Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mountain West wants BCS Bid

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mountain West wants BCS Bid

    Mountain West pushing for BCS change

    January 26, 2009 3:50 PM

    Posted by ESPN.com's Graham Watson

    The Mountain West is angling for an automatic BCS bid.

    It's something that has been talked about since Utah defeated Alabama in the Sugar Bowl, but now people who could elicit change are discussing the possibility.

    According to USA Today, Mountain West Conference commissioner Craig Thompson and the presidents and chancellors of the nine members of the Mountain West Conference had a meeting in early January to discuss the prospect of pushing for immediate automatic qualification as a BCS conference. Thompson is expected to sit down with Atlantic Coast commissioner and current BCS coordinator John Swofford in the coming weeks to discuss the possibility.

    It's probably not reasonable to think that the Mountain West will gain automatic qualifying status for the 2009 season. Even the article states that all of the conferences, including the Mountain West, agreed to the current BCS system.

    However, this is definitely a step toward pushing for automatic qualification in 2012, after the four-year evaluation period ends.

    As I wrote in an earlier post, the BCS is in the midst of a four-year evaluation to determine whether another conference is worthy of an automatic BCS bid or whether there are conferences that don't deserve to have them. Currently, six conferences have automatic BCS bids and BCS rules stipulate that no more than seven conferences will have automatic entrance.

    The Mountain West has taken a huge lead in this race, and if history is any indication, it won't be relinquishing that lead any time soon. The Mountain West has had at least one team with double digit wins in every season except 1999, the first year of the conference. And since 2006, the conference has boasted at least three teams with nine or more wins.

    This year, the Mountain West had three teams finish in the AP Top 25, which is as many as the Pac-10 and the ACC, and more than the Big East.

    The one concern with the Mountain West, at least at this stage, would be parity within the conference. For the past few years, the conference has been dominated by Utah, BYU and TCU. While Air Force, Colorado State and New Mexico have shown flashes of being competitive, those teams, along with Wyoming, UNLV, and San Diego State, will have to pick up the slack to keep the Mountain West competitive.

    In all fairness, the Mountain West was one of six conferences to not have more than one team with fewer than four wins this season (San Diego State).

    To show the Mountain West isn't taking its bid for automatic qualification lightly, it has put together some of the fiercest nonconference schedules -- as a conference -- in the entire non-BCS and perhaps the country. Every team in the Mountain West has at least one BCS opponent on their schedule, six of those teams were raked in the AP's final Top 25, and four of the nine teams have two BCS opponents, mostly from the Big 12. Each team also has scheduled a high-level team from a non-BCS conference.

    There is no doubt the conference as a whole is making a push for this bid and the rest of the nation is sitting up and taking notice. From the various articles written about Utah having a chance at the national title to calls for legislation to change the BCS being brought to Washington. The Mountain West is spearheading a movement that could bring about radical change in college football.

    http://myespn.go.com/blogs/others/0-...CS-change.html

    I for one am for it. Did you see Utah, BYU, and TCU this year they could probably beat any team in the country on a good day. Plus Air Force, New Mexico and CSU always have their years. Plus Fairchild is doing a good job at CSU so expect them to turn heads in the upcoming years.

    Plus this confrence actually puts hard opponets on their schedule. They put big BCS schools ar etheir schedule and do quiet well. I believe their overall record beat the PAC-10. The mountain west was better than the PAC-10 this past year.

    SO I APPROVE THIS Petition :salute!:
    sigpic

  • #2
    The MWC should have an automatic bid. If the BigEast, Pac-10 and ACC have one then the MWC should as well. Obviously USC gives Pac-10 a big jump in power, but if they didn't have the auto-bid they would go to the BCS anyway. BigEast hasn't been that great the past few years, and the ACC has fallen off quite a bit over the past few years. If the MWC had an auto-bid, Utah would have had a shot to play in the national championship game in the 04-05 season, and again in this season. I remember a lot of analysts on ESPN called the MWC the 3rd best conference in college football throughout the season, behind the SEC and Big-12.
    sigpic
    Thanks Blondie79!
    All aboard the TEBOW TRAIN... since 2006!
    Team Tebow #15

    Adopted NFL Player:
    "Oh Mercy"PERCY HARVIN

    Comment


    • #3
      I think it should happy. But of course I am a bit biased.
      ...capture it...remember it...

      Comment


      • #4
        Do it. I think all of the conferences should get bids in a playoff, but, if another one gets a bid in the BCS, it can only help.
        sigpic

        I think Ben Tate will be the best back taken in the 2010 draft. (5/3/10)
        SportsXPicks, check out the Rants and Opinions section

        Comment


        • #5
          The MWC is becoming a really strong conference, and with CSU getting stronger, watch out for 4 top 25 teams this next year. I agree with the MWC becoming a BCS conference.
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BVP View Post
            The MWC is becoming a really strong conference, and with CSU getting stronger, watch out for 4 top 25 teams this next year. I agree with the MWC becoming a BCS conference.
            well they were better than the ACC Big East and Pac 10 last year. too bad it wont happen till 2012 tho if it do happen. that the year i graduate from csu
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Atwnbroncfan View Post
              well they were better than the ACC Big East and Pac 10 last year. too bad it wont happen till 2012 tho if it do happen. that the year i graduate from csu
              thats a bummer i'll be at CSU the year they become BCS!
              sigpic

              Comment


              • #8
                This Big XII Fan approves this petition.

                So no more than 7 conferences can get an auto-bid. So far, we have 6: Big 12, SEC, Big Ten, Big East, ACC, and Pac-10. If we're giving one of the Mid-Major conferences an auto-bid, it's between:

                MWC
                WAC
                C-USA
                MAC
                Sun Belt

                It should *totally* go to Sun Belt.

                But seriously, I'd say the MWC is definitely the front-runner. Sure, the WAC produced 2 BCS Busters for the last 2 years before Utah did it, but in one of those years (if I remember correctly), it would have been TCU if it hadn't lost to SMU, which turned out to be its lone loss of the year. I think the MWC definitely has the edge, and they should get it. If there's any sort of competition, it's the WAC...but I don't think the WAC should get the bid.

                Em-Dub-See for BCS.
                I adopted Peanut!!!
                Adopted by *Atwater*!!!

                I'm UNDEFEATED at Broncos games!!!!

                12/06/09 @ Kansas City: W 44-13


                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  i disapprove. the mwc is way too top heavy of a conference. a bcs conference should be well balanced. outside of tcu, utah, and byu which teams are worth anything? the bcs conferences usually have about 3 great teams with the rest being good to average except 1 or 2 really crappy teams. the mwc in most years has a few good teams with the rest being all really crappy teams. rarely they will have years like this where they have ONE great team a couple good teams and the rest being really crappy. that's not good enough to cut it as a bcs conference
                  Last edited by DrunkPanda; 01-30-2009, 12:42 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DrunkPanda View Post
                    i disapprove. the mwc is way too top heavy of a conference. a bcs conference should be well balanced. outside of tcu, utah, and byu which teams are worth anything? the bcs conferences usually have about 3 great teams with the rest being good to average except 1 or 2 really crappy teams. the mwc in most years has a few good teams with the rest being all really crappy teams. rarely they will have years like this where they have ONE great team a couple good teams and the rest being really crappy. that's not good enough to cut it as a bcs conference
                    Are you honestly telling us that the mountain west doesn't deserve to be BCS but the Big east does? Seriously the mountain west is overall a better conference then the big east.
                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Alright BVP here is his deal: if the MWC gets an auto bid it gives CSU a better chance at getting a BCS game than his beloved CU buffs... because he knows they will never compete with OU or UT... and if CSU gets a BCS game how can he talk crap? Guess he will have to talk about their glorious past! Haha!
                      sigpic
                      Thanks Blondie79!
                      All aboard the TEBOW TRAIN... since 2006!
                      Team Tebow #15

                      Adopted NFL Player:
                      "Oh Mercy"PERCY HARVIN

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DrunkPanda View Post
                        i disapprove. the mwc is way too top heavy of a conference. a bcs conference should be well balanced. outside of tcu, utah, and byu which teams are worth anything? the bcs conferences usually have about 3 great teams with the rest being good to average except 1 or 2 really crappy teams. the mwc in most years has a few good teams with the rest being all really crappy teams. rarely they will have years like this where they have ONE great team a couple good teams and the rest being really crappy. that's not good enough to cut it as a bcs conference
                        Just about as well distributed as the Pac-10, ACC, Big East.
                        sigpic

                        I think Ben Tate will be the best back taken in the 2010 draft. (5/3/10)
                        SportsXPicks, check out the Rants and Opinions section

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by GatorChomp View Post
                          Alright BVP here is his deal: if the MWC gets an auto bid it gives CSU a better chance at getting a BCS game than his beloved CU buffs... because he knows they will never compete with OU or UT... and if CSU gets a BCS game how can he talk crap? Guess he will have to talk about their glorious past! Haha!
                          Just wait til we get Tim Tebow and that Arena Football League/Run And Shoot Hybrid offense in Boulder, CU will conquer the world. It's easy to run your mouth when you're team is National Champs, and speaking of CU's "glorious past", I was a mouthy Pre-teen punk when CU won theirs, so I know where you're coming from.

                          The MWC's whining is pointless, the only way to settle it is to have a playoff.......and that ain't EVER going to happen. The BCS is about MONEY, and the MWC teams don't bring enough people to the boobtube. It has nothing to do with Utah being better than Colorado.......it has everything to do with the draw that the conference brings as a whole.

                          Nobody gives a sheet about the Mountain West, those teams have been whining about no respect since the days of the WAC because the vast majority of the College Football Universe couldn't care less about that conference, they are most useful when people are making an argument for a playoff.

                          And people can say what they want about the Big East, apparently the BCS disagrees at this point.

                          Maybe someday.......

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by GatorChomp View Post
                            Alright BVP here is his deal: if the MWC gets an auto bid it gives CSU a better chance at getting a BCS game than his beloved CU buffs... because he knows they will never compete with OU or UT... and if CSU gets a BCS game how can he talk crap? Guess he will have to talk about their glorious past! Haha!
                            can't compete with OU or UT? we BEAT OU the last time we played them and dominated the stats sheet while doing so. we competed well with texas last year and would have been a very close game if our kicker could make anything from beyond 20 yards out. in the alltime series, texas has beaten us like once more than we have beaten them...

                            CSU would have a better chance at getting a bcs game? even if mwc gets a bcs bowl bid csu would most likely have to finish first in the conference to get a bcs bowl, you think that's likely to happen? besides, even without an automatic bcs bowl bid, if csu won the conference they would probably go to a bcs bowl, the mwc becoming a bcs conference doesn't help them with that. colorado's only been down for a few years (which happens to every team eventually) but we've been very good in the somewhat recent past

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X