Isnt drafting and signing FA rebuilding in a sense . It's a constant building up of a team.
Yes
No
Isnt drafting and signing FA rebuilding in a sense . It's a constant building up of a team.
When are you playing the young QB? You paid Keenum and Flacco big bucks. They were brought in to win games, not be bridges. Why was there a 'decision' audition with Siemien and Lynch? Lynch should have just been given the spot and sink or swim on his own. Is there going to be a similar 'decision' contest next year? Or are they paying big bucks to Flacco to sit? At some point the rebuild has to include a plan to draft a guy and give him the keys. Not sign guys who may or may not have some magic still and expect them to play a couple years at a serviceable while your high draft pick sits IMHO.
I think true rebuilds involve a young quarterback and a veteran back up with no delusions of grandeur.
I don’t think we can excuse John Elway’s failures as a rebuilding process. He needs to do a better job of identifying quarterback talent and coaching talent as well.
Negs are Cowardly Acts of Nonsense. I won’t Back Down.No Matter How Stupid Your Comments Are!Still Not Backing Down!!!
because no team puts a rookie who has never played in a pro style offense as the starter when you have a more experienced and AT THAT POINT BETTER QB on the team...just as much as the fans want to see wins...the players want to win more, they are competitive, they have worked all their lives to get o this point, they want to win...you put a qb who isn't ready, who is clearly not as good as the older vet as the starter you are signling to the other players you really don't care if the team wins...it is a moral killer
Lock may be the franchise QB, but you don't play a rookie when you have a veteran qb who can still play
Then why do they keep signing vets who they think can still play? I can see if it's a Josh McCown type of guy that nobody expects to last more than 1 season as a starter. But they signed Keenum to a multi year deal, and then Flacco to a multi year deal expecting both to perform at a high level. Again, at some point, the plan has to be the rookie.
A rookie shouldn't be 'forced' into the roll. It should be the plan to play him. Flacco isn't the reason they're losing, but he isn't making a deep playoff run either. So winning 7 or 8 games and picking in the late teens or early 20's doesn't do much from a rebuild standpoint.
if he can get the o-line and the qB spot we ae a very competivie team
oakland raders gm
latavis murray trade bait