Page 202 of 234 FirstFirst ... 102 152 192 200 201 202 203 204 212 ... LastLast
Results 3,016 to 3,030 of 3504

Thread: Flacco

  1. #3016
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    13,298
    Quote Originally Posted by BeelzeBob View Post
    They don’t have to learn blocking schemes like OL or route combinations like WRs, at least not to be effective. The reason you don’t see lots of 600+ receiving yards from rookie TEs is because a TE, rookie or veteran, rarely produces 600+ yard seasons unless they are featured receivers in an offense (which rookie TEs almost never are). I agree that the blocking side can be tough to learn, but TEs with the physical tools Fant has normally produce in the receiving game quickly because they are a huge matchup issue.
    Go back and look at Shannon Sharpe's, Tony Gonzalez, or Antonio Gates' rookie seasons. There is nothing to say Fant will ever sniff the air those TEs breathe, but even good and great TEs take time to grow.
    Last edited by Rastic; 10-14-2019 at 09:15 AM.

  2. #3017
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,980
    Quote Originally Posted by JW7 View Post
    Unlike the Titans, the Chiefs have a bad defense. I expect the Broncos to score 20+ points.
    20 probably isn't enough to beat the chiefs, and 20 wouldn't even be a good offensive game for most teams.

    Depressing considering we have people excited about the idea of maybe putting up 20 in a game

    Broncos have scored 20 points or more twice in the last 10 games.

  3. #3018
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by the0rangecrush View Post
    Last year 11 different TEs had 600+ yd seasons. There were multiple 1000+ yd TEs as well. Maybe, 2 of them were the feature of their offense. So no, it's not uncommon for veteran TEs to have 600+ receiving seasons. You're just flat out wrong on TEs just like you're wrong on a lot of your narratives.
    11 TEs across 32 teams had 600+ yard seasons, and youíre telling me its not uncommon and they arenít featured in their respective offenses? (Featured meaning that they are at least semi-regularly the first or second option in passing plays.)

    Anyway, this is off-topic and seems to just be a way for you to not actually defend your position on the OL and Flacco. You say Scangs is calling the offense around protection issues, but thereís just no proof of that. Every WCO has lots of quick passes, and every Shanny-tree offense has rollouts. Thatís just part of the offense. And we are still seeing slower developing plays here and there as is the norm for the offense. The issue is that Flacco is a bad QB with almost no mobility who is slow to make his progressions and who canít hit the tight windows required in the NFL because heís not accurate enough. Overall, our offense is not running more quick pass plays or more QB motion plays than is normal for the scheme. Flacco just sucks.

  4. #3019
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    california
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Starbroncs View Post
    20 probably isn't enough to beat the chiefs, and 20 wouldn't even be a good offensive game for most teams.

    Depressing considering we have people excited about the idea of maybe putting up 20 in a game

    Broncos have scored 20 points or more twice in the last 10 games.
    Well the colts beat chiefs in Arrowhead with 19pts. Key factor is can our OL dominate their DL and run it down their throats forcing Mahomes to sit on the sideline.

  5. #3020
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    320
    Quote Originally Posted by Rastic View Post
    Go back and look at Shannon Sharpe's, Tony Gonzalez, or Antonio Gates' rookie seasons. There is nothing to say Fant will ever sniff the air those TEs breathe, but even good and great TEs take time to grow.
    As rookies, Gonzalez didnít start a single game, and Gates started just 11. Both had nearly 400 yards receiving. Obviously they were not the primary or secondary options on most passing plays as TEs (thatís not how most offenses are designed), so their production as rookies who didnít start much, if at all, supports my position honestly.

    Shannon Sharpe, on the other hand, was a 7th round pick who barely saw the field as a rookie (and was drafted to play WR originally). He doesnít even apply to this discussion.

  6. #3021
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    california
    Posts
    2,036
    You guys are missing on 1 key fact. Every player is different , times and schemes are different as well. It's all a roll of the dice .

  7. #3022
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,443
    Quote Originally Posted by JW7 View Post
    Unlike the Titans, the Chiefs have a bad defense. I expect the Broncos to score 20+ points.
    I canít remember how many times over the last few seasons Iíve read the offense will score a lot against a bad defense. If it happens great but I wouldnít count on it.

  8. #3023
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    14,843
    Quote Originally Posted by BeelzeBob View Post
    11 TEs across 32 teams had 600+ yard seasons, and youíre telling me its not uncommon and they arenít featured in their respective offenses? (Featured meaning that they are at least semi-regularly the first or second option in passing plays.)

    Anyway, this is off-topic and seems to just be a way for you to not actually defend your position on the OL and Flacco. You say Scangs is calling the offense around protection issues, but thereís just no proof of that. Every WCO has lots of quick passes, and every Shanny-tree offense has rollouts. Thatís just part of the offense. And we are still seeing slower developing plays here and there as is the norm for the offense. The issue is that Flacco is a bad QB with almost no mobility who is slow to make his progressions and who canít hit the tight windows required in the NFL because heís not accurate enough. Overall, our offense is not running more quick pass plays or more QB motion plays than is normal for the scheme. Flacco just sucks.
    Quote Originally Posted by BeelzeBob View Post
    11 TEs across 32 teams had 600+ yard seasons, and youíre telling me its not uncommon and they arenít featured in their respective offenses? (Featured meaning that they are at least semi-regularly the first or second option in passing plays.)

    Anyway, this is off-topic and seems to just be a way for you to not actually defend your position on the OL and Flacco. You say Scangs is calling the offense around protection issues, but thereís just no proof of that. Every WCO has lots of quick passes, and every Shanny-tree offense has rollouts. Thatís just part of the offense. And we are still seeing slower developing plays here and there as is the norm for the offense. The issue is that Flacco is a bad QB with almost no mobility who is slow to make his progressions and who canít hit the tight windows required in the NFL because heís not accurate enough. Overall, our offense is not running more quick pass plays or more QB motion plays than is normal for the scheme. Flacco just sucks.
    It's not uncommon for veteran TEs about a third of the league does it. Admit you're wrong, take your L, and move on.

    As for protection, Flacco's YPA is tied for 24th in league, again quick developing routes is a big reason why. He is also tied for 6th in time to throw. He has to get the ball out fast. Yet on the same coin we are tied for 6th in sacks given up. Basically, we throw short and quick, and yet give up a lot of sacks. Why is that? Well, the OL can't sustain blocks on long developing routes. To put this into perspective to a similarly run offense in SF. Jimmy G is 7th in YPA, 4th in time to throw, but is 30th in sacks. So Flacco is just as quick to make throws, but they have to use shorter routes with a worse OL.

  9. #3024
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,582
    Quote Originally Posted by the0rangecrush View Post
    It's not uncommon for veteran TEs about a third of the league does it. Admit you're wrong, take your L, and move on.

    As for protection, Flacco's YPA is tied for 24th in league, again quick developing routes is a big reason why. He is also tied for 6th in time to throw. He has to get the ball out fast. Yet on the same coin we are tied for 6th in sacks given up. Basically, we throw short and quick, and yet give up a lot of sacks. Why is that? Well, the OL can't sustain blocks on long developing routes. To put this into perspective to a similarly run offense in SF. Jimmy G is 7th in YPA, 4th in time to throw, but is 30th in sacks. So Flacco is just as quick to make throws, but they have to use shorter routes with a worse OL.
    Flacco has always been a short-route thrower. He was under 7 yards per attempt prior to coming to Denver. He has a lesser career average than Brian Griese, who was Captain Check Down.

  10. #3025
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    14,843
    Quote Originally Posted by mojo0730 View Post
    Flacco has always been a short-route thrower. He was under 7 yards per attempt prior to coming to Denver. He has a lesser career average than Brian Griese, who was Captain Check Down.
    He's at 7.3 now, but what's glaring in difference between him and Jimmy G is the sack difference.

  11. #3026
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    32,701
    Flacco is what he is. There are at least (I included Brees with the least attempts of 48) 25 QBs ahead of him in passer rate. Be a good starter when you are waiting for your guy to either show up or return.

  12. #3027
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    10,582
    Quote Originally Posted by the0rangecrush View Post
    He's at 7.3 now, but what's glaring in difference between him and Jimmy G is the sack difference.
    I just think saying he's getting rid of the ball quicker due to the sacks which is leading to shorter throws isn't an accurate statement. The sacks are high, and it's difficult to tell what's on the o-line and what's on him, but he's always been a short-route thrower.

  13. #3028
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    DENVER
    Posts
    7,456
    Quote Originally Posted by mojo0730 View Post
    I just think saying he's getting rid of the ball quicker due to the sacks which is leading to shorter throws isn't an accurate statement. The sacks are high, and it's difficult to tell what's on the o-line and what's on him, but he's always been a short-route thrower.
    Right. When you look at his accuracy on passes beyond 5 yards, historically, it's not great. The last 5 years more so than the first half of his career. This year is more of the same, completing roughly 50% of his passes over 5 yards. That's in the bottom 10 of the league. Again though, like you said, it is hard to blame that on the OL or offense when that has been pretty par for the course from him since 2014.

  14. #3029
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    14,843
    Quote Originally Posted by Papa-pwn View Post
    Right. When you look at his accuracy on passes beyond 5 yards, historically, it's not great. The last 5 years more so than the first half of his career. This year is more of the same, completing roughly 50% of his passes over 5 yards. That's in the bottom 10 of the league. Again though, like you said, it is hard to blame that on the OL or offense when that has been pretty par for the course from him since 2014.
    Historically it was a different offense for Flacco. Apples and Oranges. I can say that while also giving up the 6th most sacks, we are also the 4th most penalized teams for holding. I would say there is a correlation between bad technique and the sacks given up.

  15. #3030
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Derby, Kansas, United States
    Posts
    27,049
    Quote Originally Posted by the0rangecrush View Post
    I think Lock definitely adds a different dimension. The boot action will definitely be more effective. Flacco's lack of mobility is killing that aspect. The DL or LB has no fear or need to commit to Flacco, so easy completions are slowly going away.
    Yeah, that was what made that boot so dangerous back in the Plummer days, you never knew if he was going to take off running.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •