This question was brought up yesterday on Bill Williamson's weekly chat on espn.com. He wrote how he thought Poe was the better prospect.
I don't get why Poe is considered the better prospect. This is the problem that I have with the combine. Guys like Poe who disappeared in conference USA games are viewed as better prospects than someone who dominated in a tougher conference.
I think when you look at the two players talk you can tell who wants it more. You can have all the measurables in the world but that doesn't mean anything when the game is played. Poe gives up on plays, Wolfe has a constant motor.
What do you all think. Would you trade Wolfe for Poe?
I don't get why Poe is considered the better prospect. This is the problem that I have with the combine. Guys like Poe who disappeared in conference USA games are viewed as better prospects than someone who dominated in a tougher conference.
I think when you look at the two players talk you can tell who wants it more. You can have all the measurables in the world but that doesn't mean anything when the game is played. Poe gives up on plays, Wolfe has a constant motor.
What do you all think. Would you trade Wolfe for Poe?
Comment