
Originally Posted by
Awesomo 2000
Something I've noticed, from casual observance of several teams over the years, is that when a quarterback starts being referred to as "best chance to win", he's not actually the best chance to win. I'm not saying that it means anything concrete, but if our FO or coaches start calling him that, it's a pretty big red flag.
But its just true. Every starting QB is talked about the same way. They are starting, because of the available players, these are the best they have at that position that give you that chance.
But on a proactive note: Since Manning will probably come back, protecting his health is going to be priority #1. That's going to have to come from the coaches, and not from Manning phantom sacking himself out there to save his body. The Oz will probably have to play a full game or more, and at the very least be ready for some spot duty.
But of course. That is what a QB2 does. Or at least, should.
So, whether Manning is coming back or not, Oz has to be ready to jump in and win some games too. If we ride out Manning all the way to the end of the season, I doubt he'll have anything left to give, no matter how bad he wants to.
I don't have much faith in Brock, but he should get his shot one way or the other next year. I think that the teams fate will rest with him, even if Manning's back. If he can play 3 or more games competently, and give Manning rest in spot duty, we might have a chance. Otherwise, I think we're hosed.
Why? There really is no solid evidence that Manning cant play, if healthy. None.
Without getting into some 2 page wall of text, I think that's basically what it boils down to, and it's about as optimistic as I can get, considering our current situation.