Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fight on Trojans!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Spyder
    The Big-10 and the SEC have went down and are overrated.
    This coming from a fan of a Pac-10 team.
    Go Huskers.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Nick7
      This coming from a fan of a Pac-10 team.
      Yeah.

      Oh, wait.

      I'm laughing with a Huskers fan.

      How good is that Big12 again?

      Outside of Texas, not really all that great.

      Oh, btw, I never bashed the SEC. I just said people overrate the conference.

      And I never said the Pac-10 was anything to be proud about.

      So....

      =}
      Last edited by Spyder; 05-05-2006, 12:52 AM.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #33
        I'll repeat what I said earlier - because of the nature of the violation (it was Bush's parents who received the benefit and it was paid by an agent, not the university or a donor) USC will probably get some sort of punishment but there is no way they will have to forfeit games, IMHO. Plus, let's not forget that neither Bush nor his family has to cooperate with the investigators as he is not longer under their authority. This makes the case a bit more difficult (though not impossible) to prove.

        As for the Jarrett scenario, this one is a lot more troubling. Again, I find it difficult to believe that they will have to forfeit games but, in a worse case scenario, Jarrett could be banned from playing this year.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Spyder
          Yeah.

          Oh, wait.

          I'm laughing with a Huskers fan.

          How good is that Big12 again?

          Outside of Texas, not really all that great.

          Oh, btw, I never bashed the SEC. I just said people overrate the conference.

          And I never said the Pac-10 was anything to be proud about.

          So....

          =}
          The Big12 has Nebraska and Oklahoma which are both better than USC and way more consistantly good over the years. Plus we don't have to pay talent to come in.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Calif. Bronco
            I'll repeat what I said earlier - because of the nature of the violation (it was Bush's parents who received the benefit and it was paid by an agent, not the university or a donor) USC will probably get some sort of punishment but there is no way they will have to forfeit games, IMHO. Plus, let's not forget that neither Bush nor his family has to cooperate with the investigators as he is not longer under their authority. This makes the case a bit more difficult (though not impossible) to prove.

            As for the Jarrett scenario, this one is a lot more troubling. Again, I find it difficult to believe that they will have to forfeit games but, in a worse case scenario, Jarrett could be banned from playing this year.
            The fact that their trophies and games will be taken away is not only because of Bush. They are also investigating a lot of other players that supposedly got money and gifts.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by jhns
              The Big12 has Nebraska and Oklahoma which are both better than USC and way more consistantly good over the years. Plus we don't have to pay talent to come in.
              1 - Who has more National Championships? USC or Oklahoma? USC or Nebraska?



              2 - Name a player USC has "paid." Forget all the hype and innuendos, name me one player that has been "paid" by the University of Southern California.

              Originally posted by jhns
              The fact that their trophies and games will be taken away is not only because of Bush. They are also investigating a lot of other players that supposedly got money and gifts.
              Do you have facts to back this up? Bush and Jarrett are the only two that have been reported anywhere reputable. And I will state it again - If you think USC will have "trophies and games" taken away you are seriously delusional.
              Last edited by Calif. Bronco; 05-05-2006, 03:20 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by jhns
                The Big12 has Nebraska and Oklahoma which are both better than USC and way more consistantly good over the years. Plus we don't have to pay talent to come in.
                yeah...

                USC's 11...to Oklahoma's 9...to Nebraska's 5..... hmm... yeah...
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #38
                  USC counts championships that weren't recognized nationally. Those numbers are inflated, all of them. It figures, considering the Trojans self engrandizing nature.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by deezan777
                    USC counts championships that weren't recognized nationally. Those numbers are inflated, all of them. It figures, considering the Trojans self engrandizing nature.
                    Definition of immaturity - People who, when shown facts that disagree with their opinions, resort to name calling.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Spyder
                      Yeah.

                      Oh, wait.

                      I'm laughing with a Huskers fan.

                      How good is that Big12 again?

                      Outside of Texas, not really all that great.

                      Oh, btw, I never bashed the SEC. I just said people overrate the conference.

                      And I never said the Pac-10 was anything to be proud about.

                      So....

                      =}

                      How good is the big 12? Well, our 8-4 beat your one loss Oregon.

                      That powerhouse UCLA beat Northwestern by less than two touchdowns.

                      Arizona State was able to squeak by....RUTGERS

                      California was able to keep BYU from coming back.

                      So in other words, YOU have no good team except for USC (who everyone knows was beaten by Notre Dame).

                      Questions?
                      Go Huskers.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Spyder
                        yeah...

                        USC's 11...to Oklahoma's 9...to Nebraska's 5..... hmm... yeah...
                        Also note that Nebraska and USC are tied for most in the past 35 years, when people actually cared about football.
                        Go Huskers.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Nick7
                          How good is the big 12? Well, our 8-4 beat your one loss Oregon.

                          That powerhouse UCLA beat Northwestern by less than two touchdowns.

                          Arizona State was able to squeak by....RUTGERS

                          California was able to keep BYU from coming back.

                          So in other words, YOU have no good team except for USC (who everyone knows was beaten by Notre Dame).

                          Questions?
                          me? ahahaha...yes..stop acting like i give a **** about the pac-10, son..

                          you act like i care what the other 9 times do...

                          i simply said people overrate the super SEC and the super Big10...i never said the Pac10 is a powerhouse conference...

                          oh, and the scoreboard said USC beat Notre Dame...no one is going to care about anything that happened that could've changed the outcome...
                          Last edited by Spyder; 05-05-2006, 07:56 PM.
                          sigpic

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Nick7
                            Also note that Nebraska and USC are tied for most in the past 35 years, when people actually cared about football.
                            when people actually cared about football? oh... yeah... they started caring because super Nebraska finally started winning some, huh? yeah...
                            sigpic

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Spyder
                              when people actually cared about football? oh... yeah... they started caring because super Nebraska finally started winning some, huh? yeah...
                              No, my point is, the majority of your national championships were half a century ago. Not to say that they didn't count, but they had no BCS or anythng making it a lot diffent. (ha h hll? mos of m ks ant okn)
                              Go Huskers.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                oh well...they're still in the record books...=}
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎