Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Derek Carr has broken fibula
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hadez View PostBB has rested Gronk before when he was healthy...2014 season iirc
They have also rested players who could play to not further injure them and/or give a injury they playing with an additional week to heal.
NE is usually not in the habit of sitting a bunch of starters in regular season games to get ready for the playoffs. They may rest a few guys here and there who may have been dealing with injuries but not as a general rule.
Also, don't know if folks saw Brady's presser yesterday, they will be going full boar against MIA next week. They are not going to let up until the game is at hand like they did against the Jets. Only when the game was in hand did they let Jimmy G and others come in and play.Last edited by broncoslover115; 12-25-2016, 09:51 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by broncoslover115 View PostYup. BB usually doesn't rest players and NE hasn't locked up HFA just yet. They will beat MIA next week to make sure.
Brady hasn't won a road playoff game since 2006. They will make sure he doesn't have to.
They have also rested players who could play to not further injure them and/or give a injury they playing with an additional week to heal.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elway'sLegacy View PostCan't believe all of this ridiculous talk about NE resting their guys and, especially, tanking games.
No offense, but what world are you guys living on? Tanking DOES NOT HAPPEN in the NFL (just ask the Browns) and the concept of leaving out a team intentionally by giving up home field advantage through an intentional loss is ludicrous.
May not like exactly how the word was used but teams do things that one could call tanking depending on ones point of view, choice of words and how to make a point.
Leave a comment:
-
Spot #6
Case 1
Broncos beats the Chiefs, and
Broncos beats the Raiders, and
Steelers beats or ties the Ravens, and
Patriots beats the Dolphins, and
Chiefs beats or ties the Chargers
Case 2
Broncos beats the Chiefs, and
Broncos beats the Raiders, and
Patriots beats the Dolphins, and
Browns beats or ties the Steelers, and
Chiefs beats or ties the Chargers
Case 3
Broncos beats the Chiefs, and
Broncos beats the Raiders, and
Patriots beats the Dolphins, and
Bengals beats or ties the Ravens, and
Chiefs beats or ties the Chargers
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elway'sLegacy View PostCan't believe all of this ridiculous talk about NE resting their guys and, especially, tanking games.
No offense, but what world are you guys living on? Tanking DOES NOT HAPPEN in the NFL (just ask the Browns) and the concept of leaving out a team intentionally by giving up home field advantage through an intentional loss is ludicrous.
New England wants that #1 seed and they are not going to take any chances with it. Even though Oakland is starting a backup quarterback, they can still win that game - it's not outside the realm of possibility, heck it wouldn't even be surprising considering all the crazy things that happen not just during an NFL season, but WEEKLY.
Look back at the 2009 Patriots seasons in Week 17 when they played the Giants. Neither team had anything to play for but both played their starters and had what was the best game of the regular season (and ultimately a preview of the Super Bowl).
New England will play their starters against Miami next week and Belichek will be doing everything he can to win and lock up that #1 seed - thinking otherwise is insane and conspiracy theory type stuff.
Brady hasn't won a road playoff game since 2006. They will make sure he doesn't have to.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DenverBlood View PostThe only thing that got interesting is how easy it's going to be for Brady to get back to another SB
Leave a comment:
-
I hate the raiders with every ounce of my soul....but I feel for them...it really seemed it was their year....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by flosstein View PostThings just got interesting....................
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GiddyupGetEm View PostI mean New England will intentionally lose to Miami. Belichick did it last year so Denver would play Pittsburgh instead of his team. They fear Denver more than anyone but Pittsburgh.
Couldn't block. Ergo, they decided not to pass the ball at all to protect Brady.
MIA still barely won the game. This year is different. MIA has a backup QB and an injured RB and now they face a top 10 defense.
NE doesn't care, and if they "fear" PIT then they will do everything possible to beat MIA bc NE knows Denver has the better chance to win in PIT WC weekend.
So, why would they manipulate things last war bc of Pit but not this season?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GiddyupGetEm View PostI mean New England will intentionally lose to Miami. Belichick did it last year so Denver would play Pittsburgh instead of his team. They fear Denver more than anyone but Pittsburgh.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by fraguela09 View Post"But it came at a cost as Ajayi confirmed afterwards that he suffered an AC joint injury in his left shoulder resulting from a hit he took in the overtime period on a carry up the middle that set up the game-winning field goal."
MIA has a backup QB and now their RB is hurt.... NE didn't "rest" their guys last year, they just had a crappy OL and no RB so they went vanilla.
Even If Brady sits, Jimmy G gives them a chance. Knowing they have a BYE coming and knowing he has a real shot to win another SB, BILL will use this game to keep his team sharp.
Bill doesn't fear going to oAk if necessary but he also doesn't fear dEn coming to NE.... I bet he would enjoy ending MIA's season next week tho.
Leave a comment:
-
Can't believe all of this ridiculous talk about NE resting their guys and, especially, tanking games.
No offense, but what world are you guys living on? Tanking DOES NOT HAPPEN in the NFL (just ask the Browns) and the concept of leaving out a team intentionally by giving up home field advantage through an intentional loss is ludicrous.
New England wants that #1 seed and they are not going to take any chances with it. Even though Oakland is starting a backup quarterback, they can still win that game - it's not outside the realm of possibility, heck it wouldn't even be surprising considering all the crazy things that happen not just during an NFL season, but WEEKLY.
Look back at the 2009 Patriots seasons in Week 17 when they played the Giants. Neither team had anything to play for but both played their starters and had what was the best game of the regular season (and ultimately a preview of the Super Bowl).
New England will play their starters against Miami next week and Belichek will be doing everything he can to win and lock up that #1 seed - thinking otherwise is insane and conspiracy theory type stuff.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: