If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
seattle's blueprint last year was very similar to what new england did in 2001-2004...up and coming quarterback with average receivers and a lights out defense. seattle's D may be better than New england's but the idea was basically the same.
Seattle is more of a run focused team than the pats were. the pats were a much more balanced attack on offense than the seahawks are. i want to see what happens when the seahawks don't have an elite running back anymore, which may not be for long.
because after lynch, who do they have for a running back?
Comment