Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jimmy Graham

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bgpatsfan
    replied
    Originally posted by captainbronco
    some peoples' children
    lol that's pretty bad... wasn't he an orphan and foster child?

    Leave a comment:


  • ERoyal248
    replied
    Originally posted by display name
    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ints-offseason
    I just find it comical how he is upset about the release of Sproles yet does not seem to grasp the concept that he is the reason for it.
    This is not true.

    Leave a comment:


  • captainbronco
    replied
    Originally posted by display name
    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-...ints-offseason
    I just find it comical how he is upset about the release of Sproles yet does not seem to grasp the concept that he is the reason for it.
    some peoples' children

    Leave a comment:


  • display name
    replied

    I just find it comical how he is upset about the release of Sproles yet does not seem to grasp the concept that he is the reason for it.

    Leave a comment:


  • beastlyskronk
    replied
    Originally posted by m3alley
    No thanks...worst blocking TE I've ever seen
    But he can easily block cbs out on the edge. He's a wr playing te

    Leave a comment:


  • m3alley
    replied
    No thanks...worst blocking TE I've ever seen

    Leave a comment:


  • beastlyskronk
    replied
    Originally posted by ERoyal248
    He's gonna cost 10-11 mil per year plus two 1's.

    Not exactly.
    Only 7 mil on the tag. Not quite sure how many years you can tag a player, but we could theoretically get him for at least 2 seasons at 7 mil apiece

    Leave a comment:


  • xX-Bronco-Xx
    replied
    There's a bunch of unrestricted FA's we could target for a way better price.

    I'm one of the few on here that would advocate two TE set but Graham seems like too much $$$.

    Leave a comment:


  • fallforward3y+
    replied
    Bad idea for Denver. The just had the best pass attack of all time, and their defense is suspect. They do say you can't have too many weapons, but if you have to shell out a lot of money for something you are already great at then yes you definitely can. Graham is a bit better over the middle than Thomas is, but Denver is pretty good in that area as well.

    They've got to get some defensive players if they want a championship.

    Leave a comment:


  • ERoyal248
    replied
    Originally posted by beastlyskronk
    Graham is essentially a wr, it'd be a cheap way to replace Decker cash wise. We'd have to trade a lot to get him though
    He's gonna cost 10-11 mil per year plus two 1's.

    Not exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • beastlyskronk
    replied
    Graham is essentially a wr, it'd be a cheap way to replace Decker cash wise. We'd have to trade a lot to get him though

    Leave a comment:


  • Peerless
    replied
    Would rather stick with Julius Thomas.

    Leave a comment:


  • ERoyal248
    replied
    Originally posted by Conner13
    Let's worry about getting a few decent players on defense before we worry about getting more offensive players.
    Some of them were on IR but yes, upgrading the defense should be the priority, not adding another expensive weapon.

    Offense should be fine even with losing Decker.

    Leave a comment:


  • crash123go
    replied
    Talk about a waste. You don't think graham is a liability in the run game? Jeez watch some saints games, he's worse then Julius at run blocking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Conner13
    replied
    Let's worry about getting a few decent players on defense before we worry about getting more offensive players.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎