Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

sooners

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    ....at least better than Zach Taylor......




    ....I hear Beck is thinking about transferring to OU.......
    "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
    tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of
    men."

    -- Samuel Adams

    sigpicJacks RULE!!!!!!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by rcsodak
      ....at least better than Zach Taylor......




      ....I hear Beck is thinking about transferring to OU.......
      ??? Not even close. Just watch and learn. Taylor had all very young/ bad receivers last year with a lot of drops or them just missing the ball. Toward the end of the year when they started actually catching he tore up defenses. Just wait until this year and you will see how bad Taylor is. P.S. even with a bad receiving core he still had pretty good numbers that I am pretty sure where much better than Bomars with a lot less of a run game.

      Ok I just went and looked up the stats and you say Bomar is better??????

      Comp-Att-Perc-Yards-TDs-Ints-Rating

      Bomar = 167 - 308 - 54.2 - 2018 - 10 - 10 - 113.5
      Taylor = 237 - 430 - 55.1 - 2653 - 19 - 12 - 115.9

      I would say considering Taylor had a weaker run game and by far worse recievers, he showed he was a lot better than Bomar. http://www.sportsnetwork.com/default...2-Notebook.htm
      Good call though.
      Last edited by jhns; 08-07-2006, 08:25 AM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by jhns
        ??? Not even close. Just watch and learn. Taylor had all very young/ bad receivers last year with a lot of drops or them just missing the ball. Toward the end of the year when they started actually catching he tore up defenses. Just wait until this year and you will see how bad Taylor is. P.S. even with a bad receiving core he still had pretty good numbers that I am pretty sure where much better than Bomars with a lot less of a run game.

        Ok I just went and looked up the stats and you say Bomar is better??????

        Comp-Att-Perc-Yards-TDs-Ints-Rating

        Bomar = 167 - 308 - 54.2 - 2018 - 10 - 10 - 113.5
        Taylor = 237 - 430 - 55.1 - 2653 - 19 - 12 - 115.9

        I would say considering Taylor had a weaker run game and by far worse recievers, he showed he was a lot better than Bomar. http://www.sportsnetwork.com/default...2-Notebook.htm
        Good call though.

        How dare you play that card, jhns?

        Everyone knows that it isn't fair, being Bomar is much younger, although he's only younger by a year (which someone should tell him. I think he temporarily forgot a few times).

        Besides, Taylor is from OK making it so that we stole their QB...
        Go Huskers.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by Nick7
          How dare you play that card, jhns?

          Everyone knows that it isn't fair, being Bomar is much younger, although he's only younger by a year (which someone should tell him. I think he temporarily forgot a few times).

          Besides, Taylor is from OK making it so that we stole their QB...
          So, I don't care if you stole him. We steal from Texas all the time.


          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Broncos72690
            So, I don't care if you stole him. We steal from Texas all the time.
            I was making a crack at how Sooner fans seem to think we stole Taylor, even though he never played for OU.
            Go Huskers.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Nick7
              I was making a crack at how Sooner fans seem to think we stole Taylor, even though he never played for OU.
              I never thought you guys stole Taylor because we had Bomar. But now Bomar is gone, but I don't think you stole him. That's how you recruit.


              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by jhns
                ??? Not even close. Just watch and learn. Taylor had all very young/ bad receivers last year with a lot of drops or them just missing the ball. Toward the end of the year when they started actually catching he tore up defenses. Just wait until this year and you will see how bad Taylor is. P.S. even with a bad receiving core he still had pretty good numbers that I am pretty sure where much better than Bomars with a lot less of a run game.

                Ok I just went and looked up the stats and you say Bomar is better??????

                Comp-Att-Perc-Yards-TDs-Ints-Rating

                Bomar = 167 - 308 - 54.2 - 2018 - 10 - 10 - 113.5
                Taylor = 237 - 430 - 55.1 - 2653 - 19 - 12 - 115.9

                I would say considering Taylor had a weaker run game and by far worse recievers, he showed he was a lot better than Bomar. http://www.sportsnetwork.com/default...2-Notebook.htm
                Good call though.
                Well, not that it matters any more, but I'd say your 'stats' are more telling of how Taylor is just average.
                Bomar didn't have an Oline. Plus, since you keep forgetting, he was a FRESHMAN. He doesn't have 2 yrs under his belt playing at college speed, like Taylor did. Plus, he was also throwing it to FRESHMEN.
                Honestly, you'd have been better off just giving us your opine......

                2.4QB rating differential between a JR and a FR?

                Yeah.....taylor's all that.....
                "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
                tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of
                men."

                -- Samuel Adams

                sigpicJacks RULE!!!!!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by rcsodak
                  Well, not that it matters any more, but I'd say your 'stats' are more telling of how Taylor is just average.
                  Bomar didn't have an Oline. Plus, since you keep forgetting, he was a FRESHMAN. He doesn't have 2 yrs under his belt playing at college speed, like Taylor did. Plus, he was also throwing it to FRESHMEN.
                  Honestly, you'd have been better off just giving us your opine......

                  2.4QB rating differential between a JR and a FR?

                  Yeah.....taylor's all that.....
                  Taylor was also throwing to FRESHMEN. That is a pretty lame excuse when it goes both ways.

                  70 more completions, 640 more yards, and 9 more TD's is a big difference. Who cares if they had a close QB rating. How does that matter at all? Bomar was obviously far worse because they decided to not let him throw nearly as much. There are a lot more to the stats than just the qb rating. Also, who ever said Taylor was anything special? The only thing said was that he is better than Bomar. Taylor had far worse recievers and running game. I do not get where you think the two even compare.

                  So now while you are defending him, where is he now? I will bet you anything that Taylor once again has a better year than Bomar. I will even add to that and say I will guarantee you Taylor has a better year this year than Bomar ever has.

                  Also, I almost forgot. You do know that Taylor came from junior college right? Last year was his only year playing at this level and speed. Please do a little bit of research if you are going to make an argument so you at least can sound like you know partially what you are talking about.

                  Junior college is playing against all of the high school kids that couldn't make it to a real football team so I don't even want to see an argument that he had experience at a higher level.

                  You are pretty much saying because only the QB rating is so close that they are close in talent....

                  If you go by that then you are saying Plummer was as good as Tom Brady last season because they have about the same difference in passer rating. Don't you think that statement sounds a little dumb? If not then whatever, Plummer is as good as Brady and Bomar is as good as Taylor. Good logical answer.
                  Last edited by jhns; 08-22-2006, 06:57 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by jhns
                    Taylor was also throwing to FRESHMEN. That is a pretty lame excuse when it goes both ways.

                    70 more completions, 640 more yards, and 9 more TD's is a big difference. Who cares if they had a close QB rating. How does that matter at all? Bomar was obviously far worse because they decided to not let him throw nearly as much. There are a lot more to the stats than just the qb rating. Also, who ever said Taylor was anything special? The only thing said was that he is better than Bomar. Taylor had far worse recievers and running game. I do not get where you think the two even compare.

                    So now while you are defending him, where is he now? I will bet you anything that Taylor once again has a better year than Bomar. I will even add to that and say I will guarantee you Taylor has a better year this year than Bomar ever has.

                    Also, I almost forgot. You do know that Taylor came from junior college right? Last year was his only year playing at this level and speed. Please do a little bit of research if you are going to make an argument so you at least can sound like you know partially what you are talking about.

                    Junior college is playing against all of the high school kids that couldn't make it to a real football team so I don't even want to see an argument that he had experience at a higher level.

                    You are pretty much saying because only the QB rating is so close that they are close in talent....

                    If you go by that then you are saying Plummer was as good as Tom Brady last season because they have about the same difference in passer rating. Don't you think that statement sounds a little dumb? If not then whatever, Plummer is as good as Brady and Bomar is as good as Taylor. Good logical answer.
                    Jnhs that's the grand educational system of Oklahoma at work. No attention to detail is necessary.
                    Last edited by TXBRONC; 08-22-2006, 08:30 AM.
                    John 11: 25-27

                    My Adopt-A-Bronco is D.J. Williams



                    Thanks Snk16

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by jhns
                      Taylor was also throwing to FRESHMEN. That is a pretty lame excuse when it goes both ways.

                      70 more completions, 640 more yards, and 9 more TD's is a big difference. Who cares if they had a close QB rating. How does that matter at all? Bomar was obviously far worse because they decided to not let him throw nearly as much. There are a lot more to the stats than just the qb rating. Also, who ever said Taylor was anything special? The only thing said was that he is better than Bomar. Taylor had far worse recievers and running game. I do not get where you think the two even compare.

                      So now while you are defending him, where is he now? I will bet you anything that Taylor once again has a better year than Bomar. I will even add to that and say I will guarantee you Taylor has a better year this year than Bomar ever has.

                      Also, I almost forgot. You do know that Taylor came from junior college right? Last year was his only year playing at this level and speed. Please do a little bit of research if you are going to make an argument so you at least can sound like you know partially what you are talking about.

                      Junior college is playing against all of the high school kids that couldn't make it to a real football team so I don't even want to see an argument that he had experience at a higher level.

                      You are pretty much saying because only the QB rating is so close that they are close in talent....

                      If you go by that then you are saying Plummer was as good as Tom Brady last season because they have about the same difference in passer rating. Don't you think that statement sounds a little dumb? If not then whatever, Plummer is as good as Brady and Bomar is as good as Taylor. Good logical answer.
                      are you still going after this? why bomar is an idiot he has already proved it.he's gone from the team.he played for the sooners sure sooner fans are going to have his back.you have callahan's back don't you and we all know the guy is a moron and a jackass.taylor is not that special you have said that yourself. you sound like a chiefs fan trying to tell people trent green is a great qb.by the way too bad taylor didn't throw one of those supposed 9 td passes to help aksarben beat OU last year.and the same goes for brady vs plummer.in the games against each other i think jake 2 more td passes than brady.broncos beat patriots twice last year.i think we have found another jake hater maybe.
                      elway going to save the broncos again.yes!

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Bomar is gone. Why are we still talking about him?

                        I don't care what he did anymore.


                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Broncos72690
                          the oklahoma sooners will be the national champions this year. adrian peterson will win the heisman.
                          Oklahoma isn't even the best team in their conference. Sorry, I'll pass on that one.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by jhns
                            Taylor was also throwing to FRESHMEN. That is a pretty lame excuse when it goes both ways.

                            70 more completions, 640 more yards, and 9 more TD's is a big difference. Who cares if they had a close QB rating. How does that matter at all? Bomar was obviously far worse because they decided to not let him throw nearly as much. There are a lot more to the stats than just the qb rating. Also, who ever said Taylor was anything special? The only thing said was that he is better than Bomar. Taylor had far worse recievers and running game. I do not get where you think the two even compare.

                            So now while you are defending him, where is he now? I will bet you anything that Taylor once again has a better year than Bomar. I will even add to that and say I will guarantee you Taylor has a better year this year than Bomar ever has.

                            Also, I almost forgot. You do know that Taylor came from junior college right? Last year was his only year playing at this level and speed. Please do a little bit of research if you are going to make an argument so you at least can sound like you know partially what you are talking about.

                            Junior college is playing against all of the high school kids that couldn't make it to a real football team so I don't even want to see an argument that he had experience at a higher level.

                            You are pretty much saying because only the QB rating is so close that they are close in talent....

                            If you go by that then you are saying Plummer was as good as Tom Brady last season because they have about the same difference in passer rating. Don't you think that statement sounds a little dumb? If not then whatever, Plummer is as good as Brady and Bomar is as good as Taylor. Good logical answer.
                            Getting rather offensive, jns.....must've made my point.
                            Last I knew, junior COLLEGE was NOT high school (note the capitalized letters).
                            One team (fuskers) is a passing team (like indy), whereas the other (OU) is a running team (ala denver). Does plummer have the same kind of numbers as manning?

                            Before you attempt to make this an argument of intellligence, I suggest you pinch yourself and wake up first.

                            This thread WAS being conducted with mature posts.....


                            ...thanks for dropping it down a rung. :clap:

                            ps. Also, re-read my first sentence, and TX, other than being unproven, since neither of us went there, aren't you being a tad hypocritical?
                            Last edited by rcsodak; 08-22-2006, 09:38 PM.
                            "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
                            tireless minority keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of
                            men."

                            -- Samuel Adams

                            sigpicJacks RULE!!!!!!

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by rcsodak
                              Getting rather offensive, jns.....must've made my point.
                              Last I knew, junior COLLEGE was NOT high school (note the capitalized letters).
                              One team (fuskers) is a passing team (like indy), whereas the other (OU) is a running team (ala denver). Does plummer have the same kind of numbers as manning?

                              Before you attempt to make this an argument of intellligence, I suggest you pinch yourself and wake up first.

                              This thread WAS being conducted with mature posts.....


                              ...thanks for dropping it down a rung. :clap:

                              ps. Also, re-read my first sentence, and TX, other than being unproven, since neither of us went there, aren't you being a tad hypocritical?
                              I'm the one being hypocritical? Hardly. I try not to insult other peoples intelligents or there educational background.
                              John 11: 25-27

                              My Adopt-A-Bronco is D.J. Williams



                              Thanks Snk16

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by rcsodak
                                Getting rather offensive, jns.....must've made my point.
                                Last I knew, junior COLLEGE was NOT high school (note the capitalized letters).
                                One team (fuskers) is a passing team (like indy), whereas the other (OU) is a running team (ala denver). Does plummer have the same kind of numbers as manning?

                                Before you attempt to make this an argument of intellligence, I suggest you pinch yourself and wake up first.

                                This thread WAS being conducted with mature posts.....


                                ...thanks for dropping it down a rung. :clap:

                                ps. Also, re-read my first sentence, and TX, other than being unproven, since neither of us went there, aren't you being a tad hypocritical?
                                Start showing me the mature posts then. Junior college is a bunch of guys that couldn't make it into a good college which = worse than high school which at least still has the players making it into division 1a schools. GJ THOUGH with your great logic. Who cares what the team is. Both QB's played their first season as starter in this league and Taylor did better in ALL categories. I don't get where you don't see that but I guess some people are just blatantly blinded by homerism.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎