Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: NFL HGH Probe

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    13,208

    NFL HGH Probe

    The NFL issued the results from its investigation of the remaining players named in the Al-Jazeera HGH story which also named Peyton Manning (since cleared).

    All the players denied the accusations

    Ian Rapoport ‏@RapSheet 1h1 hour ago
    Here is the full release from the @NFL on clearing the players in the HGH Al-Jazeera America situation

    One player not mentioned in the release is Mike Neal. It's assumed his investigation is still on going.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Rastic View Post
    The NFL issued the results from its investigation of the remaining players named in the Al-Jazeera HGH story which also named Peyton Manning (since cleared).

    All the players denied the accusations



    One player not mentioned in the release is Mike Neal. It's assumed his investigation is still on going.
    Just the NFL embarrassing itself again...."comprehensive investigation", that's a good one. There was no investigation, just a meeting with the players who all denied it, so no evidence found. NFL decides who it wants to bust, clearly they had no interest in a huge scandal involving many great players. If they did they would have hired Wells like they did in bountygate and deflategate. Goodell has no integrity.....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    243

    2016 NFL TV Distribution Maps - Week 6

    Hi, Broncos fans! Our Broncos already played Thursday Night, so here's the menu for this Sunday.

    KCNC CBS Channel 4: Chiefs @ Raiders

    KDVR FOX Channel 31: Redskins @ Eagles, and Cowboys @ Packers

    http://506sports.com/

    http://www.506sports.com/

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Derby, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    26,880
    Quote Originally Posted by CaribouRanch View Post
    Hi, Broncos fans! Our Broncos will play Thursday Night, so here's the menu for this Sunday.

    KCNC CBS Channel 4: Chiefs @ Raiders

    KDVR FOX Channel 31: Redskins @ Eagles, and Cowboys @ Packers

    http://506sports.com/

    http://www.506sports.com/

    Game hasn't happened yet since it's Wednesday


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Loveland
    Posts
    8,328
    Quote Originally Posted by Freyaka View Post
    Game hasn't happened yet since it's Wednesday
    Oh man! I was what?? Is this guy from the future??

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    165

    Atlanta is really good!

    I watched the Seahawks game today and Seattle was lucky to get a win today. That was in Seattle where it is hard for visitors to win. Matt Ryan and Julio Jones are really hard to stop. The Atlanta defense is pretty good too. Bronco fans shouldn't feel real bad about losing that game. Siemian and the Broncos are still learning to play together and I suspect Trevor wasn't 100% in the SD game.
    Last edited by Seattle_Cat; 10-16-2016 at 06:25 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by Seattle_Cat View Post
    I watched the Seahawks game today and Seattle was lucky to get a win today. That was in Seattle where it is hard for visitors to win. Matt Ryan and Julio Jones are really hard to stop. The Atlanta defense is pretty good too. Bronco fans shouldn't feel real bad about losing that game. Siemian and the Broncos are still learning to play together and I suspect Trevor wasn't 100% in the SD game.
    They were basically afraid to throw at Talib and CHJ (and both dropped INTs that could've changed the outcome but no way you can criticize those guys.. just bad luck).. They weren't at all afraid of Richard Sherman.. if not for the missed DPI call on him at the end, ATL has a FG attempt to win that game

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cebu, Philippines
    Posts
    649

    Nantz comment on Brock move

    I think it was 1st Qtr and Nantz said he'd asked Brock about the move and Brock said he loved Denver (and the staff, team, fans, etc.) but he felt the opportunity in Houston was better and it wasn't about the money. Does that make any sense really? What better opportunity could there be in Houston? With Denver you have a big game winning defense strong enough make it easy on the offense. Maybe he thought Elway would bring in a new starting QB and he'd go to the bench again but I don't know how he could think that with the offered salary. Maybe he wanted to go to a team with a great offense that could then win by scoring a lot of points instead of relying on the defense but that doesn't really describe Houston. I really have tried to come up with a logical explanation of his statement but I think he should just say he went for the money and not try to sell some angle that doesn't wash but maybe lets him sleep better at night.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,961
    Quote Originally Posted by SkyFlash1 View Post
    I think it was 1st Qtr and Nantz said he'd asked Brock about the move and Brock said he loved Denver (and the staff, team, fans, etc.) but he felt the opportunity in Houston was better and it wasn't about the money. Does that make any sense really? What better opportunity could there be in Houston? With Denver you have a big game winning defense strong enough make it easy on the offense. Maybe he thought Elway would bring in a new starting QB and he'd go to the bench again but I don't know how he could think that with the offered salary. Maybe he wanted to go to a team with a great offense that could then win by scoring a lot of points instead of relying on the defense but that doesn't really describe Houston. I really have tried to come up with a logical explanation of his statement but I think he should just say he went for the money and not try to sell some angle that doesn't wash but maybe lets him sleep better at night.
    hes just trying to say the right thing like everyone else...he went after the money.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,913
    Brock in Denver: Just a guy. Brock in Houston: Potential franchise savior. So far it's not working out that way.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Oh Yea...Right there!
    Posts
    7,315
    Brock was making somewhere around $1-M per year more or less. There was no call from the Broncos and he got $36-M guaranteed. Who wouldn't make that move? It worked out great for both sides and it seems to be working out terribly for the Texans.
    https://media.giphy.com/media/cAgxSFqbyaQgeyY3VA/giphy.gif

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    DC
    Posts
    9,629
    It's about the money. Period.
    Maybe a little spite too.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Sydney,Australia
    Posts
    1,425

    Are KC that good???

    Just looked at nmy local betting markets for SB LI and noticed that KC are 3rd favorites behind Cowboys and Patriots who are top seed.We are sixth.Do KC deserve to be that low???

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,279
    Quote Originally Posted by AussieBronco76 View Post
    Just looked at nmy local betting markets for SB LI and noticed that KC are 3rd favorites behind Cowboys and Patriots who are top seed.We are sixth.Do KC deserve to be that low???
    We match up well against them. Chargers are a bad one for us because their Tight ends in gates and henry with their running backs that receive well pose more of a problem. Chiefs arent stellar any where.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    5,026
    Quote Originally Posted by SaltySnipes View Post
    We match up well against them. Chargers are a bad one for us because their Tight ends in gates and henry with their running backs that receive well pose more of a problem. Chiefs arent stellar any where.
    Chiefs have the better tight end and the better rushing attack over San Diego. I actually think the Chiefs are one of our worst matchups in the entire NFL.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •