Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Game one.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Freyaka
    replied
    Originally posted by arapaho View Post
    says this guy Dave Dameshek


    He received his first big break in 2001 when he was hired as a writer on Comedy Central's The Man Show, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel and Adam Carolla. and then

    The Adam Carolla Show debuted in January 2006, recorded in Los Angeles and airing in syndication on stations across the western United States. Dameshek was a regular cast member on the show from the beginning, serving as the show's official sports reporter. In December 2006, he and several other staff members were cut from the show, a move attributed to a ratings drop in the second half of the year...As of February 2017, Dameshek still holds the distinction of being the only man ever replaced by Danny Bonaduce. :thumb:


    well its official if a guy who was a shows official sports reporter, and then was replaced by Danny Bonaduce says it

    I guess we should all just write off week one already
    Maybe his football baby can lend his insight to this discussion?

    Leave a comment:


  • arapaho
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    http://www.chargers.com/video/2017/0...s-draft-winner

    like i said before, i'm not the only one saying these things, i was just the first to do so. keep the hope alive donko fans, your team is going to run into a buzz saw week 1.

    sucks to be you on september 11th

    says this guy Dave Dameshek


    He received his first big break in 2001 when he was hired as a writer on Comedy Central's The Man Show, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel and Adam Carolla. and then

    The Adam Carolla Show debuted in January 2006, recorded in Los Angeles and airing in syndication on stations across the western United States. Dameshek was a regular cast member on the show from the beginning, serving as the show's official sports reporter. In December 2006, he and several other staff members were cut from the show, a move attributed to a ratings drop in the second half of the year...As of February 2017, Dameshek still holds the distinction of being the only man ever replaced by Danny Bonaduce. :thumb:


    well its official if a guy who was a shows official sports reporter, and then was replaced by Danny Bonaduce says it

    I guess we should all just write off week one already

    Leave a comment:


  • mozzerpete
    replied
    Excuse: The Chargers need time to adjust playing in Los Angeles' elevation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_Z
    replied
    Originally posted by arapaho View Post
    worst pass blocking
    worst coaches
    worst defense
    worst special teams in history
    worst play calling
    worst scheme for rivers
    worst injuries
    worst pass blocking


    wow rivers is a powder puff isn't he...it seems he cant compete unless every thing is perfect...the scheme is brilliantly designed completely fooling the defense all day, the pass protection doesn't let a finger touch ol phillis, nobody ever gets injured, the play calling completely fools the defense, the special teams scores or gives him the ball in the redzone every time...then

    old Philip rivers will shine
    or you will just add another line to your excuse list

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam_Z View Post
    Baph nobody's reading your article because all you're doing is talking out of your ass.

    I've read your stupid article and I comprehend it fine but it doesn't matter because it is a stupid lousy excuse and nobody can understand why you don't understand that.
    what excuse am i making? all im saying is that aint ever happening again. you are acting like i'm making some kind of excuse for losing but in reality i'm listing all these things that just don't happen twice.

    I've noticed that you keep using this emoji and I don't know why because nobody thinks you're funny you're not funny if you situation isn't funny it's ridiculous.
    all that matters is i'm laughing and getting under your skin, which is easy to do lol

    when you're team gets on the field and actually starts winning games then we will listen to you. Perhaps at that time if ever you may have a valid argument for whatever case you're trying to argue but until then anything you have to say is crap when considering the dumb excuses you've come up with to support that dogmatic argument.
    LMAO!! is that right? so how come nobody was listening to me when the chargers controlled the division? the fact that the national media is starting to say things ive been saying since last year tells you there is validity to what i say.

    Yes the Chargers choked away a season and yes your stupid article says doing that is a gazillion to one shot but yet they managed to do it in back to back seasons.
    this right here is a perfect example of what m talking about. you are clueless, plain and simple. that article isn't just talking about choking in general or suggesting the chargers won't choke any games away this year. i also never said or implied they wouldnt choke any games away.

    no they did not do that two years in a row, they choked away 4 games last season....two of which they had a 99.9% chance of winning at one point yet lost and the other two a 75% chance of winning at one point but still lost.

    that's not ever happening again and to be honest it's not the main point i am making anyways.......meanwhile i challenge any of you to find me another team that has sent more guys to IR in the last two years, go back as far as you want.....meanwhile they had arguably the worst OL in football which they likely just improved a lot.


    So keep coming out is with your computer simulation, the point is is there still losers and you know it and you can't find a way to justify it other than a stupid computer simulation.
    i don't have to do anything but wait until september 11th. while we wait, go read all the articles coming out that are all basically repeating what i have been saying since last year

    i know what i'm talking about and you all hate it, you are going to hate it a lot more when reality sets in september 11th.

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    i'm just going to leave this here.

    http://www.chargers.com/video/2017/0...s-draft-winner

    like i said before, i'm not the only one saying these things, i was just the first to do so. keep the hope alive donko fans, your team is going to run into a buzz saw week 1.

    sucks to be you on september 11th

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_Z
    replied
    Originally posted by arapaho View Post
    worst pass blocking
    worst coaches
    worst defense
    worst special teams in history
    worst play calling
    worst scheme for rivers
    worst injuries
    worst pass blocking


    wow rivers is a powder puff isn't he...it seems he cant compete unless every thing is perfect...the scheme is brilliantly designed completely fooling the defense all day, the pass protection doesn't let a finger touch ol phillis, nobody ever gets injured, the play calling completely fools the defense, the special teams scores or gives him the ball in the redzone every time...then

    old Philip rivers will shine
    or you will just add another line to your excuse list
    Perhaps Philis having the worst fan base in the NFL had something to do with it! "Nobody liketh me nobody liketh me"

    Leave a comment:


  • arapaho
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    yes because having the worst pass blocking in the NFL and mainly scrubs to throw the ball to has no bearing on a play where rivers is 100% going to throw the football.

    rivers over his career has been good in the 4th, just not recently due to obvious reasons you are all obvious to.
    worst pass blocking
    worst coaches
    worst defense
    worst special teams in history
    worst play calling
    worst scheme for rivers
    worst injuries
    worst pass blocking


    wow rivers is a powder puff isn't he...it seems he cant compete unless every thing is perfect...the scheme is brilliantly designed completely fooling the defense all day, the pass protection doesn't let a finger touch ol phillis, nobody ever gets injured, the play calling completely fools the defense, the special teams scores or gives him the ball in the redzone every time...then

    old Philip rivers will shine
    or you will just add another line to your excuse list

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_Z
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet
    do what two seasons in a row? have the worst OL and have the most guys on IR over that span? that is impressive, isnt it? rivers with time and the weapons he has will lite it up.
    What is impressive about it?

    Rivers is an NFL quarterback, it's expected of him to carry his team if he has to but yet he can't even seem to complete that.

    Peyton Manning had a fractured vertebrae yet he came out and had the best season of his career at age 37.

    Stop looking for a pat on the back for rivers because you ain't going to get it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Beagle
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    do what two seasons in a row? have the worst OL and have the most guys on IR over that span? that is impressive, isnt it? rivers with time and the weapons he has will lite it up.
    He has "lite" it up he is elite qb lite

    lite
    līt/Submit
    adjective
    1.
    relating to low-fat or low-sugar versions of manufactured food or drink products.
    "lite beer"
    noun
    1.
    beer with relatively few calories.
    What he has done 2 years in a row and actually more than that is lose games that should be impossible to lose.He seems quite good at it.
    Originally posted by atwaterandstir View Post
    Recently? Your brothers at the CMB seem to have a running tally that says otherwise.......Keep in mind this hasnt been updated with last year's brain farts yet.

    Since 2010 when down by 1 score in the 4th quarter:

    Rivers is 222-372 2,291 yards 9TD 15INT for a QB rating of 68.7. He's been sacked 31 times. He has fumbled 12 times, losing 5 of those.

    Rivers had led 84 drives down by 8 or less since 2010. Of those 84 drives, he has led the team down to take the lead 13 times and tie 9 other times (26.2%).

    On those 84 drives the team has scored a total of 118 points (1.4 pts per drive).

    The team has won 10 and lost 35.

    They have 22 total turnovers (26.2%).
    15 Rivers INT's. 5 lost fumbles by Rivers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_Z
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    that's your problem, you are not reading and comprehending what i'm saying and you seem to be clueless why i posted that article.

    maybe shake the rocks in your head a little less perhaps?
    Baph nobody's reading your article because all you're doing is talking out of your ass.

    I've read your stupid article and I comprehend it fine but it doesn't matter because it is a stupid lousy excuse and nobody can understand why you don't understand that.

    I've noticed that you keep using this emoji and I don't know why because nobody thinks you're funny you're not funny if you situation isn't funny it's ridiculous.

    when you're team gets on the field and actually starts winning games then we will listen to you. Perhaps at that time if ever you may have a valid argument for whatever case you're trying to argue but until then anything you have to say is crap when considering the dumb excuses you've come up with to support that dogmatic argument.

    Yes the Chargers choked away a season and yes your stupid article says doing that is a gazillion to one shot but yet they managed to do it in back to back seasons.

    So keep coming out is with your computer simulation, the point is is there still losers and you know it and you can't find a way to justify it other than a stupid computer simulation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Freyaka
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    lol is that why i made a thread saying there will be none?
    You can say it, I'll believe it when I see it. The excuses will be out in full force though once the chargers lose.

    Leave a comment:


  • baphamet
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam_Z View Post
    OK I'm not even about to read this butt hurt saga of a rant! I just don't have time.

    However I will say that we do not base anything on odds. You of all people should know that baph.

    We base everything on stats and victories, not on odds so please understand that your argument is mute.

    Smh, Computer simulations and odds SMH I think it's time to award a new poster with the excuse gate. Should we break out the excuse gate?
    that's your problem, you are not reading and comprehending what i'm saying and you seem to be clueless why i posted that article.

    maybe shake the rocks in your head a little less perhaps?

    Leave a comment:


  • atwaterandstir
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    yes because having the worst pass blocking in the NFL and mainly scrubs to throw the ball to has no bearing on a play where rivers is 100% going to throw the football.

    rivers over his career has been good in the 4th, just not recently due to obvious reasons you are all obvious to.
    Recently? Your brothers at the CMB seem to have a running tally that says otherwise.......Keep in mind this hasnt been updated with last year's brain farts yet.

    Since 2010 when down by 1 score in the 4th quarter:

    Rivers is 222-372 2,291 yards 9TD 15INT for a QB rating of 68.7. He's been sacked 31 times. He has fumbled 12 times, losing 5 of those.

    Rivers had led 84 drives down by 8 or less since 2010. Of those 84 drives, he has led the team down to take the lead 13 times and tie 9 other times (26.2%).

    On those 84 drives the team has scored a total of 118 points (1.4 pts per drive).

    The team has won 10 and lost 35.

    They have 22 total turnovers (26.2%).
    15 Rivers INT's. 5 lost fumbles by Rivers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_Z
    replied
    Originally posted by baphamet View Post
    please elaborate, why is it stupid? because it says things you don't like? are you not capable of realizing how many things had to happen at the end of those games in order for those chokes to become chokes?

    yes it does matter because it wasn't entire game simulations, it was a simulation showing the odds of them losing at certain points in the 4th quarter, you can bet on these things in vegas.

    did you notice the part about the chargers losing two games where their odds of winning at one point in both games was 99.9%? i really don't think you are capable of comprehending what this all means.



    no, i just don't discredit things i don't understand like you are clearly doing. you are acting like this was just a simulation of full games played, like simulating a full season and setting the odds of win totals, which is exactly what vegas does.

    nope, that's not what that is. say the chargers are up 3 scores with 5 minutes to go in the 4th, they do a simulation millions of times to see how many times the chargers would finish out and win that game. that's what they did but they did it at points where the odds of the chargers winning those games were at their highest.

    you are clueless, plain and simple.



    your ignorance doesn't surprise me unfortunately lol



    you are talking to someone that works in the gambling industry, i don't gamble money for a reason (unless it's fantasy football and that's mainly for fun and only once per year)

    the point is those simulations are very credible, it makes them money because it works, that was the point. but again, that's not what i'm talking about anyways. i'm talking about simulations at certain points of those 4 games where the chargers chances of winning was at it's highest.

    it's not like the chargers had a 30 million to 1 chance to simply win 1 out of 4 games. that's what you seem to think this is and that's just flat out dumb and not what was being stated in the article.



    jay cutler had all the physical tools, that's why people were hyped. i never said cutler was a bad player or wouldn't make it in the NFL, i just said he was a career loser and a head case, spot on accuracy.

    tebow was the opposite, if tebow had cutlers skill and mechanics coming out of college, he would have been peyton manning 2.0



    you act like i wasn't here when most of you were gushing over tebow and arguing with me about my points that he didn't have what it takes to be a starting NFL QB. that includes beagle and arapaho who support anything that wears a broncos uni devoid of any real thought or reason.

    there were a few i remember that didn't drink the kool aid, most of which follow college and saw what i did, i remember corywinget was one of them for example. yes i can remember specific people because that's how few of you there were, at least in smack.

    point is, when people make up an number like im' wrong 99% of the time, that's clearly them lying to themselves and not even trying to hide the fact they are exaggerating.

    that's cool though, when i end up right about the chargers this season i will just claim you are all wrong 99% of the time and call it good
    OK I'm not even about to read this butt hurt saga of a rant! I just don't have time.

    However I will say that we do not base anything on odds. You of all people should know that baph.

    We base everything on stats and victories, not on odds so please understand that your argument is mute.

    Smh, Computer simulations and odds SMH I think it's time to award a new poster with the excuse gate. Should we break out the excuse gate?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X