Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An interesting look at Brady vs. Manning from 05-on

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • An interesting look at Brady vs. Manning from 05-on

    Mind you this is not a bash Peyton or Brady thread ... I rank them BOTH in the top 3 all-time behind Montana and think they are the greatest rivalry in NFL history. Please take the time to read this post because I feel I make a good case here.

    I know these two are compared always with Brady usually winning like a 65/35 split with people who rank them, but take a look at some interesting points. Brady had success early on in his career. From 2000-2004 he looked like one of the biggest winners in history. I'm a firm believer, however, that alot of his success early on wasn't because of how superior he was, but the fact that he had a complete team that helped him throughout. They had one of the scariest D's in the entire NFL, a clutch kicker, and a QB who was a very good game manager at the time. Once spygate ended and they lost that great defense, he and the Patriots had struggles. Ever since 05, Brady had the same problem Manning did with having to do so much to keep your team in it. The Patriots were not balanced anymore and everything came down to whether or not Brady will do enough to get his team the win. He was the team and still is. Since 2005 here is how each of Brady's postseasons ended:

    2005: Lost to Denver in Divisional Round. Threw 2 picks and 1 TD.

    2006: Lost to The Colts in the AFC title game. Threw a pick on a game winning drive attempt against the Colts. He threw 1 TD and 1 INT.

    2007: Lost to The Giants in the Superbowl after going 16-0. Biggest ch.oke job ever. The scoring juggernauts were held to 14 points. Brady throws 1 whopping TD and doesn't have enough time to come back and win it.

    2008- INJURED

    2009- Lost to the Ravens in the Wildcard round. Brady throws 3 picks and 2 TD's and only throws for 150 yards.

    2010- Lost to The Jets in the divisional round. Throws 2 TD's and a pick, but it's not enough to get them the win.

    2011- Outplayed by Flacco in the AFC title game and then loses the Superbowl again to the Giants. Has an ok game with 2 TD's and an INT, but another stunning loss that he took little heat for.

    2012- Lost to the Ravens in the AFC title game. 1 TD and 2 INT's in the game ... Including a crucial pick in the endzone towards the end of the game.

    I don't know what all this "CLUTCH" talk comes from after his Superbowl win in 04? The guy had an excellent defense and great kicker those Superbowl years and once they relied on Brady to carry the team they haven't won since. I'm saying this because everyone gives Peyton grief about his playoff performance, but Brady isn't Mr. Clutch that alot of people portray him to be. Mannings D stepped up one year for him and that was the Superbowl year. Other then that the guy has had to carry all his teams on his back. And now you see after those years with a balanced team, there hasn't been much success.

    Peyton Manning from 05-on:

    2005: Lost to Steelers in a game where the kicker missed an easy field goal at end. Peyton takes all the grief as usual. 1 TD, 0 INT's.

    2006: Won The Superbowl and made an amazing comeback in the AFC title game against Brady. Threw for a TD and an INT in the Superbowl

    2007: Lost to the Chargers in a game where he threw 400 yards, 3 TD's, and 2 picks including a 4th quarter TD to get them the lead. Yet again Colts D sc.rews up and loses it for them.

    2008: Lost to the Chargers in a game where Manning threw a touchdown and no INT's. It went to overtime though where San Diego won the coin toss and scored on the first play. Manning didn't have a chance to perform a comeback

    2009: Got to the Superbowl and lost to New Orleans. Threw 330 yards, 1 TD, and 1 INT. Threw a pick 6 at the end when trying to tie it up. Tough break. His fault on that one.

    2010: Lost to the Jets in ANOTHER game where he got his team the lead in under a minute left in game and Special Teams and defense scr.ews it up and lets Sanchez drive down on them. Throws 1 TD, 0 INT's.

    2012: Lost to Ravens and threw 3 TD's and 2 INT's. Got his team the lead in the 4th quarter and forced Baltimore to use all there timeouts with only a minute left in the game. Denvers D scr.ews up and they go to overtime.

    ONE time out of those years it was Peyton's fault. But the ignorance of the media and people who dislike Peyton tend to take the easy way out and blame him.

    Since 05:

    Manning has 1 more Superbowl to Brady.

    Since 05 In those eliminations games mentioned above Peyton did more to try and get his team the win:

    Peyton: 11 TD's, 6 INT's.

    Brady: 9 TD's, 8 INT's.

    Bottom line is Peyton is looked at to be a cho.ker which he is far from. Look at those elimination games in the Peyton years I mentioned. Most of them were NOT his fault.

  • #2
    QB is the most important position but it proves you still need a great team to win it all.

    Comment


    • #3
      Agreed 100%. Look at the Pats there Superbowl years. Not the most talented team, but VERY balanced on defense, offense, and special teams. Brady was actually more of a game manager QB instead of a beast statistical juggernaut then too. The problem with New England since 05 and the problem Manning had most of his career is that when a team relies on you almost all the time, you don't win. And then when you lose you get all the blame. The word choker is thrown around an awful lot.

      Comment


      • #4
        If you count all the playoff games from 2005 on, Brady's numbers are :8-7, 32TDs, 21TOs. PM's numbers are: 6-4, 18TDs, 15TOs. I used wikipedia for these #s
        Last edited by HUMCALC; 02-14-2013, 09:27 PM.
        "Happiness is just an illusion, filled with sadness and confusion." Jimmy Ruffin

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by PManningTKO View Post
          Agreed 100%. Look at the Pats there Superbowl years. Not the most talented team, but VERY balanced on defense, offense, and special teams. Brady was actually more of a game manager QB instead of a beast statistical juggernaut then too. The problem with New England since 05 and the problem Manning had most of his career is that when a team relies on you almost all the time, you don't win. And then when you lose you get all the blame. The word choker is thrown around an awful lot.
          that's what I always say, and I don't know why people refuse to admit it. Brady ironically became a top QB in 2005, the year after the last time he won a SB

          Comment


          • #6
            You got to have balance to win a Superbowl. There is a reason why Peyton and Brady has one Superbowl combined since 05. Broncos could do it next year if they make minor adjustments on D.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by PManningTKO View Post
              Brady was actually more of a game manager QB instead of a beast statistical juggernaut then too.
              Thank you! Brady was truly a game manager when he got his first 2 superbowls, nothing more. New England had at the time probably the most clutch kicker in the NFL, and a very strong defense.

              Look at the QB stats for 2004 here: http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/pl...4/seasontype/2

              In 2004, Peyton Manning DOMINATED the league, he was in the top 3 for almost every quarterback stat. Brady was 17th in completion percentage, 15th in total yards, and had the 4th highest interceptions of all starting QBs (14). In 2004, Peyton Manning literally DOUBLED Tom Brady's touchdowns passes, 49 to 28.

              It annoys the hell outta me that people hold Brady so much higher because of the rings. Now granted, did Peyton have his chances in the post-season and blow it? yes, big time. But Tom Brady didn't do a whole lot when he won his first 2 superbowls, he was truly just a game manager.

              One stat folks might ignore when comparing these two QBs is the defenses they had. Tom Brady's 2004 superbowl defense was ranked 9th overall in the league. Peyton Manning's defense was ranked 29th overall. That's terrible. Do you guys remember that Pats 2004 superbowl defense?? it was loaded. Rodney Harrison, Tedy Bruschi, Mike Vrabel, Willie McGinest, Assante Samuel, Vincent Wilfork, Richard Seymour...holy crap! Peyton Manning never had a defense like that...

              Comment

              Working...
              X