View Poll Results: Would you play Drew Lock when healthy ?

Voters
59. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    34 57.63%
  • No

    25 42.37%
Page 8 of 10 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 139
  1. #106
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    I think Flacco will continue playing unless the team hits final four games at 2-10 or 4-8, which looks very possible at this point. Not sure how Lock will play however it’s better to get experience instead of wasting time with Flacco.
    I agree 100%

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Ear2dastreets View Post
    I know u was just replying. I was agreeing with you. My bad for the confusion.
    My bad. I didn't read it that way. Lol

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    I think Flacco will continue playing unless the team hits final four games at 2-10 or 4-8, which looks very possible at this point. Not sure how Lock will play however itís better to get experience instead of wasting time with Flacco.
    I agree as well. However this is the same FO and coaching staff that wasted almost all the reps with the 2's on Kevin Hogan, who didn't even make the final roster. Even if Lock has talent, I don't trust they will know how to properly develop him. Because of their inability to develop and hone a young QB, they will likely cling to Flacco for as long as they can.
    Superbowl 50 Champions!

  4. #109
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAsianPA View Post
    I agree as well. However this is the same FO and coaching staff that wasted almost all the reps with the 2's on Kevin Hogan, who didn't even make the final roster. Even if Lock has talent, I don't trust they will know how to properly develop him. Because of their inability to develop and hone a young QB, they will likely cling to Flacco for as long as they can.
    Spot on. I followed Hogan as far back as high school because he was a local prospect where we live. Hogan wasnít capable of getting the job done and proved so early in camp. Itís another example of an inexperienced head coach who made a poor decision. Even if Fangio and Scangarelo make the right decisions, itís likely Elway will meddle in the process.

  5. #110
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    california
    Posts
    1,953
    That 1st pre season game Hogan looked way better then Lock . However by game 2 that wasnt the case . Lock easily had #2 spot .

  6. #111
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Ear2dastreets View Post
    I agree 100%
    I found a quote that made me think of your desire to have a mobile QB:


  7. #112
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    1,835
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    I found a quote that made me think of your desire to have a mobile QB:

    Exactlyyyyyyt. Perfect words. We will never be successful with him here. This say in the pocket. Snaps from under the center is dying. That's why we can't score 20 points. We have no playmakers on offense. Secondary is old. We need a major rebuild.

  8. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    301
    Can someone explain again why Flacco's contract was restructured? I thought it was to bring in another upper tier player. Is Elway daring Ellis to fire him by making unexplainable decisions like this?

  9. #114
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by AZBobalu View Post
    Can someone explain again why Flacco's contract was restructured? I thought it was to bring in another upper tier player. Is Elway daring Ellis to fire him by making unexplainable decisions like this?
    This is what I want an answer to as well. The rumor was that they were trying to re-sign Simmons, but at this point he may not want to even re-sign. I was told by many posters here that it wasn't a big deal, that it was just a simple cap decision that had no ramifications, but uh, wow, it really does now. Flacco is truly going to be a dead cap suck over the next two years, three if we keep him longer. What a stupid decision that has had zero benefit.
    Superbowl 50 Champions!

  10. #115
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAsianPA View Post
    This is what I want an answer to as well. The rumor was that they were trying to re-sign Simmons, but at this point he may not want to even re-sign. I was told by many posters here that it wasn't a big deal, that it was just a simple cap decision that had no ramifications, but uh, wow, it really does now. Flacco is truly going to be a dead cap suck over the next two years, three if we keep him longer. What a stupid decision that has had zero benefit.
    Any of the handful of talented young players should want out of Denver. Elway rewards guys like Heuerman and pays big money to injury prone players. Then he turns around and plays hardball with guys who should earn more.

  11. #116
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    5,637
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    There are a handful of talented players. I know itís not popular to talk about trading Von however, the roster is well past the chance of winning by adding a player here or there. Elway restructured Vonís contract which put his cap number highest during years heís declining. Trade for the most value and create max cap space.

    Trade/release Flacco to free up cap space. Wolfe is done. I wouldnít sign Sanders to another contract. Itís different when youíre the Patriots signing Edelman to a 2 year deal because theyíre contending for a championship. Keep Callahan through 2020 and assess whether or not to release him (cap savings by releasing him before 2021). If he plays well in 2020 then heís worth keeping. Try to work a 2 year/3rd year option with CHJ. If not then part ways.

    Itís time to stop bringing in stop gap quarterbacks and get serious about building to compete in two to three years. The approach used over the past several years has failed. Itís not bashing the FO - itís reality.
    So we trade/cut Wolfe. Trade Von. Trade/Cut Flacco.

    The question is this - Flacco's contract is mid level to cheap by today's standards. So if he can play at or above average then why not keep him (at least for now). My other question or point is that we then have (and I am referring to actual talent):

    - Lindsay
    - Risner
    - Sutton
    - Patrick

    - Bausby (decent)
    - CHJ
    - Chubb
    - Reed
    - Gotsis (decent)
    - Hollins (decent)
    - Harris (looking more like top tier depth)

    So the biggest question is how is the team to be rebuilt? Speed? Size? Running? Passing?

    I also think that more importantly we need to decide what we want to be 'known' for. I think that if we do trade away Flacco we need to move in Lock to asses his ability. If he shows flashes then IMO we need to focus on top shelf OL players and do what we can to acquire top CBs to assist with pass rush.

  12. #117
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    14,818
    This is tough. Now that the season seems all but lost, I want to know if we have something in Drew Lock, and I think the only way to do that is to throw him into the fire and see how he responds. What's unfortunate is that while Flacco has been far from great, he also has led us on what should have been two game winning drives already this season. It is not Flacco's fault we are 0-4. I think our QB play is miles ahead of where we have been the past few seasons. I just can't understand how we actually are 0-4. I can't point to one thing in particular. It's extremely frustrating as a fan, and I actually do feel a bit bad for Joe, but I vote yes - let's just see what Lock can give us.
    Administrator


  13. #118
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    9,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Fantaztic7 View Post
    Any of the handful of talented young players should want out of Denver. Elway rewards guys like Heuerman and pays big money to injury prone players. Then he turns around and plays hardball with guys who should earn more.
    Talib really had it right when he said Elway needed to stop firing all the dogs. We have no dogs left on this team.
    Superbowl 50 Champions!

  14. #119
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    The 5280
    Posts
    13,225
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAsianPA View Post
    This is what I want an answer to as well. The rumor was that they were trying to re-sign Simmons, but at this point he may not want to even re-sign. I was told by many posters here that it wasn't a big deal, that it was just a simple cap decision that had no ramifications, but uh, wow, it really does now. Flacco is truly going to be a dead cap suck over the next two years, three if we keep him longer. What a stupid decision that has had zero benefit.
    Maybe Elways logic is that for all the dumb decisions he makes, Eliss will force him to suffer through them all!

    Seriously I keep telling ppl that Elway wonít be fired however a winless season with no repercussions looks very bad on a Elissís resume as well so perhaps heíll grow a pair and dismiss the responsible parties.
    Last edited by Sam_Z; 09-29-2019 at 08:12 PM.

  15. #120
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich_C View Post
    So we trade/cut Wolfe. Trade Von. Trade/Cut Flacco.

    The question is this - Flacco's contract is mid level to cheap by today's standards. So if he can play at or above average then why not keep him (at least for now). My other question or point is that we then have (and I am referring to actual talent):

    - Lindsay
    - Risner
    - Sutton
    - Patrick

    - Bausby (decent)
    - CHJ
    - Chubb
    - Reed
    - Gotsis (decent)
    - Hollins (decent)
    - Harris (looking more like top tier depth)

    So the biggest question is how is the team to be rebuilt? Speed? Size? Running? Passing?

    I also think that more importantly we need to decide what we want to be 'known' for. I think that if we do trade away Flacco we need to move in Lock to asses his ability. If he shows flashes then IMO we need to focus on top shelf OL players and do what we can to acquire top CBs to assist with pass rush.
    Trading/moving on from Flacco provides $27.5 million cap savings over 2020-21. Trading Von provides just under $32 million cap savings over 2020-21. Those two moves alone create nearly $60 million in cap over the next two years. There is no way to justify burning $60 million in cap on two players when your team cannot generate a win.

    With the expected cap plus more from moving on from guys like Flacco and Von, sign the few talented players on the roster and bring in young talented free agents. Build around a young QB like Lock and maybe take a shot at drafting another.

    Guys like Wolfe can walk as an UFA - no way should he get another contract.

    Iím not even convinced CHJ should be in Denver after 2019. He makes some plays but he is bad for team moral IMO. He constantly blames others, even when heís been burned.

    This roster needs to be reworked from top to bottom. Von still has a few plays left in him but he canít makeup for 52 other guys. Why tie up $73 million in cap by keeping him the next three years? The Broncos arenít close enough with him on the roster.

    Lock needs to start as soon as soon as the ligament in his hand is fully healed. Start the evaluation to see if he has the potential. Wasting time continuing with Flacco.
    Last edited by Fantaztic7; 09-29-2019 at 08:25 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •