Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

why kc are hated in the nfl

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • why kc are hated in the nfl

    its a natural reaction for people to dislike a team that gets outplayed and then gets out of jail and kc do it alot. perfect examples are the denver and green bay matches. and oakland. and baltimore.

  • #2
    I'll take 19 lucky victories thank you very much.

    Comment


    • #3
      the bottle that spins has a million places to stop but cant stop up............or something like that?
      dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

      I tried to warn ya.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tahuya man
        A win is a win. In the end it makes no difference if you win 40-0 or 10-7, or if you win because of botched punt return.
        oh yes it does make a difference. i wouldnt appreciate a 10-7 win even though its a win it matters how it was done
        dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

        I tried to warn ya.

        Comment


        • #5
          of course any1 would take a win but the media go so over the top with kc and there fans buy it. they are definetly not the best team in the afc whatever there record shows. (btw - kc fans go on about the denver injuries as if they make no difference, i dont like ppl who make excuses for poor performances but if we r being honest than kc would have a worst record than .500 if they suffered the same as denver) also, i keep hearing this rubbish about new england coping with injuries. i like n.e. but they still have qb #1 not #3 and are no hit in the positions denver are.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by tahuya man
            If you went to 16-0 on 10-7 wins I think everyone would appreciate that. If you say you wouldn't....you are lying When you look at the NFL every week, most games are very close. Maybe two games end up being won by more than two TDs.
            naturally, you want to win, but in order to do that consistently, you have to have very good effort on both sides, in a 10-7 win, both sides did not have a good game. do you understand that? you have to be dominant to go 16-0 in the first place. luck can only carry you so far, never to a championship!
            dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

            I tried to warn ya.

            Comment


            • #7
              It's all nice coach speak to say guys have to step up when you have injuries, but if those players stepping up had the skills to be starters they wouldn't be back-up to begin with. You are rarely if ever going to see a second stringer play as well as a first, when you have multiple injuries you're whole team is down graded. The difference over the last 4 weeks is injuries. Would we have won allfour games, probably not, would we have won more than one, hell yes.

              KC has the best record at this point in the NFL, but that doesn't neccessarily make them the best overall team. They are not #1 in offense or defense but are doing just enough and getting the needed nreaks to win.
              The Game Day Thread: Year 17 in progress!!! sigpic

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by tahuya man
                If your team was 8-0 at the halfway point you would claim they are #1. KC is the best in the AFC right now until proven otherwise. Making claims about how other teams would cope with injuries is nonsensical. Players have made thier carreer by filling in for an injured player (Tom Brady anyone?) Claiming KC would be lower than 500 is wishfull thinking on your part. Also, N.E. had more starting players out than the Broncos did on Monday night.
                they werent on their 3 qb you know, the most important position on the team! also if we were 8-0 you better believe there would be people justifying our success especially if we went to other boards and bragged so dont try that
                dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

                I tried to warn ya.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by tahuya man
                  Also, N.E. had more starting players out than the Broncos did on Monday night.
                  lets see, they had their qb, rb, wr, all their lb, and their best safety? what the hell were you talking about? we mised our key qb wr LT two lb and they missed 1 key DT and a couple non vital positions? dont try that either!
                  Last edited by Return of Lava; 11-08-2003, 09:49 PM.
                  dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

                  I tried to warn ya.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    damn it. omg, ok let me see. you're a chief fan? ok, say you lose your 5 best players, thats preist holmes(speaking of average, plummer is to the broncos what holmes is to kc), whoever his backup is, dante hall, jonnie morton and shawn barber for 4 games, are you really 8-0? no, but of course you would be if you had them in right? thats all i'm sayin.
                    dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

                    I tried to warn ya.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      if you still dont get it you will when plummr gets back!!
                      dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

                      I tried to warn ya.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by tahuya man
                        First of all, I'm not a Chiefs fan at all. Priest Holmes is an MVP quality player, Plummer is not. Every team has to deal with injuries, period. Good teams have players step up and cover for the injured players, Denver hasn't maybe KC would.
                        well it doesnt matter whose fan you are you are defintly not a bronco fan. ask anybody who is the best for the broncos and youll get plummer! look at the record with and without him and tell me he isnt most valuable quality. if you want more proof than the record look at his numbers for the last 4 games he played in. 0 INT to 8 TD!!
                        dont let him pull dat move on ya, dont let him pull that move.......................oh no dats da move! TOUCHDOWN!!!

                        I tried to warn ya.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by tahuya man
                          Man, you're really hung up on this Plummer thing. I didn't see N.E. crying when they lost Bledsoe, they just went out and won the suoerbowl without him. Same when the Rams lost Trent Green, they just put the excuses aside and won with Warner. Like I said , good teams and coaching staffs adjust and drive on.
                          That's a good point. But both those teams had hidden gems at their backup QB spot that are still the starters and are better QB's than the guys who used to start in front of them.

                          Let's face it. The Broncos' backup QB's sucked. No hidden gems there. That's Shanny's fault for thinking Beuerlein's creaky old joints could still hurl the ball with accuracy. He'd better fix that problem next season. In the meantime, there's no doubt our offense is completely different now than when Jake was starting.
                          "You can't take the sky from me..."
                          ------
                          "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by tahuya man
                            I'd take Beuerlein as a back up any day. He's stepped in and done the job in the past as both a starter and back up. Injuries happen, tough luck. You're right if you're saying that Shanahan was not prepared and hasn't done a good job of dealing with his injuries.
                            Beuerlein was a great backup. Past tense. The dude's 38 years old and in his 17th season. His arm appeared on a serious decline and he was completely immobile in the backfield, a sitting duck. Again, the rest of our season pretty much rests on Plummer's health. I hope we have better backup QB's next season.
                            "You can't take the sky from me..."
                            ------
                            "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by tahuya man
                              I'd take Beuerlein as a back up any day. He's stepped in and done the job in the past as both a starter and back up. Injuries happen, tough luck. You're right if you're saying that Shanahan was not prepared and hasn't done a good job of dealing with his injuries.
                              You are not listening!!! It does not matter what team you support!!! Take any team in the NFL, take away their quarterback and 4 of the top players on that team. Tell me they are going to win games and I will tell you, you are crazy.
                              Go Broncos!!! - Hosea 10:12

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X