who would you rather have as a RB?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
better RB, LT or LJ
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GridironChampLT easily, unfortunatly LJ doesnt catch, block, or throwas good as LT. LJ and
LT can both make alot of nothing but in different situations.
Now if you were to ask who i'd want for 1 RUN, then i'd go LJ.
Sig by Sky.:salute:
All you nooby dooby doos need to stop making stupid threads.:coffee:
Comment
-
Originally posted by GridironChampLT easily, unfortunatly LJ doesnt catch, block, or throwas good as LT. LJ and
LT can both make alot of nothing but in different situations.
Now if you were to ask who i'd want for 1 RUN, then i'd go LJ.
even with that ....if the game was down to one play.....qb cant throw...one running down for the game..................you'd be a fool not to take LT
Lt is hands down the better backsigpicwhen do native Americans become human and not mascots
Comment
-
LT.. even for one play. Especially if that ONE play was from your own territory. LJ is a hard hitter and TOUGh runner, but he never can break the long ones without getting caught. LT on the other hand can take it to the house no matter where you are on the field.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ravage!!!LT.. even for one play. Especially if that ONE play was from your own territory. LJ is a hard hitter and TOUGh runner, but he never can break the long ones without getting caught. LT on the other hand can take it to the house no matter where you are on the field.
You cant go wrong either way, but the Chargers have by far a better run blocking
team than KC does. LT goes untouched for 5 yards a multitude of times, where as
LJ hardly makes 3 yards without being touched.
The onlyl reason i would take LJ for 1 run is the fact that he over doubles LT's yards
after contact, at least he had the last time i checked.Club Leader: Robert Griffin III > Andrew Luck
^^^Get used to it.^^^
Comment
-
LJ is great. Runs angry. Punishes one armed or shoe string tacklers.
But LT is not only the most complete back in the NFL,
not only the most complete offensive player in the NFL, and not only one of maybe 3 players in the NFL who in reality can not only alter gameplans, but alter games...
but I think he is the most complete back in NFL history. In my life time, the only one who did a little bit of everything better for more than 1 or two seasons was Walter Payton.
Roger Craig was as versatile, but was not as good for as long.
Barry Sanders was lightning in a bottle, but was a blocking and pass catching liability.
Curtis Martin and Jerome Bettis were quiet, workhorse types who were great, but gained yards in such a way that at the end of the game, you were surprised how much they did.
Eric ****erson was almost as good, but not quite able to line up wide like LT. I think he was faster though.
Emmitt Smith while the NFL's number one yardage gainer, was not as fast a runner, as good a pass cacther, nor as versatile a player as Tomlinson. Period.
Everybody's gotta elevate from the norm...
The greatest list of music I don't own on CD :sad:
You should check these guys out
Comment
-
Originally posted by AtwnbroncfanThis season proved a lot of LJ's yards come from his o-line. LT is better.
LJ had mroe yards after contact and less yards before being touched. LT went
untouched more often, no doubt some is from his running but alot is from his
blocking whereas KC had piss poor blocking and LJ still ended up with the second
most yards.Club Leader: Robert Griffin III > Andrew Luck
^^^Get used to it.^^^
Comment
Comment