Page 11 of 12 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 170
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    hampshire,england
    Posts
    12,967
    BQ might want to move but if he's happy to stay then I think he is a good back-up.

    I don't think M Thomas has done that well this year. McBean has outperfomed him IMO

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    34,502
    No clue to be honest who we'll take, assuming Luck, Barkley, Jones, and RG3 go ahead of us, i'd guess....

    CB, DL, WR are our top pick.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    hampshire,england
    Posts
    12,967
    Quote Originally Posted by ERoyal248 View Post
    No clue to be honest who we'll take, assuming Luck, Barkley, Jones, and RG3 go ahead of us, i'd guess....

    CB, DL, WR are our top pick.
    There's alot of good talent where we pick IMO and in the positions we might look at.

    Elway has said (when he took over) he wants as many picks for the next 3-4 drafts as possible.

    The ONLY trade up would be for one of the top 4 QB's if they fell to around 10 - 12, it wouldn't surprise me if we moved for one of them

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Broncos Country
    Posts
    10,375
    I want us to get a CB or WR in the first, and I want Chris Polk from Washington in the second. Polk's a tough runner. Reminds me of a faster, and less troublesome Marshawn Lynch.

    I would like Stephon Gillmore in the first. He's the best tackling corner I have ever seen, and I watch Champ Bailey's tackling as well. His awareness is amazing, and he is pretty good in zone and man coverage. He doesn't have the greatest speed, but he's not extremely slow either.

    2014 Pick'Em Challenge Champion
    Proud Fan of the 3 Time Super Bowl Champion Denver Broncos

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    hampshire,england
    Posts
    12,967
    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoFanBoy View Post
    I want us to get a CB or WR in the first, and I want Chris Polk from Washington in the second. Polk's a tough runner. Reminds me of a faster, and less troublesome Marshawn Lynch.

    I would like Stephon Gillmore in the first. He's the best tackling corner I have ever seen, and I watch Champ Bailey's tackling as well. His awareness is amazing, and he is pretty good in zone and man coverage. He doesn't have the greatest speed, but he's not extremely slow either.
    I don't know much about Gilmore. I shouldn't have included Minnifield, he has struggles lately and is a round 2/3 pick.

    Jenkins has issues with would worry me.

    I don't know much about Hosley ? Is he any good ?

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    hampshire,england
    Posts
    12,967
    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoFanBoy View Post
    I want us to get a CB or WR in the first, and I want Chris Polk from Washington in the second. Polk's a tough runner. Reminds me of a faster, and less troublesome Marshawn Lynch.

    I would like Stephon Gillmore in the first. He's the best tackling corner I have ever seen, and I watch Champ Bailey's tackling as well. His awareness is amazing, and he is pretty good in zone and man coverage. He doesn't have the greatest speed, but he's not extremely slow either.
    Not too bothered about a WR with the offense we run.

    DT and Decker are starters and we have Royal (if he stays) and Willis. I'm hoping Julius Thomas has an impact next season

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    West Coast, Denmark
    Posts
    8,530
    lol we let Prater go? No way.
    Adopted Poster
    AZ Snake Fan

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Broncos Country
    Posts
    10,375
    Quote Originally Posted by bronx_2003 View Post
    Not too bothered about a WR with the offense we run.

    DT and Decker are starters and we have Royal (if he stays) and Willis. I'm hoping Julius Thomas has an impact next season
    DT's good when he's not injured, but he always is. Royal hasn't really impressed me too much this season as a WR. I like Willis, but I don't think he's ready to be a #2 if Royal leaves and Thomas gets hurt.

    We don't pass the ball a lot, but when we do, I want that part of the offense to be good too, so opposing defenses will have troubles against that. As for Hosley, I honestly haven't seen him play much, but I saw a scouting report on him. He's a ball hawk with great reflexes, but can be beat by larger receivers and he sucks at tackling. I'd say he's a poor man's Asante Samuel.

    2014 Pick'Em Challenge Champion
    Proud Fan of the 3 Time Super Bowl Champion Denver Broncos

  9. #159
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,406
    I hate the thought of drafting a LB round one or even round two and three. Just seems so unnecessary. I do think regardless of how well the defense is playing the secondary is still top priority.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    442
    I haven't seen any of them, but usually WRs are a bad idea in the first round. There are a few freak of nature type players, but I remember seeing a breakdown of how the chances of getting just a generic player or a bust are really high for that position.

    http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com...Draft_Day.html

    I see the broncos' needs in that areas as moderate at best. Are the people suggesting a WR saying that out of need or because they think there are going to be exceptional ones still available?

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    268
    Personally, I'd like to see Bunkley, Mays, Prater, Colquitt, Woodyard, McBean, Willis, Rosario, and Thomas back. Most of them would come relatively cheap, too. Bunk, Prater, and Colquitt will all likely be the most expensive out of the bunch, but all 3 should be affordable.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    400
    Larsen is definitely a keeper IMO.

    Still undecided on Royal but I think he stays.
    [URL]www.nrlhub.com[/URL] NRL HUB

  13. #163
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    7,618
    Get off the friggin DT train guys, you're just setting yourself up for senseless outrage, see last offseason.

    It's not a need. Denver has 4 under contract for next year and they're likely to try to extend their best guy, a free agent.

  14. #164
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oakland,CA
    Posts
    11,348
    Quote Originally Posted by samparnell View Post
    The Broncos probably think they have enough information on Minnesota in the current gameplan to deal with the Vikings on Sunday.

    Acquiring McNabb would have a price tag and would require releasing a player. Logically that would be Quinn, but practically that would be unwise.

    The rest of the roster is currently well balanced and full of young players who are part of what is happening on the team right now. There are questions about McNabb's conditioning and ability to run Denver's offense.

    Future QBs added to the roster may be much more Tebowesque than Donovan McNabb.

    He will be claimed by another team. I like Rodd's theory.
    I guess nobody claimed McNabb,the 1.5 million contract was to much considering what he is worth,the veteran minimum.

  15. #165
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    FORT COLLINS COLORADO
    Posts
    8,562
    Quote Originally Posted by SoundsOfSuccess View Post
    Get off the friggin DT train guys, you're just setting yourself up for senseless outrage, see last offseason.

    It's not a need. Denver has 4 under contract for next year and they're likely to try to extend their best guy, a free agent.
    face or not, it is the one position that we could add that would make this defense from Really good to Elite. if we could get a DT who gets a bit better penetraition and will prevent the QB from stepping up it would allow us to get hace 2 double digit sackers Doom and Miller. along with some one to prevent them from stepping up which would add 5-7 sacks and could make a very dangerous Trio

    oakland raders gm
    latavis murray trade bait

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •