.
    True cause Brady needs a dominant defense to win.

    Leave a comment:


  • TommyBrady12
    replied
    Originally posted by 58Miller
    What does the regular season have to do with him only scoring 14 pts? You guys give him a pass? That team was built around him and he didn't show up that's why they lost.
    I don't care that the Broncos o-line was getting beat and Manning had to force throws, this team was built around him and we didn't have a chance because he had a bad game period. Same goes for Brady in his teams two losses.
    you're missing my point and that is the giants would have lost had they played our defense from 2003-2004. it has nothing to do with brady.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎