Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NFL.com: Should Green Bay Packers Weigh Jennings Trade?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NFL.com: Should Green Bay Packers Weigh Jennings Trade?

    If we could land Jennings for a second rounder, I think it would be wise to give him a good long look. Jennings is still as explosive as DT, but has more of a sudden burst and quickness to his game. He would instantly make our offense better coming out of the slot, imagine Jennings/Thomas/Decker. That would be lethal.

    To add on, I'd really only be content if we locked him up, either before the trade or when he got here, but resigning him would be a must.



    Greg Jennings has begun the final year of his contract and there doesn't seem to be much conversation between agent Eugene Parker and the Green Bay Packers. There are a few opposing thoughts on how to handle the situation.

    Milwaukee Journal Sentinel columnist Bob McGinn suggested trading him before the Oct. 30 deadline.
    NFL Network is your home for Thursday Night Football. Catch all the games live and in HD.

    This week ...
    Game: Bears at Packers
    When: Thursday, Sept. 13, 8 p.m. ET
    Watch: On NFL Network and NFL.com/LIVE

    For a complete Thursday Night Football schedule, go to NFL.com/TNF.

    Green Bay Press-Gazette columnist Pete Dougherty wrote the franchise tag should be considered.

    Jennings is in line for a big-time deal in 2013, whether it's from the Packers or another team. He's averaged 73 catches, 1,155 yards and 8.5 touchdowns per season the past four years and is one of the NFL's best route-runners and playmakers. There's no question whether Jennings deserves, as the kids say, racks on racks on racks. The question is: Can the Packers afford to splurge at their deepest position?

    In the next two years the Packers will have to pay quarterback Aaron Rodgers, linebacker Clay Matthews and nose tackle B.J. Raji. All three will command some of the highest dollar amounts of any player at their respective positions.

    Wide receiver Vincent Jackson signed with the Buccaneers for five years and $55.55 million, with $26 million guaranteed, during the offseason. Arizona Cardinals receiver Larry Fitzgerald has an eight-year, $120 million deal with $50 million guaranteed. The figures in Jennings' deal likely will fall between the numbers of those two.

    McGinn argues the Packers could land a second-round, and maybe a first-round, draft pick and save money to spend on the aforementioned trio and other members of the roster. High picks are precious in a draft-and-develop program.

    Dougherty approached it as a tag (probably $10 million in 2013) or walk decision.
    Rapoport: Week 2 game rankings
    Week 2 offers a bevy of highly enticing matchups, and Ian Rapoport is here to rank them. Which game claims No. 1? More ...

    It all comes down to general manager Ted Thompson. Jennings isn't giving a hometown discount on what will likely be his last major contract considering he turns 29-years old next week. Can Thompson make the math work to sign Jennings, Rodgers, Matthews and Raji to long-term deals? (I'm no capologist...) The team cannot lose the latter three.

    If it's impossible to keep all four, Jennings is the odd man out with Jordy Nelson, James Jones, Randall Cobb and Jermichael Finley as other pass-catching options. But the Packers are a Super Bowl contender right now. If that's the ultimate goal, can you trade your No. 1 receiver in the midst of this season? That's a future vs. present balancing act.

    You hate to see a Pro Bowl selection leave via free agency, but it happens. Especially when a team has developed premier talent. Ask the New England Patriots. Ask the Indianapolis Colts. Can't always pay everyone.

    I'd make one last run with Jennings in 2012, hopefully get a second ring in three years, make my best offer in the spring and live with the consequences. (Granted, I've yet to be offered a general manager position...)

    Best case scenario, a fifth Lombardi Trophy eases the pain of seeing Jennings in a different jersey in 2013.
    Fightin' Texas Aggie c/o '16

  • #2
    I like Greg Jennings, but he's almost 29 and is looking for Larry Fitzgerald-type money. I agree that our wide receiver group would be deadly with adding him, but the draft pick compensation coupled with Jennings' contract demands would be the reasons why I would not trade for him.


    sigpic


    FA Targets: DT Jason Jones, DT Pat Simms, S Reggie Smith, LB Dan Connor



    :cool:

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by getlynched47 View Post
      I like Greg Jennings, but he's almost 29 and is looking for Larry Fitzgerald-type money. I agree that our wide receiver group would be deadly with adding him, but the draft pick compensation coupled with Jennings' contract demands would be the reasons why I would not trade for him.
      The compensation mentioned was a bit generous IMO, nobody is giving up a first rounder for him, but I think a second or third could be good middlegrounds for landing Jennings. If what you say is true, about wanting Fitzgerald money, than that would nullify the whole deal in my opinion. If we could give him a 4 year $35M deal, with a second rounder, I think he would be worth it.
      Fightin' Texas Aggie c/o '16

      Comment


      • #4
        As much as I like Jennings, I wouldn't do it. If i'm going to trade a 2nd or 1st rd pick along with a hefty contract, i'm going after Victor Cruz, who will be a RFA after the season.
        sigpic

        Comment


        • #5
          A second rounder could get us this play making ability, and I could see each of these throws being made by Manning.
          Fightin' Texas Aggie c/o '16

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BroncoooJohnson View Post
            The compensation mentioned was a bit generous IMO, nobody is giving up a first rounder for him, but I think a second or third could be good middlegrounds for landing Jennings. If what you say is true, about wanting Fitzgerald money, than that would nullify the whole deal in my opinion. If we could give him a 4 year $35M deal, with a second rounder, I think he would be worth it.
            Yeah I read a couple of articles yesterday saying that Greg Jennings wants Larry Fitzgerald-type money each year (about $15 million per season).

            I'll go back through my browser history and see if I can find those articles again when I get off of work. I don't believe the Packers will trade Jennings for less than a 2nd round pick because of how productive he is.


            sigpic


            FA Targets: DT Jason Jones, DT Pat Simms, S Reggie Smith, LB Dan Connor



            :cool:

            Comment


            • #7
              We have Peyton Manning who makes any receiver look good.

              We also already have 2 solid starters, where one of them is a big playmaker already.

              Don't want.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by xX-Bronco-Xx View Post
                We have Peyton Manning who makes any receiver look good.

                We also already have 2 solid starters, where one of them is a big playmaker already.

                Don't want.
                This statement is so false. But i'll leave it at that in respect to the OP and his thread.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  He is a great WR no doubt, but the money is needed elsewhere. Clady needs a new contract(at minimum gets the franchise tag) and Porter will need to be re-signed, and if he keeps his performance up from last week it will be pricey. The only chance we would have, is to have Doom restructure his contract. The money is just too much in this case IMO.
                  What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?
                  I don't know and I don't care

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by JayJack View Post
                    This statement is so false. But i'll leave it at that in respect to the OP and his thread.
                    It's not false just a different opinion than yours.

                    He's made receivers like Austin Collie, Anthony Gonzalez, and Brandon Stokley play at a different level when he was passing balls to them. They didn't do much after they split with Manning, well maybe besides Stokley and his Holy Stokley catch.

                    There's a lot more that I can't think of at the top of my head too, including tight ends.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Great receiver but not elite IMO and not worth 10M+ a year.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        No, b/c we have other players to re-sign in the near future.

                        And if we did get him, someone would be left out when it's time for a new deal. I wouldn't mind adding a WR, but not that big at the price it would cost.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Dirty Bird View Post
                          Great receiver but not elite IMO and not worth 10M+ a year.
                          Not worth 10+ mil, sarcasm?

                          He's easily worth that, and depends what you mean by elite. I think he's around as good as White.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I've always liked Jennings, and no question he's a good receiver. He just seems to lack the consistency you want out of an elite receiver though, he'll be great for a few games, then disappear for others. If he's demanding a Larry Fitzgerald type contract, then I want Fitzgerald type production.

                            One reason could be the offense he plays in, there's so many play-makers that he sometimes gets lost in shuffle, maybe in an offense where he'd be the go-to guy, he could put up some huge numbers.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              On further thought to this, I think we could float the idea around. I don't think we will be serious players, but as the team that will drive his value up. If he does become available I could see teams like the Chargers and Raiders (In desperate need of a legit #1) get involved.
                              What's the difference between ignorance and apathy?
                              I don't know and I don't care

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X