Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Just a suggestion...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Just a suggestion...

    I have been wanting to give a CP to a certain user. However, as I do not give CP very often I am unable to give him CP because I gave that user a CP several days ago. I think a good idea to add to the CP Point is the re-use time for an individual. Say, the CP system forgets the person you last gave a CP after say a 24-48 hours after the said CP.
    The Browns are gone; I'm not a fan of the Impostors

    The real Browns are in Baltimore, see?

  • #2
    Originally posted by Dawgfan
    I have been wanting to give a CP to a certain user. However, as I do not give CP very often I am unable to give him CP because I gave that user a CP several days ago. I think a good idea to add to the CP Point is the re-use time for an individual. Say, the CP system forgets the person you last gave a CP after say a 24-48 hours after the said CP.
    I think 24-48 hours may be a little short....but 96 hours sounds like a good amount of time.

    I think that's a good idea....if even technically possible....
    Administrator

    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      Nope. The system is designed the way it is to prevent people from only pointing certian other people. You MUST spread them around for that reason.

      Otherwise, you could just continue to point the same person over and over again after the appointed time went by, defeating the whole reason for the system in the first place.

      Having the system like that would me I could give my points to Jaws (an example), and nobody else. Skewing her points unfairly over everyone else.

      The system as it is is fair to everyone, and prevents people from forming CP clicks.

      And if there's anything from what I have seen here, if we allowed it, CP clicks would form overnight here.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by JWinn
        Nope. The system is designed the way it is to prevent people from only pointing certian other people. You MUST spread them around for that reason.
        Very well, I did go out and throw out CP to whomever. In fact I gave you one a while ago I didn't say it was from me though. But, you are a moderator so I am sure you know it was me.
        The Browns are gone; I'm not a fan of the Impostors

        The real Browns are in Baltimore, see?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Dawgfan
          Very well, I did go out and throw out CP to whomever. In fact I gave you one a while ago I didn't say it was from me though. But, you are a moderator so I am sure you know it was me.
          I do! lol

          There's no rules as to who, or why you point anyone else. Your free to toss them at people like trash if you want, just so you can get back to pointing someone in particular.

          That's not really encouraged, but again, there is no rule regarding who you point, or where, or why.

          It's just you cant give them all to one person. Thats why the ten person rule is in place. If your going to bring up one person's status, you gotta bring up ten others. Or nine others, whatever.

          Thanks!

          In the end, the person who created and installed this sytem left us last year. Dont quote me, because I am not positive, but I think that without him, the tech crew would have to junk the whole thing and start over in order to make any changes to the CP system.

          And that would be pretty drastic for any change.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by JWinn
            Having the system like that would me I could give my points to Jaws (an example), and nobody else. Skewing her points unfairly over everyone else.
            Awwwww come on JWinn, if anyone deserves to have the system skewed in her favor it's Sharkie!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Calif. Bronco
              Awwwww come on JWinn, if anyone deserves to have the system skewed in her favor it's Sharkie!
              That gets my vote. maybe they can set it up so we all can just give our favorite shark an cp a day.
              [URL=http://s93.photobucket.com/user/Saddletramp69/media/asdf.jpg.html][/URL
              Adopted player Lindsey

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TEXSOONER/BRONC
                That gets my vote. maybe they can set it up so we all can just give our favorite shark an cp a day.
                For me my favorite Shark would get 2 CPs if I could help it.
                NHL Blog at:NHL Blog by Medford Bronco!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JWinn
                  Nope. The system is designed the way it is to prevent people from only pointing certian other people. You MUST spread them around for that reason.

                  Otherwise, you could just continue to point the same person over and over again after the appointed time went by, defeating the whole reason for the system in the first place.

                  Having the system like that would me I could give my points to Jaws (an example), and nobody else. Skewing her points unfairly over everyone else.

                  The system as it is is fair to everyone, and prevents people from forming CP clicks.

                  And if there's anything from what I have seen here, if we allowed it, CP clicks would form overnight here.
                  When can we bring in this change?

                  I'm all for it!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    is it possible to hi-jack a thread in feedback?? If so I do believe that 4 posts sorta off topic counts as a hi-jacking.
                    [URL=http://s93.photobucket.com/user/Saddletramp69/media/asdf.jpg.html][/URL
                    Adopted player Lindsey

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by TEXSOONER/BRONC
                      is it possible to hi-jack a thread in feedback??
                      Sounds like that could be a violation of the CoC, doesn't it?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X