If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Anthems and Protests ---
While we certainly understand the frustration by fans on all sides of the discussion, we have decided to keep the Broncos Country message boards separate from politics. Recent events have brought the NFL to the forefront of political debates, but due to the highly emotional and passionate discussion it tends to involve, we think it’s best to continue to keep politics and this forum separate. Yes, the forum is meant for discussion, but we’d like to keep that discussion to football as much as possible.
With everything going on in our country, it would be nice to keep our complaints and cheers purely related to football here. If you feel passionately, there are plenty of other outlets available to you to express your opinions. We know this isn’t the most popular decision, but we ask that you respect it.
Thank you for understanding.
--Broncos Country Message Board Staff
Yep. We're tied. We have the tiebreaker right now, but it's too early to even worry about that, considering we play again and they've got to play the Ravens twice.
Last Years Ravens>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>This Years Ravens
Are Cincy and Steelers tied for the division lead?
Yep. We're tied. We have the tiebreaker right now, but it's too early to even worry about that, considering we play again and they've got to play the Ravens twice.
Following is a list of the NFL teams, their record, and the winning percentage of their remaining opponents, in order of easiest to hardest:
1) Arizona (4-2), .333
2) New Orleans (6-0), .354
3) Seattle (2-4), .406 4) Cincinnati (5-2), .433
5) Jacksonville (3-3), .439
6) San Francisco (3-3), .443
7) Cleveland (1-6), .448
8) San Diego (3-3), .455
9) Miami (2-4), .463 10) Pittsburgh (5-2), .466
11) Houston (4-3), .474
12) Tennessee (0-6), .476
13) Detroit (1-5), .484 14t) Denver (6-0), .485
14t) Atlanta (4-2), .485
16) St. Louis (0-7), .491
17) Green Bay (4-2), .492
18t) Buffalo (3-4), .500
18t) Chicago (3-3), .500
18t) New York Jets (4-3), .500
21) Oakland (2-5), .508
22) Minnesota (6-1), .518
23) Dallas (4-2), .531 24) Indianapolis (6-0), .538 25) New England (5-2), .561
26) Kansas City (1-6), .576
27) Baltimore (3-3), .585
28) Tampa Bay (0-7), .618
29) Philadelphia (4-2), .619
30) New York Giants (5-2), .625
31) Carolina (2-4), .646
32) Washington (2-5), .679
AFC Division leaders are highlighted.
Things that make you go hmmmmm for the playoffs.
Wow, didn't know there were 5 division leaders in 4 divisions.
Its not really fair cause the broncos have a deflated schedule because of the cheifs and raiders. Ravens Steelers Giants Colts Eagels Chagers is harder than id say everybody except maybe the redskins.
I gotta be honest, I've always liked the Bengals. They're playing very well and they're looking very good. I expect to see them in the playoffs. I hope they come to Denver because I'd like to see that game.
Following is a list of the NFL teams, their record, and the winning percentage of their remaining opponents, in order of easiest to hardest:
1) Arizona (4-2), .333
2) New Orleans (6-0), .354
3) Seattle (2-4), .406 4) Cincinnati (5-2), .433
5) Jacksonville (3-3), .439
6) San Francisco (3-3), .443
7) Cleveland (1-6), .448
8) San Diego (3-3), .455
9) Miami (2-4), .463 10) Pittsburgh (5-2), .466
11) Houston (4-3), .474
12) Tennessee (0-6), .476
13) Detroit (1-5), .484 14t) Denver (6-0), .485
14t) Atlanta (4-2), .485
16) St. Louis (0-7), .491
17) Green Bay (4-2), .492
18t) Buffalo (3-4), .500
18t) Chicago (3-3), .500
18t) New York Jets (4-3), .500
21) Oakland (2-5), .508
22) Minnesota (6-1), .518
23) Dallas (4-2), .531 24) Indianapolis (6-0), .538 25) New England (5-2), .561
26) Kansas City (1-6), .576
27) Baltimore (3-3), .585
28) Tampa Bay (0-7), .618
29) Philadelphia (4-2), .619
30) New York Giants (5-2), .625
31) Carolina (2-4), .646
32) Washington (2-5), .679
Leave a comment: