Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wife of Ex-NFL Player Guilty of Rape

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wife of Ex-NFL Player Guilty of Rape

    7/17/2007 4:04:49 PM

    The wife of former Cincinnati Bengal lineman Tom Dinkel will be sentenced in August on third-degree rape charges.

    Jeni Dinkel, 51, has admitted to sexual activity with her son's 15-year-old friend during a wild party at the family home.

    Dinkel works as a Hollywood makeup artist when she's not at her home south of Cincinnati.

    Judge Gregory Bartlett said earlier this month that he thought the case was "too far off the norm" to accept a plea deal.

    He expressed concern over the fact that Dinkel continued to say the 15-year-old victim initiated the sexual contact.

    After hearing from the judge that she'd be sentenced sooner than she expected, Jeni Lee Dinkel left the courtroom in tears.

    It's a clear victory for the 15-year old victim's family who just wants the legal proceedings to get over quickly.

    "She just wanted to make sure that the bulk of this criminal thing could be done and over with before the school year starts so her son doesn't have this hanging over his head for the rest of the school year," said Rene Heinrich, the victim's attorney.

    The judge also ordered a sexual offender assessment to be done by the Kenton County Probation Department.

    Dinkel's attorneys had presented their own assessment.
    President of the GPA, Head of Mainland Europe Chapter




    formerly Officially Adopted by saltybuggah
    I adopted Skywalker

    I have been adopted by Chris Wade


  • #2
    Originally posted by Kapaibro
    7/17/2007 4:04:49 PM

    The wife of former Cincinnati Bengal lineman Tom Dinkel will be sentenced in August on third-degree rape charges.

    Jeni Dinkel, 51, has admitted to sexual activity with her son's 15-year-old friend during a wild party at the family home.

    Dinkel works as a Hollywood makeup artist when she's not at her home south of Cincinnati.

    Judge Gregory Bartlett said earlier this month that he thought the case was "too far off the norm" to accept a plea deal.

    He expressed concern over the fact that Dinkel continued to say the 15-year-old victim initiated the sexual contact.

    After hearing from the judge that she'd be sentenced sooner than she expected, Jeni Lee Dinkel left the courtroom in tears.

    It's a clear victory for the 15-year old victim's family who just wants the legal proceedings to get over quickly.

    "She just wanted to make sure that the bulk of this criminal thing could be done and over with before the school year starts so her son doesn't have this hanging over his head for the rest of the school year," said Rene Heinrich, the victim's attorney.

    The judge also ordered a sexual offender assessment to be done by the Kenton County Probation Department.

    Dinkel's attorneys had presented their own assessment.

    to bad for her,she should have known better them that,15 to young...
    but we know he loved every bit of it....look now he will be rich

    Comment


    • #3
      If a woman taps a 15 year old, it's no big deal and the punishments are light. If a guy taps a 15yr old, it's huge and the punishments are most severe. If justice were indeed blind, the sex of the offender who mean nothing and every person that violates a child would be sentenced to the highest degree with no exceptions.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Kapaibro
        "She just wanted to make sure that the bulk of this criminal thing could be done and over with before the school year starts so her son doesn't have this hanging over his head for the rest of the school year," said Rene Heinrich, the victim's attorney.


        yeah we all know that her son will forget that she had sex with one of his friends

        i find it funny that the kid she had sex with is now a victim. of what im sure he feels he was vicitmized in this situation

        the law enforcement is now going after ex-bengals wives
        sigpic

        sig by B4B6..

        Comment


        • #5
          So it is either genentics or any close affiliation with the bengals... you have it coming

          Comment


          • #6
            She had sex with her sons friend.

            His parents obviously felt that these people were responsible and trusted them with their child. She betrayed that trust.

            Regardless of whether or not he initiated the sex is besides the point. Not only was he too young to have sex with, she was in a position of responsibility. No different from a teacher sleeping with a student, regardless of gender.
            President of the GPA, Head of Mainland Europe Chapter




            formerly Officially Adopted by saltybuggah
            I adopted Skywalker

            I have been adopted by Chris Wade

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Sniptilla
              If a woman taps a 15 year old, it's no big deal and the punishments are light. If a guy taps a 15yr old, it's huge and the punishments are most severe. If justice were indeed blind, the sex of the offender who mean nothing and every person that violates a child would be sentenced to the highest degree with no exceptions.

              That's because there is a double standard. There always has been and in this case I'm almost not opposed to it. Is it wrong? In the eyes of the Law, yes. Do you think this 15 yr old boy is going to be traumatized by the experience? Not in the least. Much like the boy who was having sex with his young, very attractive teacher.

              I'm still of the opinion, call me tasteless, a dinosaur, old fashioned, insensitive, whatever, that a man (in this case a teenage boy) can't really be "raped" by a woman. I understand statutory rape laws and the reasons for them, but especially in this case, there was no "forcible" assault. At 15, he knew what he was doing. I was "bumping uglies" at 15 (granted, it was with teenage girls) and so are most high schoolers and have been since the 60's. I find it really difficult (and I'm a father with a son of my own) to believe that they should put this woman away for rape. Personally, (and yes I do have a HUGE double standard) I would be much more upset if it was my juvenile daughter with an over-aged man than my juvenile son with a woman.

              Sex is completely different both physically and psychologically for men and women. IMO, the statutes should be different accordingly.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by HORSEPOWER 56
                That's because there is a double standard. There always has been and in this case I'm almost not opposed to it. Is it wrong? In the eyes of the Law, yes. Do you think this 15 yr old boy is going to be traumatized by the experience? Not in the least. Much like the boy who was having sex with his young, very attractive teacher.

                I'm still of the opinion, call me tasteless, a dinosaur, old fashioned, insensitive, whatever, that a man (in this case a teenage boy) can't really be "raped" by a woman. I understand statutory rape laws and the reasons for them, but especially in this case, there was no "forcible" assault. At 15, he knew what he was doing. I was "bumping uglies" at 15 (granted, it was with teenage girls) and so are most high schoolers and have been since the 60's. I find it really difficult (and I'm a father with a son of my own) to believe that they should put this woman away for rape. Personally, (and yes I do have a HUGE double standard) I would be much more upset if it was my juvenile daughter with an over-aged man than my juvenile son with a woman.

                Sex is completely different both physically and psychologically for men and women. IMO, the statutes should be different accordingly.
                I completely agree with you here. IF she had tied him down and forced something into his anus without his consent, THEN it would have been rape. That 15 yr old boy most probably wasn't a virgin, and he was just as consenting as she was.

                Double standard? Perhaps. But that boy isn't going ot be traumatized by the sexual act at all. He's traumatized by his parents taking him to court and having to testify against the woman he had fun with... and his friend's mom.

                Should she just be let go? No. Should she have done it...no. But I believe, as HorsePower 56 stated so well... the status should be treated differently.
                Last edited by Ravage!!!; 07-18-2007, 09:17 AM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kapaibro
                  She had sex with her sons friend.

                  His parents obviously felt that these people were responsible and trusted them with their child. She betrayed that trust.

                  Regardless of whether or not he initiated the sex is besides the point. Not only was he too young to have sex with, she was in a position of responsibility. No different from a teacher sleeping with a student, regardless of gender.
                  she was in a position but not one of responsibility
                  sigpic

                  sig by B4B6..

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    im sure the "rape victim" enjoyed it...


                    sigpic

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kapaibro
                      7/17/2007 4:04:49 PM

                      The wife of former Cincinnati Bengal lineman Tom Dinkel will be sentenced in August on third-degree rape charges.

                      Jeni Dinkel, 51, has admitted to sexual activity with her son's 15-year-old friend during a wild party at the family home.

                      Dinkel works as a Hollywood makeup artist when she's not at her home south of Cincinnati.

                      Judge Gregory Bartlett said earlier this month that he thought the case was "too far off the norm" to accept a plea deal.

                      He expressed concern over the fact that Dinkel continued to say the 15-year-old victim initiated the sexual contact.

                      After hearing from the judge that she'd be sentenced sooner than she expected, Jeni Lee Dinkel left the courtroom in tears.

                      It's a clear victory for the 15-year old victim's family who just wants the legal proceedings to get over quickly.

                      "She just wanted to make sure that the bulk of this criminal thing could be done and over with before the school year starts so her son doesn't have this hanging over his head for the rest of the school year," said Rene Heinrich, the victim's attorney.

                      The judge also ordered a sexual offender assessment to be done by the Kenton County Probation Department.

                      Dinkel's attorneys had presented their own assessment.

                      I feel sorry for the son of the wife. He will never here the end of the yo momma jokes for that one.
                      From a teenagers perspective. The "victim" is lucky

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by anton...
                        im sure the "rape victim" enjoyed it...

                        Women are perfectly capable of raping someone.

                        Rape is rape and the victim was a child.

                        If an 18 year old has sex with a 15 year old it is illegal and the 18 year old will be charged w/ child molestation.

                        A 51 year old has sex with a 15 year old - definitely child molestation.

                        It doesn't matter if it is a man that committed the crime or a woman - it is still child molestation.
                        The Browns are gone; I'm not a fan of the Impostors

                        The real Browns are in Baltimore, see?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Charlie Brown
                          Women are perfectly capable of raping someone.

                          Rape is rape and the victim was a child.

                          If an 18 year old has sex with a 15 year old it is illegal and the 18 year old will be charged w/ child molestation.

                          A 51 year old has sex with a 15 year old - definitely child molestation.

                          It doesn't matter if it is a man that committed the crime or a woman - it is still child molestation.
                          Finally, someone who doesn't think this is funny.

                          I refuse to believe that any parent here would be happy to find out that one of their friends/accquaintances had sex with their child.

                          People can laugh it up all they want about how he 'enjoyed' it, but the fact remains that this woman broke the law. Even if you think it's a dumb law, it's still the law.

                          And as for the whole 'boy vs girl maturity', argument, girls are actually the more emotionally/psychologically mature at the age of 15 than boys.
                          President of the GPA, Head of Mainland Europe Chapter




                          formerly Officially Adopted by saltybuggah
                          I adopted Skywalker

                          I have been adopted by Chris Wade

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Kapaibro
                            7/17/2007 4:04:49 PM

                            The wife of former Cincinnati Bengal lineman Tom Dinkel will be sentenced in August on third-degree rape charges.

                            Jeni Dinkel, 51, has admitted to sexual activity with her son's 15-year-old friend during a wild party at the family home.

                            Dinkel works as a Hollywood makeup artist when she's not at her home south of Cincinnati.

                            Judge Gregory Bartlett said earlier this month that he thought the case was "too far off the norm" to accept a plea deal.

                            He expressed concern over the fact that Dinkel continued to say the 15-year-old victim initiated the sexual contact.

                            After hearing from the judge that she'd be sentenced sooner than she expected, Jeni Lee Dinkel left the courtroom in tears.

                            It's a clear victory for the 15-year old victim's family who just wants the legal proceedings to get over quickly.

                            "She just wanted to make sure that the bulk of this criminal thing could be done and over with before the school year starts so her son doesn't have this hanging over his head for the rest of the school year," said Rene Heinrich, the victim's attorney.

                            The judge also ordered a sexual offender assessment to be done by the Kenton County Probation Department.

                            Dinkel's attorneys had presented their own assessment.
                            I call BS. I bet that kid enjoyed every moment of it and then boasted to all his friends afterwards. Now he'll be rich too.
                            The new website is about as ugly as Paris Hilton. Put the blue back!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Kapaibro
                              Finally, someone who doesn't think this is funny.

                              I refuse to believe that any parent here would be happy to find out that one of their friends/accquaintances had sex with their child.

                              People can laugh it up all they want about how he 'enjoyed' it, but the fact remains that this woman broke the law. Even if you think it's a dumb law, it's still the law.

                              And as for the whole 'boy vs girl maturity', argument, girls are actually the more emotionally/psychologically mature at the age of 15 than boys.
                              I find it disgusting that people laugh and joke that he "enjoyed" it. Rape is rape. Period. There is no "pleasure" in rape for the victim. This woman has taken advantage of a child for her own sexual gratification.
                              The Browns are gone; I'm not a fan of the Impostors

                              The real Browns are in Baltimore, see?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X