If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
If the commish is going to suspend a player for 4 games for taking HGH/steriods to gain an advantage over the other team, how many games should a head coach get for giving his entire team an advantage over the other team by video taping the defensive coaches and possibly stealing the radio signals?
If the commish is going to suspend a player for 4 games for taking HGH/steriods to gain an advantage over the other team, how many games should a head coach get for giving his entire team an advantage over the other team by video taping the defensive coaches and possibly stealing the radio signals?
Based on one player getting four games and the fact that the CHEATERS (we really need to come up with a new logo for the franchise in New England) were warned prior to this happening, I think he should get a minimum of 4 games and wishfully thinking the rest of the season.
So when teams watch film of their opponents in preparation for a game do they watch an edited version of what was broadcasted live?
They watching several different angles, not just the telecast. They ARE NOT watching video of the coaches on the sideline. Even if they are, what the coaches do signal wise changes from game to game.
So when teams watch film of their opponents in preparation for a game do they watch an edited version of what was broadcasted live?
thats perfectly legal to do. You can watch any public broadcast of the game, and try to pick up on signals or audibles.... but you can't hire a camera man, and give the tape to the coaches THAT VERY GAME.. which is what the Patriots got caught doing.
thats perfectly legal to do. You can watch any public broadcast of the game, and try to pick up on signals or audibles.... but you can't hire a camera man, and give the tape to the coaches THAT VERY GAME.. which is what the Patriots got caught doing.
If they could figure out even a few signals at halftime that would give them a huge advantage....
People are really trying to downplay the severity of what the Pats did, but the bottom line is they attempted to gain an unfairadvantage after they had been A) warned and B) Caught once before.
Shrek laid it down about as perfect as you can on NFL Live today. Turn on SC if you havent heard it.
People are really trying to downplay the severity of what the Pats did, but the bottom line is they attempted to gain an unfairadvantage after they had been A) warned and B) Caught once before.
Shrek laid it down about as perfect as you can on NFL Live today. Turn on SC if you havent heard it.
I don't find it to be a coincidence, that the Patriots have been caught doing this before... the Commissioner was sure to give a warning to all the teams about abiding to he rules of cheating (about this SPECIFIC RULE) before the season, and THEN the Patriots were caught in GAME ONE of the season. They were looking for it. The Commish KNEW to look for it.. and there is a reason they knew to look for it.
It can't be a slap on the wrist. THe difference is... how much WE think is a slap on the wrist compared to what the NFL considers a slap on the wrist.
People are really trying to downplay the severity of what the Pats did, but the bottom line is they attempted to gain an unfairadvantage after they had been A) warned and B) Caught once before.
Shrek laid it down about as perfect as you can on NFL Live today. Turn on SC if you havent heard it.
Do you think I'm trying to downplay this? I'm very serious about it. I posted this before I listened to Stink's comments on ESPNews. Mark Schlereth said it best that it is an unfair advantage. Just like using HGH. Schlereth also pointed out how the Patsies are the smartes team; always in the right spot; they just get it. Now all of a sudden we are starting to think: "Did they have an unfair advantage?"
Just posted by Adam Schefter:
According to Adam Schefter:
...the league plans on summoning New England coach Bill Belichick to its offices in New York this week to discuss the matter, and that possible punishment being considered by the NFL include fines, loss of draft picks and suspensions.
If the discipline the Pats, then we ought to do the same to Broncos,
Bronco Fans should remember a couple of facts
1. They are notorious for chopping block on their offensive line. Without that Terrell Owens never would have been able to carry that chump Elway to a championship.
2. Most of the games between Pats and Broncos have been played in Denver, because Broncos need that homefield advantage of the thin air.
3. Patriots have complained in the past about poor treatment in Denver. They did not get sufficient practice time on the field and they didn't get sufficient oygen.
4. Bill Polian and the Colts only win, because he is on the rules committee. Every year he concocts a new rule to beat them. Last year he even bought the Refs.
1. They are notorious for chopping block on their offensive line. Without that Terrell Owens never would have been able to carry that chump Elway to a championship.
2. Most of the games between Pats and Broncos have been played in Denver, because Broncos need that homefield advantage of the thin air.
3. Patriots have complained in the past about poor treatment in Denver. They did not get sufficient practice time on the field and they didn't get sufficient oygen.
4. Bill Polian and the Colts only win, because he is on the rules committee. Every year he concocts a new rule to beat them. Last year he even bought the Refs.
You are a bona fide idiot. Terrell Davis, by the way, moron.
1. They are notorious for chopping block on their offensive line. Without that Terrell Davis never would have been able to carry that chump Elway to a championship.
2. Most of the games between Pats and Broncos have been played in Denver, because Broncos need that homefield advantage of the thin air.
3. Patriots have complained in the past about poor treatment in Denver. They did not get sufficient practice time on the field and they didn't get sufficient oygen.
4. Bill Polian and the Colts only win, because he is on the rules committee. Every year he concocts a new rule to beat them. Last year he even bought the Refs.
You forgot to mention how Shanny took Javon Walker hostage last year and wouldn't allow him to visit NE. Isn't kidnapping a Federal Offense?
Shanny should have been suspended and docked draft picks.
Tweet
Comment