Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quinn-Hillis Trade: Hillis pushes for starting spot with Browns

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • -Rod-
    replied
    Originally posted by BroncoFanDK View Post
    Lets try another angle on Hillis.

    He ended up in the "dog house" because he drew way to many penalties, he had some fumbles and he was in in short yard situations where he didn't perform.
    That's an intereting angle, especially considering that Hillis only has 1 fumble in his career. But nice try. Creative angle :thumb:

    And it's funny how a short yard failure for Hillis is his just fault, yet when it happens to Moreno the OL is to blame...

    Leave a comment:


  • PhillyBronco24
    replied
    Hmm hes still not taken in my ff league I might have to pick him up...

    Leave a comment:


  • pblack18707
    replied
    Originally posted by BRONCOS_OWN_U16 View Post
    so what. the trade was worth it at the time. we needed a back up qb.

    and the rb/fb position is one of the easier positions to find productive players. players like hillis can be replaced.
    yea and backup qb with quinns talent are a easy to find too. but i realy dont see too many rb/fb with a set of hand like hillis.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroncoFanDK
    replied
    Originally posted by kearly37 View Post
    BINGO! You hit the nail on the head --- he fumbled a couple of times and ended up in the doghouse (well, at fullback, which is pretty much the same thing in a primarily one-back offense).

    Fact is, Hillis is EXACTLY the type of player McD is always saying he likes --- tough, smart, versatile. Unfortunately, it appears that he's not always the most objective when it comes to evaluating talent.

    Let see ---

    Big-name first-round BUST of a QB who couldn't even beat out Derek Anderson (who?) in Cleveland vs. an over-achieving 7th-round steal who plays hard every play and who will do anything just to get on the field....

    Sorry, I just can't see how that trade made sense, other than the fact that it was before the draft and he had no idea who'd back up Orton (though I think Brandstater would have been fine, really) and he was tired of hearing the fans and the media talking about a player he had no intention of giving an actual shot.

    In any case, I'd take him over any of the FA scrap-pile refugees that are in our backfield for now while we wait on Buck and Knowshon to get healthy --- but you know the saying, "If wishes were horses..."
    Lets try another angle on Hillis.

    He ended up in the "dog house" because he drew way to many penalties, he had some fumbles and he was in in short yard situations where he didn't perform. Not at any time last year did he show that he should be a starter.

    Maybe Hillis had a harder than average comprehension of what the offense should do, and hence drew penalties. Josh runs a very complex system and maybe Hillis is tough (no argument there) but not as good at staying on assignment as some others.

    The coaches see the players every day, and it is clear that Josh did not see Hillis as a special RB.

    Leave a comment:


  • BRONCOS_OWN_U16
    replied
    Originally posted by pblack18707 View Post
    no but you did trade a productive player for one that is not.
    so what. the trade was worth it at the time. we needed a back up qb.

    and the rb/fb position is one of the easier positions to find productive players. players like hillis can be replaced.

    Leave a comment:


  • 12and4
    replied
    I'm still cheering for hillis.... and quinn....

    Leave a comment:


  • Alastor
    replied
    Originally posted by pblack18707 View Post
    dont know. how much would you give for a good backup running back right now?
    A lot.

    Sadly, I don't think Hillis qualifies.

    Moreno, Buckhalter, Clady and more will all be back for game 1 though. We'll also have Larsen and White comes in after week 4. So we'll have backs by season start.

    Look for Moreno to have a big opening day. There's a reason McDaniels kept running up the middle last Saturday, and it sure as Hell wasn't to get Fargas practice as a starter.

    Leave a comment:


  • pblack18707
    replied
    Originally posted by Alastor View Post
    Backup quarterbacks never matter.

    Until they come in during the second half of a game when the team has a 14 point lead and manages to piss it, and the playoffs, away as a result.

    If we had won that Washington game when Orton got injured, which we had WELL in hand at the time I might add, we'd have been in the post-season.

    How much does the backup matter now?
    dont know. how much would you give for a good backup running back right now?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alastor
    replied
    Originally posted by pblack18707 View Post
    no but you did trade a productive player for one that is not.
    Backup quarterbacks never matter.

    Until they come in during the second half of a game when the team has a 14 point lead and manages to piss it, and the playoffs, away as a result.

    If we had won that Washington game when Orton got injured, which we had WELL in hand at the time I might add, we'd have been in the post-season.

    How much does the backup matter now?

    Leave a comment:


  • pblack18707
    replied
    Originally posted by BRONCOS_OWN_U16 View Post
    why

    did we trade away some kind of future hall of fame RB?
    no but you did trade a productive player for one that is not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Apoc13
    replied
    Originally posted by greenyeti View Post
    I remember people bashing McD for trading cutler to chicago and getting Orton instead of gettin Quinn from Clevelan... good ol times

    Quinn will be a good backup, never a starter, but good enough backup
    you got tomorrow's lottery numbers too?

    Leave a comment:


  • Apoc13
    replied
    Originally posted by DancingHorsey View Post
    Oh noes, we traded an average back for a crappy backup! We're doomed!

    no kidding...one ok game and it's the worst trade in team history

    Leave a comment:


  • BRONCOS_OWN_U16
    replied
    Originally posted by jhildebrand View Post
    This is the kind of trade that ends up on one of those Top 10 shows that will not reflect kindly on the Broncos.
    why

    did we trade away some kind of future hall of fame RB?

    Leave a comment:


  • JCJE
    replied
    The thing that blows my mind is how many people get caught up in a players draft selection when looking at this trade. Oh Hillis was a 7th rd FB and Quin a 1st rd QB when what you really need is to look at the FILM. We all know what Hillis did as a rookie when he was given a chance and it was far better production than the 12th pick we wasted on Kno Mo.

    Conversely we have seen Quin in Cleveland and what did he really show when he was given a shot? Now throw in the picks and this trade just doesn't make sense to me.

    This is probably my biggest issue with McD, he's creating holes on this team that didn't exist instead of addressing the known ones. How many draft picks and FA moves have been wasted on positions that weren't a problem?

    Just a few that I think can be agrued.

    Cutler - he's traded and McD spent 3 picks to get TT and 2 picks plus a player to get BQ and 1 pick to get TB. That's 7 picks to replace what amounts to 2 players? How about the pick for Kno Mo and all of the wasted moves to bring in other RB scrubs when he could have utilized Hillis?

    I guess my point is IMHO he should have looked at what was largely the consensus issue (the defense) and worked on that instead of creating more issues on the team in general.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kansas Bob
    replied
    Originally posted by fraguela09 View Post



    Peyton Hillis pushes for starting spot with Browns

    I could push for a starting job with the Browns and I am a cripple!!!!!!!!


    Seriously, a change in senery can sometimes make a world of difference BUT he wasn't going to start for the Broncos so more power too him.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X