Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

All things NOT PATRIOT related...... Discuss!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    it's definitely rare that someone says something that stupid here in smack, i will give you that much

    just imagine if i ran some weak ass smack like that, then got torched for it and then tried to say i was just kidding? do you not see that you are actually the one that looks like a fool right now?

    at least bates was smart enough to exit after he knew this is a battle he was not going to win.

    i say plenty of stuff here just to get you donk fans riled up and you all take the bait constantly. the difference is, i don't need to post piss poor flame bait that i don't even believe just to do it and then say "just kidding" after i get kicked in the teeth. lol

    stand behind your smack samantha, you are going to have to step your game up or you will get dealt with, period.

    says the guy still getting kicked in the teeth for insisting a fantasy stat metric proclaiming Melvin a top ten pass rusher was legit

    or that the spin move is rare and vintage ...still cracks me up
    sigpic
    when do native Americans become human and not mascots

    Comment


    • Originally posted by atwaterandstir View Post
      I don't think you get it man........I'm one of the bros....

      Just like you, I organize my overpriced cologne collection from big to small
      And just like you I have an equally badass black t-shirt collection -that I iron.

      I would arm wrestle you anywhere, anytime and you would smell me coming from 3 blocks away.....bromie
      You'd get BrOwned in an arm wrestling match, Angelina Brolie.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by PatsFan4ever View Post
        You'd get BrOwned in an arm wrestling match, Angelina Brolie.
        Get browned is right, because you're so full of $#!%

        Ohhhhhh, snap! :dance:
        To infinity...and beyond.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Lumiere View Post
          Get browned is right, because you're so full of $#!%

          Ohhhhhh, snap! :dance:
          Why not come find out, little girl? :dance:

          Comment


          • Originally posted by PatsFan4ever View Post
            Why not come find out, little girl? :dance:
            Stop with the "internet tough guy" routine..... How about discussing something with a little substance..... It's not smack, it's trolling. Smack is great, continue that....
            sigpic

            Comment


            • Originally posted by arapaho View Post
              says the guy still getting kicked in the teeth for insisting a fantasy stat metric proclaiming Melvin a top ten pass rusher was legit

              or that the spin move is rare and vintage ...still cracks me up
              don't worry, there is plenty of teeth kicking to go around, as you found out earlier in the thread.

              http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...14#post5552114

              it's clear you have a lot to learn about pass rushers and all you know is sack numbers, that right there is the issue. you seem to think that pressure only has an effect on a play one out of 1000 times, that alone is pure comedy.

              now, go back into hiding because you just got lit up like a christmas tree and there is no stopping that inferno.
              Last edited by baphamet; 02-28-2017, 08:50 AM.
              sigpic

              Comment


              • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                don't worry, there is plenty of teeth kicking to go around, as you found out earlier in the thread.

                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...14#post5552114

                it's clear you have a lot to learn about pass rushers and all you know is sack numbers, that right there is the issue. you seem to think that pressure only has an effect on a play one out of 1000 times, that alone is pure comedy.

                now, go back into hiding because you just got lit up like a christmas tree and there is no stopping that inferno.
                you must be paul spicer...you don't stop at full blown lies...

                heres your post that started this, posting a fantasy stat metric that stated Melvin was one of the best pass rushers based of his percentage of QB pressures per def snap

                https://www.profootballfocus.com/blo...ure-frequency/

                notice ingram is on the list of the most productive pass rushers in the league last year when you ignore the amount of snaps a player has, don't only look at sacks, and just look at the % of QB pressures per snap that he actually has.

                let me know if you would like any more football education son
                here's Arapaho thinking all that matters is sacks...according to bap

                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...56#post4897156
                it can also a hell of a lot of times result in a 1st down or a td ...just like melvins pressure tonight

                heres the part you fail to grasp...a pressure...CAN CAUSE A LOSS OF DOWN OR AN INT, nobody here ever said it couldn't

                but a sack can cause a loss of down too, lost yardage and a fumble....it can almost never without penalty result in a offensive td or first down
                your insisting a pressure is better then a sack...it isn't.....UNLESS THE QB THROWS A PICK, AND A SACK DOESNT RESULT IN A FUMBLE

                what was the signature turning point in the colts comeback...was it pressure....OR THE SACK THAT RESULTED IN A COLTS FUMBLE RECOVERY

                I GAURANTEE there is more 1st downs or completed passes and or tds from qbs under pressure then there is ints

                how many tds or 1st downs are there from sacks
                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...91#post4578891
                von miller........10 sacks....63 sack yards....16 qb hits...21 tackles for loss...2 ff

                melvin...... 1/2 sack ....2 sack yards.....1 qb hit.....1 tackle for loss.....1 ff


                melvin certainly seems to be a playmaker
                how can that be ...I used more than sacks to compare the two?....weird

                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...31#post4889031

                ohh so the ....almost sacks must be a sd stat....he almost had seven sacks lmao!!

                rest of us put more impact on actual hits...tck f loss...tackles sacks.....

                tell me...if barney "almost" gets there and makes a qb step up into pocket and throws a td pass...do you bolt fans record it as a almost td?
                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...52#post4890852
                Another lie...whatta loser

                Nobody including myself ever said sacks is all you use..lmao

                And your bolt fans started this with this thread.....and YOU BROUGHT PRESSURES INTO THE DISCUSSION by insisting some fantasy stat story listed Melvin high because of...pressures per snap...fantasy stats

                We have just said pressures don't mean much if you can't get sacks and hits
                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...09#post4897509

                in that bap has insisted Melvin gets pressures so he's one of the best pass rushers...read back further if you wanna see his fantasy stat story that supposedly shows Melvin is a top ten pass rusher as a rookie


                we have refuted that notion, insisting that just because he gets some pressure, doesn't make him one of the best

                to play the position he must also produce sacks, qb hits, strips, tackles for loss, a pressure can be recorded simply by making the qb step up in the pocket...results matter...whereas bap insists pressures are better then sacks

                Melvin in his rookie yr got a few pressures...I sack...1ff...2 qb hits...4 tackles for loss

                miller in his rookie seasons...12 sacks...3 ff..24 qb hits...19 tackles for loss

                so you see miller not only got pressure...but he finished

                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...66#post4728366
                ya...i noticed melvis great "pressure" when peyton manning leaped over him


                this is your proof how great melvin was LOL

                lets look deeper

                melvin acourding to this method had a pressure 12.6% of his snaps

                jjwatt accourding to this had a pressure 13% of his snaps

                so by all rights melvin is just a tad lessor of a player than watt...right?

                unless you wanna include melvins 1 sack compared to watts 20.5


                or

                melvin had 2 qb hits
                compared to watts 46


                then your theory falls apart

                http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...71#post4728371
                lets look even further

                of those linbackes listed

                a smith....19.5 sacks....1.3% higher qbp .........30 qb hits....18 tfl
                v miller....18.5...........7% higher qbp..............24 qb hits....28 tfl
                c mathews....13..........1.2% higher qbp...........27 qb hits....17tfl
                j houston...10.........00.4% higher qbp ...........19 qb hits....13 tfl
                a spencer...11.........00.7% higher qbp.............13 qb hits...13 tfl
                d ware...11.5..........1.1% higher qbp .............20qb hits.....9 tfl

                ingram....12.6%................................... ......2 qb hits...4 tfl

                considering ingram was a situational player coming in to rush the passer


                now explain how ingram is one of the best?


                clearly baps alternative facts show I only use sacks :thumb:
                sigpic
                when do native Americans become human and not mascots

                Comment


                • Originally posted by arapaho View Post
                  you must be paul spicer...you don't stop at full blown lies...

                  heres your post that started this, posting a fantasy stat metric that stated Melvin was one of the best pass rushers based of his percentage of QB pressures per def snap



                  here's Arapaho thinking all that matters is sacks...according to bap

                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...56#post4897156

                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...91#post4578891


                  how can that be ...I used more than sacks to compare the two?....weird

                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...31#post4889031



                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...52#post4890852

                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...09#post4897509


                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...66#post4728366

                  http://forums.denverbroncos.com/show...71#post4728371




                  clearly baps alternative facts show I only use sacks :thumb:
                  i guarantee there are more int's, less TD's, and less completions when a QB is under pressure vs when not under pressure because i posted the statistical data that proves it.

                  speaking of lies, show me where i said ingram was one of the best. none of what you posted disproved anything. you are acting like i'm saying sacks don't matter, of course they do. you are acting like i'm saying ingram is elite because of the pressure he applies, never said nor implied that.

                  i said he is disruptive, which is a large reason why he is going to get paid. oh and the fact that he has a lot of sacks the last two years since being healthy.

                  who said that when healthy ingram has shown flashes of dominance? that was me and that's exactly what we witnessed last season if you payed attention like PFF and so many others have. yet you want to talk smack like i was wrong about that? lol

                  but you are absolutely comparing QB pressure to a hail mary and you are not weaseling your way out of that idiotic comment, saying that 1 out of 1000 times it doesn't have an effect on the play and that is 100% false as i showed you and everyone else reading.

                  it's a fact that pressure alone does have an effect on a QB and the play quite often and much much more often than a hail mary is completed, even if they never touch the QB. it doesn't always result in a negative play but it does quite frequently, a lot more frequently than you seem to think.
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                    [U]i guarantee there are more int's, less TD's, and less completions when a QB is under pressure vs when not under pressure because i posted the statistical data that proves it.[/U]

                    speaking of lies, show me where i said ingram was one of the best. none of what you posted disproved anything. you are acting like i'm saying sacks don't matter, of course they do. you are acting like i'm saying ingram is elite because of the pressure he applies, never said nor implied that.

                    i said he is disruptive, which is a large reason why he is going to get paid. oh and the fact that he has a lot of sacks the last two years since being healthy.

                    who said that when healthy ingram has shown flashes of dominance? that was me and that's exactly what we witnessed last season if you payed attention like PFF and so many others have. yet you want to talk smack like i was wrong about that? lol

                    but you are absolutely comparing QB pressure to a hail mary and you are not weaseling your way out of that idiotic comment, saying that 1 out of 1000 times it doesn't have an effect on the play and that is 100% false as i showed you and everyone else reading.

                    it's a fact that pressure alone does have an effect on a QB and the play quite often and much much more often than a hail mary is completed, even if they never touch the QB. it doesn't always result in a negative play but it does quite frequently, a lot more frequently than you seem to think.

                    way to completely make up a new argument on the fly paul

                    I will counter that the percentage of loss of down plays is significantly higher with a sack, vrses a pressure...you agree
                    I will also say that the number of positive plays with qb pressure...far exceeds negative plays with pressure

                    the fact is the fact...you claimed barney was a top ten pass rusher based of some fantast stat that based its judgment off of percentage of pressures per pass rush snap....

                    we countered with pressures aint everything, a pressure can be 100% ineffectual but still be recorded as one...and to judge a pass rusher we must look at results, sacks, qb hits, FF, tackles for loss

                    whereas you insisted for two years...THAT ALL WE LOOK AT IS SACKS
                    sigpic
                    when do native Americans become human and not mascots

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by arapaho View Post
                      way to completely make up a new argument on the fly paul

                      I will counter that the percentage of loss of down plays is significantly higher with a sack, vrses a pressure...you agree
                      I will also say that the number of positive plays with qb pressure...far exceeds negative plays with pressure

                      the fact is the fact...you claimed barney was a top ten pass rusher based of some fantast stat that based its judgment off of percentage of pressures per pass rush snap....

                      we countered with pressures aint everything, a pressure can be 100% ineffectual but still be recorded as one...and to judge a pass rusher we must look at results, sacks, qb hits, FF, tackles for loss

                      whereas you insisted for two years...THAT ALL WE LOOK AT IS SACKS
                      dude, PFF has him ranked as a top 10 edge defender right now

                      everything i was saying about ingram has come true. i said when healthy he is a disruptive force and we had seen "flashes" of that but he just couldn't stay healthy.

                      now the last two years he has been healthy and he has been very dominant in that time. sure he has to get better at finishing the sacks but with bosa on the other side drawing double teams, look for ingram to have another dominant season with hopefully 12+ sacks with lots of pressures and QB hits.

                      of course the last two seasons where he has been healthy, he is 7th in sacks among LB'ers. that's even considering he does sometime not finish sacks.

                      by the way, you didn't counter with pressures are not everything, you all discounted them entirely and you know it. my whole argument that entire time was you have to consider more than just sacks and you all argued with me about that.

                      pressure and being disruptive is very important to a pass rusher, not just sacks or QB hits. it's all important and i have never once argued that pressure is more important than sacks or QB hits.

                      the bottom line is you talked smack on ingram for years and he has developed into a very good player when healthy, some would argue top 10 for sure and i'm not talking about homers either.
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X