allen scares nobody yet he's constantly double teamed because hes un-guardable one on one. sutton has broken out and is good but he still isn't as good as keenan, he doesn't take over games like keenan has his entire career. who had better production last season. this has been an "off season" for the offense as a whole, lots to do with pass protection and rivers not playing great.
nobody unbiased would agree with you that sutton is better than keenan allen at this point.
sutton also has more opportunity for production because the rest of the weapons in the passing game are virtually non existent.
gordon and AA are better than lindsay and freeman, lindsay is a pretty good runner but not so much in the passing game. AA has to be the best pass catching back in the league right now (better than even CM in the passing game) and he can run it well too. gordon has sucked coming out of the gate but a lot of that is due to holding out, he's gotten better as time has gone on and he has proven to be a very good back. you are ignoring all these guys total career and just going by what has happened this year alone to formulate your opinion because it suits your argument.
i mean i could argue that joey bosa is better than von miller using the same reasoning but that would be ignorant to ignore how good he has been over the years.
henry vs fant isn't even a debate right now. speed doesn't matter if you simply cannot make the plays. Henry is easily a top 5 ELITE TE in the game when healthy.
lets rehash, keenan allen, hunter henry, mike williams, AA, and even melvin gordon are all legit threats in the passing game.
denver has sutton as their only legit threat in their passing game right now
gordon and AA are better than lindsay and freeman but lindsay is definitely a threat in the running game.
somehow considering all that i'm supposed to believe that Denver has more talent on offense?
hey, you can believe whatever you want to i suppose, no matter how homer it is. pretty funny though when you think about it.