Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The New Wac (post 2011)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    i'm expecting/hoping that a team from the big east ends up in a bcs bowl with a 7-5 or 6-6 record

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by DrunkPanda
      i'm expecting/hoping that a team from the big east ends up in a bcs bowl with a 7-5 or 6-6 record
      yeah right....


      big east is a joke of a conference right now.



      but when its all said and done, we need a freakin playoff system BAD!!!!!!

      even a plus 1 would be better than this filth. Just add 1 more game after the bowl games to determine the real #1 after TCU beats boise..

      *runs away*

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by 12and4
        edit: just found out UD won't play football for the WAC... they don't have a football team i guess (or maybe not at D1 level)
        No, but they do have a damn good hockey team with a lot of Championships! LOL

        Go Pioneers!

        Adopted Posters - Broncoholic MS, thatkidhunt, Al Wilson 4 Mayor, Thors Hammer, McSmashie, CanDB, Peanut, BroncoManiac_69, MightyHorse, CHARGER$, Chillez, EddieMac
        Married Megan Joy on August 18th, 2013
        Proud Daddy of Jeremiah James born February 24, 2011

        Adopt-A-Bronco 2013 - Champ Bailey
        Yankees, Rockies, Nuggets, Avalanche, CU Buffs
        I still miss you Jake Plummer!



        sigpic

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by 12and4
          Now that Boise State is playing their last season in the WAC, and Fresno State and Nevada are in their last 2 seasons... the WAC has already chosen our replacements...


          Joining Hawaii, La tech, san jose state, utah state, new mexico state, and idaho* in 2012 are:

          University of Denver
          Texas-San Antonio
          Texas State


          I don't see how Texas teams are "western" but whatever, lol...

          Good Luck to UD!


          edit: just found out UD won't play football for the WAC... they don't have a football team i guess (or maybe not at D1 level)

          *Idaho sucks
          THANK GOD my Montana Grizzlies decided not to accept the WACs offer. Moving up would have been a stupid move for them.

          [can breathe now]
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #20
            The WAC can say good-bye to Hawaii too.
            sigpic
            Thank you to my grandfather jetrazor for being a veteran of the armed forces!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Skywalker
              THANK GOD my Montana Grizzlies decided not to accept the WACs offer. Moving up would have been a stupid move for them.

              [can breathe now]
              why?

              you realize the best program in the wac is san jose state or idaho?
              Last edited by Sparky The Sun Devil; 11-20-2010, 10:13 AM.

              Comment


              • #22
                Hey Sparky, you must be thrilled Dennis Erickson is returning to the Sun Devils next year!!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Sparky The Sun Devil
                  why?

                  you realize the best program in the wac is san jose state or idaho?
                  And your point is?

                  If the Griz moved up they would have

                  1) Lost one of the longest rivalry games in college football (today was the 110th meeting between Montana and Montana State). Do you have any idea how BIG that game is every year and how much that game means to everyone in Montana? Nope, you don't.

                  2) What's better, playing some crappy bowl game in some random state, or hosting 2-3 playoffs games and making money off those home games? The Griz have won the Big Sky title 12 years in a row (the streak ended this year though), and they're pretty much guaranteed to host a home playoff game every year.

                  3) I bet the Griz could beat Idaho and such, but everyone is used to winning. They would have had a long transition to the next level. Not everyone is going to be Boise State when they move up either. There's more of a chance they'd end up like Marshall.

                  Yeah, no thanks. Don't act like you know what's better. I'd rather have a chance to compete for a National Title every year, attend a home playoff game in person, and be able to enjoy watching a playoff system in college football.
                  Last edited by Skywalker; 11-20-2010, 08:06 PM.
                  sigpic

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Sparky The Sun Devil
                    why?

                    you realize the best program in the wac is san jose state or idaho?
                    Best program i'd say is LA Tech... the others just have a better history... but I think when we all leave, it's LA Techs conference.


                    (granted hawaii leaves)


                    edit: and sky, idk about you but i'd rather my team be playing with the big boys rather than wish for mediocrity.. That would be like asking the denver broncos to switch to UFL...

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Skywalker
                      And your point is?

                      If the Griz moved up they would have

                      1) Lost one of the longest rivalry games in college football (today was the 110th meeting between Montana and Montana State). Do you have any idea how BIG that game is every year and how much that game means to everyone in Montana? Nope, you don't.

                      2) What's better, playing some crappy bowl game in some random state, or hosting 2-3 playoffs games and making money off those home games? The Griz have won the Big Sky title 12 years in a row (the streak ended this year though), and they're pretty much guaranteed to host a home playoff game every year.

                      3) I bet the Griz could beat Idaho and such, but everyone is used to winning. They would have had a long transition to the next level. Not everyone is going to be Boise State when they move up either. There's more of a chance they'd end up like Marshall.


                      1. You can still easily have the rivalry game

                      2. The "playoffs" are a total sham when your not including 120 better programs. You would make more money in fbs even with less home games.

                      3. Average FBS non-AQ > Dominate FCS program. And you mean a 100% Fake National Title you compete for


                      If you played high school, would you have rather stayed on the JV team for four years?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by 12and4
                        Best program i'd say is LA Tech... the others just have a better history... but I think when we all leave, it's LA Techs conference.


                        (granted hawaii leaves)


                        edit: and sky, idk about you but i'd rather my team be playing with the big boys rather than wish for mediocrity.. That would be like asking the denver broncos to switch to UFL...
                        "Wish for mediocrity"? Lol, I'd rather watch them win all the time than have a losing record every year playing with the "big boys". Moving up would be wishing for mediocrity.

                        And Sparky, the rivalry game wouldn't be the same. Every year it's the last game of the season and it's usually for the Big Sky conference or the winner gets to play in the playoffs.

                        Fake National Title? It's the National Title for the FCS, the FBS has nothing to do with it. It's very much a National Title.

                        I don't even know why you guys are arguing with me, I prefer watching FCS football much like some people prefer watching college football over pro football. There's just a different feel to it. If you want to call it mediocrity, fine. [shrugs]
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          while i agree on most points that it's probably better to play in the FBS than the FCS, and that their NC game really doesn't amount to much and no one pays attention to who the FCS National Champion is, their process for getting to said game is less fake and 100% more fair than the process of getting to the REAL Fake National Championship game in FBS because of the BCS. yeah it's the BCS National Title but can it really, truly be called the College Football National Title?

                          no because only a select group of teams even have a chance at said title. there are 120 teams in FBS and only 65 (69 if you count the Independents) have a a true shot at the title. not sure if my math is correct on that but basically only around HALF of the teams in FBS college football are really "eligible" and the rest are really playing for nothing.

                          i mean BSU will probably end up back at #3 after tomorrow or for sure after next week and if either Oregon or Auburn (or God-forbid both) lose by the end of the season... even then BSU's chances for getting up to #2 are slim...

                          now how is THAT fair?

                          so really, is there even a real, true national title in any division of college football? one of them is sham, almost rigged, money grubbing machine, and the other 3 don't even matter because MOST people only care about FBS football.
                          sigpic

                          DISCLAIMER: MY REVIEWS OFTEN CONTAIN SPOILERS. READ AT YOUR OWN RISK.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X
                          😀
                          🥰
                          🤢
                          😎
                          😡
                          👍
                          👎