Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nebraska Spring Practice

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by rcsodak
    LMAO!

    Patience, my son......




    ...p...a...t...i...e....n...c....e.......


    fine. be that way.

    Leave a comment:


  • rcsodak
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick7
    But I want to change it NOW!!!
    LMAO!

    Patience, my son......




    ...p...a...t...i...e....n...c....e.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by rcsodak
    When NU gets in and STAYS in the top 10 in recruiting, as long as the usc's, ou's, etc., then you can change the wording also.......

    But I want to change it NOW!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • rcsodak
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick7
    Like I said in a different thread, I have seen different things from different sources.

    I have no problem admitting we're in rebuilding mode, but to say OU isn't and they go 8-4 isn't something to be proud of.
    Reloading, Nick........

    When NU gets in and STAYS in the top 10 in recruiting, as long as the usc's, ou's, etc., then you can change the wording also.......

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by rcsodak
    OU - Strength of Schedule - #1

    Huskers - #36


    ....."practically the same"?

    Did you forget that TCU was a darling of the NCAA last year?
    I doubt they'd beat out OU in a best of 3, but they were pretty good last year.

    Maine? I didn't even know they fielded a football team before last year......

    Like I said in an earlier post.....it's OK to admit your team is in a rebuilding mode....and hasn't been a contender for some time.....


    ....I think we've all been there before.

    Like I said in a different thread, I have seen different things from different sources.

    I have no problem admitting we're in rebuilding mode, but to say OU isn't and they go 8-4 isn't something to be proud of.

    Leave a comment:


  • rcsodak
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick7
    Alright, if you think OU was marginally better last year even though our strength of schedule was practically the same, our record was the same, and you only beat us by a TD, then I don't understand you logic...
    OU - Strength of Schedule - #1

    Huskers - #36


    ....."practically the same"?

    Did you forget that TCU was a darling of the NCAA last year?
    I doubt they'd beat out OU in a best of 3, but they were pretty good last year.

    Maine? I didn't even know they fielded a football team before last year......

    Like I said in an earlier post.....it's OK to admit your team is in a rebuilding mode....and hasn't been a contender for some time.....


    ....I think we've all been there before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsolo
    LOL....nothing wrong with faith in your team. Whether it's blind or not(both for OU or Nebraska fans) remains to be seen. Here's to a all Big Red Big XII championship!!!!

    Amen.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhns
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsolo
    LOL....nothing wrong with faith in your team. Whether it's blind or not(both for OU or Nebraska fans) remains to be seen. Here's to a all Big Red Big XII championship!!!!
    Yeah I doubt either teams wins the national title or anything but now Nebraska gets to see what they paid for in the coach. He has to start winning now that he has his players starting instead of the option guys trying to play this west coast stuff. If he doesn't have a real good year though he will most likely get fired like all the other Husker coaches that dont win. I wish we could get Tom back.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsolo
    replied
    Originally posted by jhns
    Nothing last year but Nebraska is going to win a lot more now that the coach has his team playing. I was just getting excited and pre-celebrating.
    LOL....nothing wrong with faith in your team. Whether it's blind or not(both for OU or Nebraska fans) remains to be seen. Here's to a all Big Red Big XII championship!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • jhns
    replied
    Originally posted by mrsolo
    You won what?
    Nothing last year but Nebraska is going to win a lot more now that the coach has his team playing. I was just getting excited and pre-celebrating.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrsolo
    replied
    Originally posted by jhns
    We won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    You won what?

    Leave a comment:


  • jhns
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick7
    Alright, if you think OU was marginally better last year even though our strength of schedule was practically the same, our record was the same, and you only beat us by a TD, then I don't understand you logic...
    We won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by rcsodak
    Maybe the year after.....

    ...but counting wins against the likes of Maine, Wake, Pitt, Kansas St. & Colo, with losses to the likes of Kansas & Missouri, shouldn't be anything to 'brag' about.

    And to think.....the coach this numbskull replaced was 9-3 (?) his last year......
    Alright, if you think OU was marginally better last year even though our strength of schedule was practically the same, our record was the same, and you only beat us by a TD, then I don't understand you logic...

    Leave a comment:


  • rcsodak
    replied
    Originally posted by Nick7
    that's not the point, an 8-4 team is an 8-4 team (barring any major injuries/SOS differences).
    Maybe the year after.....

    ...but counting wins against the likes of Maine, Wake, Pitt, Kansas St. & Colo, with losses to the likes of Kansas & Missouri, shouldn't be anything to 'brag' about.

    And to think.....the coach this numbskull replaced was 9-3 (?) his last year......

    Leave a comment:


  • Nick7
    replied
    Originally posted by rcsodak
    Well, just who, exactly, is in the middle of a new coaching staff, scheme, etc.?

    I'd call that rebuilding......wouldn't you?


    Try it.......you'll sleep better at night>
    that's not the point, an 8-4 team is an 8-4 team (barring any major injuries/SOS differences).

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎