Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Game one.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by arapaho View Post
    and we were supposed to be scared...right?
    well you guys are about as clueless about the chargers as anyone possibly could be, all you know is win loss records from last year and base your opinion solely on that.

    of course you are not scared.....ignorance truly is bliss, isn't it? oh and you want to talk about players made of glass? welcome to denver charles!

    Comment


    • #92
      It's really going to be hilarious hearing your excuses this season, it really is....It'll be interesting to see the mental gymnastics you use to wiggle out of a week one loss by the "buzz saw" Chargers.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by baphamet View Post
        do what two seasons in a row? have the worst OL and have the most guys on IR over that span? that is impressive, isnt it? rivers with time and the weapons he has will lite it up.
        Excuses...that's all you have is excuses. If they were a spendable currency, you'd be bill fricken gates man...
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Beagle View Post
          First we have 3 quarterbacks and they are young.
          Secondly
          Vegas has us as eighth in the league at 18-1 odds of winning the superbowl http://www.vegasinsider.com/nfl/odds/futures/


          or here http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...2017-nfl-draft
          Oh and heree http://www.espn.com/chalk/story/_/id...super-bowl-lii
          Lie much?


          This Thread is about the Broncos and Chargers move along
          For somebody who knows so much, If he had even the slightest clue he would take a little bit of cash to Vegas and make a bet on the Broncos at that 18 to 1 odds.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by baphamet View Post
            well you guys are about as clueless about the chargers as anyone possibly could be, all you know is win loss records from last year and base your opinion solely on that.

            of course you are not scared.....ignorance truly is bliss, isn't it? oh and you want to talk about players made of glass? welcome to denver charles!
            So assuming Charles gets hurt and we still beat the Chargers in week one what would your excuse be then?

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by baphamet View Post
              do what two seasons in a row? have the worst OL and have the most guys on IR over that span? that is impressive, isnt it? rivers with time and the weapons he has will lite it up.
              the post previous to this...you claim McCoy was the cause of your losses

              and the head coach that got fired for it is now your OC giving pointers to your new rookie HC


              next post down your blaming the oline...a GM whom you claimed is better than Elway and has done more, put that OLINE together if I'm not mistaken

              then of course your incessant whiny over played sob story about injuries
              sigpic
              when do native Americans become human and not mascots

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                do what two seasons in a row? have the worst OL and have the most guys on IR over that span? that is impressive, isnt it? rivers with time and the weapons he has will lite it up.
                Until crunchtime of course......

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Sam_Z View Post
                  Dude I read the stupid article and believe me it is stupid. It doesn't matter if you're talking about winning games or choking games away it's a computer simulation for crying out loud.
                  This is worse than the pansy fans crying about Vaseline or salary cap infractions.
                  please elaborate, why is it stupid? because it says things you don't like? are you not capable of realizing how many things had to happen at the end of those games in order for those chokes to become chokes?

                  yes it does matter because it wasn't entire game simulations, it was a simulation showing the odds of them losing at certain points in the 4th quarter, you can bet on these things in vegas.

                  did you notice the part about the chargers losing two games where their odds of winning at one point in both games was 99.9%? i really don't think you are capable of comprehending what this all means.

                  It's like you will use anything to support a dogmatic argument. Nobody cares about a computer simulation, the Chargers need to go out there in win at least 10 games to be a contender. Until they do that, I don't want to hear anything about injuries or computer simulations on what if's because every team suffers from injuries.
                  no, i just don't discredit things i don't understand like you are clearly doing. you are acting like this was just a simulation of full games played, like simulating a full season and setting the odds of win totals, which is exactly what vegas does.

                  nope, that's not what that is. say the chargers are up 3 scores with 5 minutes to go in the 4th, they do a simulation millions of times to see how many times the chargers would finish out and win that game. that's what they did but they did it at points where the odds of the chargers winning those games were at their highest.

                  you are clueless, plain and simple.

                  Goodness gracious I would expect this from a pansy fan not from you.
                  your ignorance doesn't surprise me unfortunately lol

                  And yes the big dogs in Vegas make a lot of money but they make a lot of money preying on those with OCD. Obsessive compulsive disorder. No I'm not hating on these people not by any means but gambling is a serious addiction leading to being unable to resist impulses to gamble. This can lead to severe money problems, job loss, crime or fraud, and damage to family relationships. This is The only argument that serves relevance to your computer simulation, because they're true goal is to make money and they do it by preying on those with the disorder so that's all you're all argument serves a purpose for. Cheating and taking advantage of the sick.
                  you are talking to someone that works in the gambling industry, i don't gamble money for a reason (unless it's fantasy football and that's mainly for fun and only once per year)

                  the point is those simulations are very credible, it makes them money because it works, that was the point. but again, that's not what i'm talking about anyways. i'm talking about simulations at certain points of those 4 games where the chargers chances of winning was at it's highest.

                  it's not like the chargers had a 30 million to 1 chance to simply win 1 out of 4 games. that's what you seem to think this is and that's just flat out dumb and not what was being stated in the article.

                  As far as Tim Tebow and Jay Cutler go it doesn't make you a football genius for filling skepticism when they were both drafted. I think a lot of people were hyped up for Jay Cutler but there is a reason why Vince Young and Matt Leinart went before Jay Cutler.
                  jay cutler had all the physical tools, that's why people were hyped. i never said cutler was a bad player or wouldn't make it in the NFL, i just said he was a career loser and a head case, spot on accuracy.

                  tebow was the opposite, if tebow had cutlers skill and mechanics coming out of college, he would have been peyton manning 2.0

                  As for Tim Tebow any true football fan knew that he didn't have the proper football mechanics to be a quarterback. It was only the asinine people that didn't know nothing about a quarterback's throwing motion and mechanics that said give him a chance but I think we all knew he wasn't going to pan out in the NFL as a quarterback so what do you want for that one a medal?
                  you act like i wasn't here when most of you were gushing over tebow and arguing with me about my points that he didn't have what it takes to be a starting NFL QB. that includes beagle and arapaho who support anything that wears a broncos uni devoid of any real thought or reason.

                  there were a few i remember that didn't drink the kool aid, most of which follow college and saw what i did, i remember corywinget was one of them for example. yes i can remember specific people because that's how few of you there were, at least in smack.

                  point is, when people make up an number like im' wrong 99% of the time, that's clearly them lying to themselves and not even trying to hide the fact they are exaggerating.

                  that's cool though, when i end up right about the chargers this season i will just claim you are all wrong 99% of the time and call it good
                  Last edited by baphamet; 05-03-2017, 08:06 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Sam_Z View Post
                    So assuming Charles gets hurt and we still beat the Chargers in week one what would your excuse be then?
                    don't you know
                    new coach
                    new oline
                    rookies
                    not fully healed from devastating injuries, referees, ect:
                    sigpic
                    when do native Americans become human and not mascots

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by atwaterandstir View Post
                      Until crunchtime of course......
                      yes because having the worst pass blocking in the NFL and mainly scrubs to throw the ball to has no bearing on a play where rivers is 100% going to throw the football.

                      rivers over his career has been good in the 4th, just not recently due to obvious reasons you are all obvious to.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by arapaho View Post
                        don't you know
                        new coach
                        new oline
                        rookies
                        not fully healed from devastating injuries, referees, ect:
                        lol is that why i made a thread saying there will be none?

                        the chargers would have to have the same injury woes, same 30 million to 1 bad luck, same terrible OL that was only better than maybe seattle's OL and thats arguable.

                        you have made excuses and blamed losses directly on injuries before, except you were crying about losing 3 RB's, that's it. the chargers have lost their top 3 backs for the season multiple times in the last 3 years alone, last year they lost their top 4 backs and top 3 out of 5 WR's including their top 2 offensive playmakers week 1 and 2 of the season.

                        yet nothing but crickets.........something doesn't add up there.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                          please elaborate, why is it stupid? because it says things you don't like? are you not capable of realizing how many things had to happen at the end of those games in order for those chokes to become chokes?

                          yes it does matter because it wasn't entire game simulations, it was a simulation showing the odds of them losing at certain points in the 4th quarter, you can bet on these things in vegas.

                          did you notice the part about the chargers losing two games where their odds of winning at one point in both games was 99.9%? i really don't think you are capable of comprehending what this all means.



                          no, i just don't discredit things i don't understand like you are clearly doing. you are acting like this was just a simulation of full games played, like simulating a full season and setting the odds of win totals, which is exactly what vegas does.

                          nope, that's not what that is. say the chargers are up 3 scores with 5 minutes to go in the 4th, they do a simulation millions of times to see how many times the chargers would finish out and win that game. that's what they did but they did it at points where the odds of the chargers winning those games were at their highest.

                          you are clueless, plain and simple.



                          your ignorance doesn't surprise me unfortunately lol



                          you are talking to someone that works in the gambling industry, i don't gamble money for a reason (unless it's fantasy football and that's mainly for fun and only once per year)

                          the point is those simulations are very credible, it makes them money because it works, that was the point. but again, that's not what i'm talking about anyways. i'm talking about simulations at certain points of those 4 games where the chargers chances of winning was at it's highest.

                          it's not like the chargers had a 30 million to 1 chance to simply win 1 out of 4 games. that's what you seem to think this is and that's just flat out dumb and not what was being stated in the article.



                          jay cutler had all the physical tools, that's why people were hyped. i never said cutler was a bad player or wouldn't make it in the NFL, i just said he was a career loser and a head case, spot on accuracy.

                          tebow was the opposite, if tebow had cutlers skill and mechanics coming out of college, he would have been peyton manning 2.0



                          you act like i wasn't here when most of you were gushing over tebow and arguing with me about my points that he didn't have what it takes to be a starting NFL QB. that includes beagle and arapaho who support anything that wears a broncos uni devoid of any real thought or reason.

                          there were a few i remember that didn't drink the kool aid, most of which follow college and saw what i did, i remember corywinget was one of them for example. yes i can remember specific people because that's how few of you there were, at least in smack.

                          point is, when people make up an number like im' wrong 99% of the time, that's clearly them lying to themselves and not even trying to hide the fact they are exaggerating.

                          that's cool though, when i end up right about the chargers this season i will just claim you are all wrong 99% of the time and call it good
                          OK I'm not even about to read this butt hurt saga of a rant! I just don't have time.

                          However I will say that we do not base anything on odds. You of all people should know that baph.

                          We base everything on stats and victories, not on odds so please understand that your argument is mute.

                          Smh, Computer simulations and odds SMH I think it's time to award a new poster with the excuse gate. Should we break out the excuse gate?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                            yes because having the worst pass blocking in the NFL and mainly scrubs to throw the ball to has no bearing on a play where rivers is 100% going to throw the football.

                            rivers over his career has been good in the 4th, just not recently due to obvious reasons you are all obvious to.
                            Recently? Your brothers at the CMB seem to have a running tally that says otherwise.......Keep in mind this hasnt been updated with last year's brain farts yet.

                            Since 2010 when down by 1 score in the 4th quarter:

                            Rivers is 222-372 2,291 yards 9TD 15INT for a QB rating of 68.7. He's been sacked 31 times. He has fumbled 12 times, losing 5 of those.

                            Rivers had led 84 drives down by 8 or less since 2010. Of those 84 drives, he has led the team down to take the lead 13 times and tie 9 other times (26.2%).

                            On those 84 drives the team has scored a total of 118 points (1.4 pts per drive).

                            The team has won 10 and lost 35.

                            They have 22 total turnovers (26.2%).
                            15 Rivers INT's. 5 lost fumbles by Rivers.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Sam_Z View Post
                              OK I'm not even about to read this butt hurt saga of a rant! I just don't have time.

                              However I will say that we do not base anything on odds. You of all people should know that baph.

                              We base everything on stats and victories, not on odds so please understand that your argument is mute.

                              Smh, Computer simulations and odds SMH I think it's time to award a new poster with the excuse gate. Should we break out the excuse gate?
                              that's your problem, you are not reading and comprehending what i'm saying and you seem to be clueless why i posted that article.

                              maybe shake the rocks in your head a little less perhaps?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by baphamet View Post
                                lol is that why i made a thread saying there will be none?
                                You can say it, I'll believe it when I see it. The excuses will be out in full force though once the chargers lose.
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X