Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For all of you who think the refs called a good game.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For all of you who think the refs called a good game.



    Terry McAulay should be headed to Disney World this morning. He should be the toast of Pittsburgh, a guest on PTI and Jim Rome's Jungle and driving whatever luxury vehicle that is awarded to the Super Bowl's MVP.

    McAulay outshined Santonio Holmes, James Harrison, Big Ben Roethlisberger, Larry Fitzgerald and Kurt Warner.

    Fitzgerald and Warner ruled the fourth quarter, erasing a 13-point deficit with two clutch TD connections.

    Harrison uncorked one unforgettable play, trucking 100 yards with an interception just before halftime, and sporadically causing Arizona tackle Mike Gandy to illegally use a lasso.

    But on a play-to-play, quarter-to-quarter basis, no one influenced the greatest Super Bowl in history more than McAulay and his crew of black-and-gold-wearing, I mean, black-and-white-wearing officials.

    For the Cardinals, it was 11-on-17 for much of the evening. Had Bobby Knight been patrolling the Arizona sidelines rather than Ken Whisenhunt, the basketball coaching legend would've gotten teed up in the first quarter and ejected for tossing a chair by the time McAulay flagged Karlos Dansby for roughing Big Ben in the third quarter.

    I admit the Cardinals were sloppy, and leaving Gandy one-on-one with the league's most valuable defensive player was a gigantic strategic error. Harrison drew three holding penalties on I-69, the Arizona superhighway to Kurt Warner Drive.

    But the 11-7 penalty disparity was actually much worse when you consider McAulay and Co. turned flag-happy in the fourth quarter, dropping six yellow ones on the Steelers (Arizona declined one) to close the gap.

    And let's also keep in mind it wasn't just the 106 penalty yards marked against the Cardinals. The eye in the sky caught McAulay's crew favoring Pittsburgh twice, overturning two bad calls after replay review.

    And then there were the things the refs didn't call. Big Ben got away with an obvious intentional grounding. On the series after the refs handed Pittsburgh a 16-play, clock-killing third-quarter drive with a bogus roughing-the-passer call and a should-have-been-ignored roughing-the-holder penalty, McAulay ignored Harrison's brutal (and late) head shot on Kurt Warner. Holmes could've been penalized for his theatrical end-zone celebration. And Warner's fumble should've been thoroughly reviewed.

    Did the better team win the game? Absolutely.

    The Cardinals had no answer for Harrison. He made the biggest play of the game, a one-man 14-point swing that stopped the Cardinals from leading at halftime. The Steelers took Fitzgerald out of the game for three quarters with bump coverage and safety-over-the-top help.

    And Big Ben engineered the most impressive postseason two-minute drive since The Drive that established John Elway as a legend.

    Let's call this The Big End.

    Big Ben's Big End was more electrifying than Elway's 98-yard march to glory, and, of course, Ben's End came on a much larger stage. Officially listed at 78 yards, The Big End actually measured 88 yards. McAulay's crew flagged the Steelers into a first-and-20 hole at their own 12, catching a Steeler guard holding on first down.

    That was no problem for Roethlisberger. He danced away from the Arizona pass rush and tagged Holmes with a 14-yard strike that kick-started The Big End. From there, it was relatively easy. Roethlisberger and Holmes found a cavity in an Arizona zone, made a safety pay for losing his footing and put the Steelers in scoring position with a 40-yard catch-and-run. The leaping, toes-tapping, game-icing grab in the back of the end zone was nothing.

    Roethlisberger is without a doubt the most nimble big-man passer we've ever seen. Elway, Steve Young and Donovan McNabb were/are compact scramblers who could/can wing it with the best. Big Ben is 6-foot-5, 240 pounds. He's a blend of Tom Brady and Vince Young. Roethlisberger doesn't pass as accurately as Brady or move as swiftly as Young, but Ben throws, slides, surveys and improvises in combination better than anyone.

    He's a modern-day Roger Staubach.

    That makes sense. The Steelers are the new America's Team. They've won six Super Bowls, one more than the Cowboys and the 49ers. Pittsburgh's last two championships have been hand-delivered by overzealous officiating crews. Yeah, I'm sure Arizona fans will receive sympathy cards from Seahawks fans.

    The difference between Super Bowl XLIII and XL — a 21-10 dud — is that Sunday's wild, dramatic, fourth-quarter finish erased an annoying officiating performance that nearly stood in the way of the Steelers and the Cardinals making magic.

    You can e-mail Jason Whitlock at [email protected]
    Originally posted by PowderAddict
    I think the funny thing is that he's had his jerseys burned in TWO different cities
    However, in the gamble that is the NFL draft, we'll roll the dice on the proven and unmatched passing talent of Tebow rather than on the sorry track record of pro football talent evaluators.
    http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...rterbacks.html



    Sign your CPs, I will return the favor!!

  • #2
    The notion that the refs were biased towards the Steelers is ridiculous.

    1. The Cardinals only had 4 more penalties than the Steelers.
    2. Not one of the penalties were wrong.
    3. If the refs were biassed they would have called the Big Ben TD a TD...
    4. They would not have called the holding call in the endzone that resulted in a 9 point Cardinal swing.
    5. The final drive there wasn't one call against the Cardinals that could have helped the Steelers and in fact there was a holding call that went against the Steelers.

    I honestly think Bronco fans complaining about the Steelers are jealous.
    [IMG]

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by StugotsII View Post
      The notion that the refs were biased towards the Steelers is ridiculous.

      1. The Cardinals only had 4 more penalties than the Steelers.
      2. Not one of the penalties were wrong.
      3. If the refs were biassed they would have called the Big Ben TD a TD...
      4. They would not have called the holding call in the endzone that resulted in a 9 point Cardinal swing.
      5. The final drive there wasn't one call against the Cardinals that could have helped the Steelers and in fact there was a holding call that went against the Steelers.

      I honestly think Bronco fans complaining about the Steelers are jealous.
      Mmmmmmmm... yeah, that RTP penalty against AZ was questionable. Not calling the 15 yards on Holmes for using the ball as a prop -- an automatic call -- was questionable. All in all, the officiating wasn't horrible, but a 15 yard penalty would put the Cards at the 45 yard line after the kickoff... with two timeouts and 35 seconds left on the clock, a LOT could have been different. Saying that there was "No" problem with the calls is a bit much... just like saying the refs cost the Cards the Super Bowl.
      In Manning I trust.

      Comment


      • #4
        Sadly the officiating was a little biased. To say human beings (refs) do not favor a certain team is stupid. However there will always be some people, even here, that will deny that the game was anything more than 50/50.

        It wasn't hugely in favor of the steelers, but it did contribute to the outcome. That final drive was ridiculous.


        /In before the "Screw you you're wrong! refs only ref 50/50!" comments come.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by TheRealMoose View Post
          Mmmmmmmm... yeah, that RTP penalty against AZ was questionable. Not calling the 15 yards on Holmes for using the ball as a prop -- an automatic call -- was questionable. All in all, the officiating wasn't horrible, but a 15 yard penalty would put the Cards at the 45 yard line after the kickoff... with two timeouts and 35 seconds left on the clock, a LOT could have been different. Saying that there was "No" problem with the calls is a bit much... just like saying the refs cost the Cards the Super Bowl.
          Why do you and others have such a problem with last nights game?

          The refs did not cost the Cards the Super Bowl...there lack of offense in the first half and their defens in the final 2:37 cost them the game.

          Saying the refs cost the Cards the Super Bowl is wrong. Saying the refs caused the Bolts to lose in week to is more accurate.
          [IMG]

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by broncofanatik View Post
            Sadly the officiating was a little biased. To say human beings (refs) do not favor a certain team is stupid. However there will always be some people, even here, that will deny that the game was anything more than 50/50.

            It wasn't hugely in favor of the steelers, but it did contribute to the outcome. That final drive was ridiculous.


            /In before the "Screw you you're wrong! refs only ref 50/50!" comments come.
            What was wrong with the officiating in the final drive??????

            The Steelers marched right down the field...even with getting called for a holding penalty.


            The reason that the Cards had so many penalties was because they were the inferior team.

            They had a ton of holding calls because they couldn't block the Steeler blitz package.

            They were hitting people late because they couldn't stop the Steeler offense.
            [IMG]

            Comment


            • #7
              to all the bronco fans that say the refs won the game for the steelers...

              ill post it again...

              go back to week 2.. chargers vrs broncos...

              did the chargers have every chance under the sun to stop the broncos...

              this was the arguement every broncos fan threw at the chargers fans...

              now..

              did the cardinals have every chance under the sun to stop the steelers...

              id say they had way more opportunities..




              i guess it doesnt apply thou when your cheering for the other team that you think got the short end of the stick...
              sigpic

              sig by B4B6..

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by StugotsII View Post
                What was wrong with the officiating in the final drive??????

                The Steelers marched right down the field...even with getting called for a holding penalty.


                The reason that the Cards had so many penalties was because they were the inferior team.

                They had a ton of holding calls because they couldn't block the Steeler blitz package.

                They were hitting people late because they couldn't stop the Steeler offense.

                finally someone with a brain on here!

                Comment


                • #9
                  the refs were very biast harrison should have been tossed that was a classless display.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Refs weren't amazing, I mean the call on Rodgers-Cromartie for facemask, the roughing the passer (okay, that call was not the worst, but when you think about how fast dansby was running already he could hardly stop, he just pushed him over ;p) and the "Running over the holder" was a dreadful call, he can't just stop dead after running full pelt at the kicker.

                    Not the best called game, but not the worst. Steelers deserved it regardless.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by StugotsII View Post
                      Why do you and others have such a problem with last nights game?

                      The refs did not cost the Cards the Super Bowl...there lack of offense in the first half and their defens in the final 2:37 cost them the game.

                      Saying the refs cost the Cards the Super Bowl is wrong. Saying the refs caused the Bolts to lose in week to is more accurate.
                      Read the article it didnt say the refs cost the cards the super bowl it was saying it was just bad. Were there calls that were iffy? Absolutely. Did it affect the game no. The refs didnt affect it, the key factor in this game was Harrison owning Mike Gandy, and Woodley owning Levi Brown.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It's too bad Denver can't get to the SuperBowl.

                        They would have a real shot with the refs favor them game after game. They might even single handily win the game for them, again.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          the Reffing wasn't perfect last night, but it was about equally bad on both sides, rather than one sided. Overall the refs did a good job considering they don't get to see replays on anything other than challenges, and really they only missed a few big calls. Most of what they missed were personal foul type stuff, like the punch thrown by Harrison (he should get fined for that, most definitely).
                          Fire Rick Dennison - This Signature will stay until the worst playcaller in the NFL is gone.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X