Page 4 of 67 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 14 54 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 998
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    16,703
    I think Jordy Nelson is your play here. at least that is what I would do. JN seems to be getting targets. Green bay spreads that ball around and they are up against a week secondary in the panthers this week.

    Matthews has really shown nothing to suggest starting him. Plus Tolbert snakes all the goalline work.

    Ocho was a ghost last week (but you never know with NE)

    and rookie wrs well

    Julio Jones did well but he is facing that eagles secondary this week.
    AJ green I dont think is a solid play at all. his touchdown was more the defense falling asleep rather then a good play.

    thats my

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,311
    Mendenhall vs Hightower is a tough call for me. Think Hightower, Tim against his former team should have a little extra juice going. Mendenhall may take a back seat to the Big Ben redeption show, and get pulled early in a blowout.

    Seattle and AZ both have pretty good run defenses imo.
    Hmmm?
    Ravens GM 2016 - Ravens are looking to trade down 4-8 spots

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    3,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Remedy View Post
    I think Jordy Nelson is your play here. at least that is what I would do. JN seems to be getting targets. Green bay spreads that ball around and they are up against a week secondary in the panthers this week.

    Matthews has really shown nothing to suggest starting him. Plus Tolbert snakes all the goalline work.

    Ocho was a ghost last week (but you never know with NE)

    and rookie wrs well

    Julio Jones did well but he is facing that eagles secondary this week.
    AJ green I dont think is a solid play at all. his touchdown was more the defense falling asleep rather then a good play.

    thats my
    Yep this is exactly how I had my team laid out so It's good to have people in agreement . I wish RM would quit being so unreliable though, but with Tolbert; hes the powerback and was getting the screens as well last week so I'm gonna try to deal RM to someone w/out a solid RB for a stellar TE or something. Thanks again m8, cps


    Adopted by: Andrewmlb
    Sig by: MHS

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    16,703
    Quote Originally Posted by MHSalute View Post
    Mendenhall vs Hightower is a tough call for me. Think Hightower, Tim against his former team should have a little extra juice going. Mendenhall may take a back seat to the Big Ben redeption show, and get pulled early in a blowout.

    Seattle and AZ both have pretty good run defenses imo.
    Hmmm?
    I figure the Steelers run up the score good on a bad seattle defense. I also think he will get the rock alot. Not sure I would bench Mendenhall here. I think he is a for sure start.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    3,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Remedy View Post
    I figure the Steelers run up the score good on a bad seattle defense. I also think he will get the rock alot. Not sure I would bench Mendenhall here. I think he is a for sure start.
    Hard not to play Hightower though with Rex Grossman at the helm. ESPECIALLY in a PPR league if it is one. I see zone blocking and screen passes to Hightower all day...jeez its hard to sit Mendenhall though lol; in this case I'd lean on Tim


    Adopted by: Andrewmlb
    Sig by: MHS

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,311
    Gut says Tim, but thanks guys. RM just does not have a history of going off in a blowout. Oak game last year a good example: 35-3 score and Mendenhall had 59 yards and a TD and was pulled in the 4th Qrt for Redman. Same against Panthers.

    Not a PPR, but Tim should see the EZ once I think.
    Ravens GM 2016 - Ravens are looking to trade down 4-8 spots

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Evergreen Colorado
    Posts
    3,669
    James Starks or Julio Jones in a PPR league?
    Coke Bottle Glasses and QB Killa' Fan Club! #24

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    6,311
    Quote Originally Posted by nic.zeman24 View Post
    James Starks or Julio Jones in a PPR league?
    Starks easy. Rookie WRs are bad juju. Word is Starks a much better pass blocker, so he should cartch a few this week.
    Ravens GM 2016 - Ravens are looking to trade down 4-8 spots

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    16,703
    Quote Originally Posted by MHSalute View Post
    Starks easy. Rookie WRs are bad juju. Word is Starks a much better pass blocker, so he should cartch a few this week.
    This is more or less in line with my thinking. I think starks is the better back in that back field crew plus he should grab a few.

    Nor do I have alot of confidence in any of the big rookie wrs.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    3,149
    Was gonna say starks also. He is going to be used a lot for blocking and then being that emergency dumpoff for positive yardage. Not to mention he'll run some and get some screen plays.


    Adopted by: Andrewmlb
    Sig by: MHS

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    9,729
    Brandon Lloyd, is he playing?

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    16,703
    NFLfantasy NFL Fantasy Football
    Looks like Lloyd is going to play today, according to the Denver Post

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,340
    Antonio Gates, or Rob Gronkowski?

    It should be a shootout, and both QB's have been targeting these guys. Which one do you think gets the nod this week?

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    30,076
    Quote Originally Posted by kishzilla View Post
    Antonio Gates, or Rob Gronkowski?

    It should be a shootout, and both QB's have been targeting these guys. Which one do you think gets the nod this week?
    i don't see how you could not start gates. would be a real gamble going with Gronkowski even though he had a good game last week.

    it was only one game though, gates is the much safer choice but then again i am biased.

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Up North
    Posts
    16,703
    Quote Originally Posted by baphamet View Post
    i don't see how you could not start gates. would be a real gamble going with Gronkowski even though he had a good game last week.

    it was only one game though, gates is the much safer choice but then again i am biased.
    This.

    I don't really know any circumstance where I would start someone over Gates at this point.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •