Page 148 of 235 FirstFirst ... 48 98 138 146 147 148 149 150 158 198 ... LastLast
Results 2,206 to 2,220 of 3524

Thread: Flacco

  1. #2206
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by DENVERSB50CHAMP View Post
    Hopefully Joe Flacco retires after this Season.....

    After the restructure there is a 0.0 chance of that happening

  2. #2207
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco51 View Post
    Where were they getting that QB last offseason?
    We've had how many years to address the position? It's certainly been more than one.

  3. #2208
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    The whole team sucks. Flacco is a below average QB on a bad team. Pretty simple.

  4. #2209
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    1,142
    No QB will ever play great here until we address the offensive line.

  5. #2210
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by DavisMVP View Post
    No QB will ever play great here until we address the offensive line.
    The offensive line will never be great until we bring in a legit qb. Noone respects Flacco ability to beat the blitz our line was under siege all game just like they've been all year

  6. #2211
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,388
    This team is way more than just a QB away.

  7. #2212
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,332
    Quote Originally Posted by BeelzeBob View Post
    We've had how many years to address the position? It's certainly been more than one.
    We can play revisionist history all we want. Flacco was the guy they chose last offseason. Donít know who they could have realistically acquired. We could say the same about addressing the O-line.

  8. #2213
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Eastern Seaboard
    Posts
    3,381
    This is not madden, so if you keep changing coaches, Qb's, game plans etc. It takes time for things to work.
    A new 3 to 5 year plan every time you make major changes.

  9. #2214
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco51 View Post
    We can play revisionist history all we want. Flacco was the guy they chose last offseason. Donít know who they could have realistically acquired. We could say the same about addressing the O-line.
    Daniel Jones, Gardner Minshew or Jarrett Stidham would have been fine acquisitions compared to Flacco. If not for Lockís injury, I would give the Broncos better odds to win with him.

  10. #2215
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    DENVER
    Posts
    7,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Capt. Jack View Post
    This is not madden, so if you keep changing coaches, Qb's, game plans etc. It takes time for things to work.
    A new 3 to 5 year plan every time you make major changes.
    If that's your plan then you play the kid asap. Flacco will be going away sooner rather than later no matter what. We knew that when we acquired him. He is a poor QB with injury issues, it would not be long before one of the two sees him benched. Our chance at longevity and consistency at QB is Lock. Not a sure thing, but much better chances than Flacco.

  11. #2216
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Eastern Seaboard
    Posts
    3,381
    Quote Originally Posted by Papa-pwn View Post
    If that's your plan then you play the kid asap. Flacco will be going away sooner rather than later no matter what. We knew that when we acquired him. He is a poor QB with injury issues, it would not be long before one of the two sees him benched. Our chance at longevity and consistency at QB is Lock. Not a sure thing, but much better chances than Flacco.
    If they can't protect him, he gets squirrelly.
    And if continues to get sacked all the time, he will get hurt anyway.
    No sense starting any other QB just yet, because anyone back there is going to get pillaged.

  12. #2217
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    Daniel Jones, Gardner Minshew or Jarrett Stidham would have been fine acquisitions compared to Flacco. If not for Lockís injury, I would give the Broncos better odds to win with him.
    But they drafted a QB. And for some reason, they never draft a QB and make him Ďthe maní right away. So, what veteran were they going to get? Flacco isnít great, but most here would have burned Dove Valley to the ground if Keenum was kept as the starter.

  13. #2218
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    3,416
    Quote Originally Posted by BeelzeBob View Post
    The people who were saying Flacco wasn't a problem were living in a dream world. We'd probably be 3-0 with a proper franchise QB. Instead we're 0-3 with a backup quality QB who has thrown two TDs in three games. It's a huge problem.
    Yea. 3-0 teams win those games with no sacks, turnovers or Pass rush. Itís obviously all on the QB.

  14. #2219
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    DENVER
    Posts
    7,500
    Quote Originally Posted by Bates View Post
    Yea. 3-0 teams win those games with no sacks, turnovers or Pass rush. Itís obviously all on the QB.
    Our defense altogether is average, our QB is bottom 10 in the league at his job. Both own shares of the blame.

  15. #2220
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,804
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco51 View Post
    But they drafted a QB. And for some reason, they never draft a QB and make him Ďthe maní right away. So, what veteran were they going to get? Flacco isnít great, but most here would have burned Dove Valley to the ground if Keenum was kept as the starter.
    Not having a good selection of veterans isnít a good reason to sign an average/less than average veteran. Draft your guy and deal with the ups and downs with a young quarterback. It wouldnít be any worse than what we have now.
    Last edited by Fantaztic7; 09-22-2019 at 06:20 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •