Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 125

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,370

    Bolles 5th year option Declined

    Controversial topic, but I know there are many people that have been down on Bolles for years, but has his improvements, durability and athleticism finally come to a point where he has earned it thanks to a year under Mike Munchak's guidance?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5,360
    This should be fun!

    - Option will be for $11m. Guaranteed if injured.
    - Some want him cut today
    - just read article proposing signing him to an extension.
    Example given was 3yr/ $21m. Front loaded to take the sting out of final if needed. Would he take less?

    Only Munchak truly has the insight to say if he is worth it.

    My first inclination would be try the extend him. Preferably less then_$7m per. But I know I am in the minority in thinking he will be better this year. Not great but better.

    To answer the original question. Yes I would

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Red 98 - Red 98
    Posts
    15,411
    There's no need to if he'll sign without using the option right? Use the option and you gotta pay him like he's elite. You don't want to do that do you

    I don't know how it all works but if you can avoid paying him ........or overpaying him, I don't mind
    Red 98

    Kareem rises to the top

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    511
    Well, if this draft showed anything, it's that they're still willing to give Bolles a chance. Without other options, kinda have to stick with Bolles for now. Give him one more year to try and prove he can be a legit blindside blocker for a legit franchise QB, and if he fails, then we can move on.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,365
    The only type of person I would assume who would support this is someone who is hell bent on trying to justify jumping out the window in their post draft analysis of the pick years ago heralding it as a great move. There is no reason you are giving Bolles a contract worth 11 million for one year after the tape he has put up in his 3 years in the NFL. If he hits the free agent market and someone else wants to even considering offering him anything in that ballpark, have him, go nuts. You can replace what you get from Bolles in rounds 1, 2, or 3 in most years of the NFL draft, and you can spend that money elsewhere, no way would you allocate that type of one year deal to Bolles. Elway seems to give him an easy path to the starting gig year after year after he puts up terrible tape, so who knows, maybe he will do it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by johnlimburg View Post
    Elway seems to give him an easy path to the starting gig year after year after he puts up terrible tape, so who knows, maybe he will do it.
    This is what I don't get. Elway has shown he's willing to move on from first round mistakes. Shane Ray was gone quick. Paxton got the kicked to the curb and only got to start a handful of games. Yet Elway has yet to try find an upgrade over Bolles.

    Has Bolles been significantly better at his position than Ray or Lynch were? No. Yet the FO has made little attempt at improvement at LT. Why Bolles' leash has been as long as it has is odd, to say the least.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,365
    Quote Originally Posted by Megalodon30 View Post
    This is what I don't get. Elway has shown he's willing to move on from first round mistakes. Shane Ray was gone quick. Paxton got the kicked to the curb and only got to start a handful of games. Yet Elway has yet to try find an upgrade over Bolles.

    Has Bolles been significantly better at his position than Ray or Lynch were? No. Yet the FO has made little attempt at improvement at LT. Why Bolles' leash has been as long as it has is odd, to say the least.
    I think it just feels like longer because we are constantly exposed to Bolles and his bad play. All those guys you mentioned, Shane Ray, Paxton Lynch, Sylvester Williams, they were either rotational guys or barely played, so they weren't at the forefront of our thinking. But, all of them played 4 seasons here before moving on without having the 5th year option used. Bolles will play his 4th year this year and probably be hitting the road as well.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Denver, Colorado, United States
    Posts
    21,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Megalodon30 View Post
    This is what I don't get. Elway has shown he's willing to move on from first round mistakes. Shane Ray was gone quick. Paxton got the kicked to the curb and only got to start a handful of games. Yet Elway has yet to try find an upgrade over Bolles.

    Has Bolles been significantly better at his position than Ray or Lynch were? No. Yet the FO has made little attempt at improvement at LT. Why Bolles' leash has been as long as it has is odd, to say the least.
    Hes probably a good locker room guy, and a high effort guy. Why not give him one last go round this year and see if it all comes together? We aren't winning the SB this year, this is a development year. Let them compete and see where the chips fall.

    Hooray, beer!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    13,817
    Quote Originally Posted by Megalodon30 View Post
    This is what I don't get. Elway has shown he's willing to move on from first round mistakes. Shane Ray was gone quick. Paxton got the kicked to the curb and only got to start a handful of games. Yet Elway has yet to try find an upgrade over Bolles.

    Has Bolles been significantly better at his position than Ray or Lynch were? No. Yet the FO has made little attempt at improvement at LT. Why Bolles' leash has been as long as it has is odd, to say the least.
    Sometimes fans and coaches have very different perspectives on a player. I remember multiple times most of the posters on these forums where hard bashing Bolles on a play only to see the coaches say something was supposed to happen that meant it was not 100% on Bolles. A RB chip that did not happen, TE help that did not come.

    I do think the coaches realize Bolles needs to play better. Lots of football people said Bolles issues are correctable...just the question is does Bolles have the ability to correct his issues?

    Part of the problem with OT is pretty much only guys with questions marks become available. There are exceptions like cap dump trades or a team not willing to pay a guy so they trade him but more often than not the OT that become available have some kind of question mark.

    I do not think the Broncos are giving Bolles all this time because they have feelings about the pick they made...I just think options at OT are slim.

    It will be very interesting to see if the Broncos pick up the 5th year option or not.
    A good plan put into motion today is better than the ideal plan that is always coming sometime in the future.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Mile High Stadium
    Posts
    10,031
    Quote Originally Posted by Megalodon30 View Post
    This is what I don't get. Elway has shown he's willing to move on from first round mistakes. Shane Ray was gone quick. Paxton got the kicked to the curb and only got to start a handful of games. Yet Elway has yet to try find an upgrade over Bolles.

    Has Bolles been significantly better at his position than Ray or Lynch were? No. Yet the FO has made little attempt at improvement at LT. Why Bolles' leash has been as long as it has is odd, to say the least.
    As bad as Bolles has been he is a much better player than Lynch.
    Lynch got beat out by a 7th rd draft pick for the hardest position in all of sports.

    Ray is a better comparison but I would give Bolles the nod because he has stayed healthy.

    All 3 were bad picks. I think Elway should not give him a 5th year option.
    If he has a great season he can always be tagged or try to extend him before the season is over.
    He most likely will be average, and not worth the investment. Let him walk and get the compensatory pick in 2022. Find his replacement in 2021 draft.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by johnlimburg View Post
    I think it just feels like longer because we are constantly exposed to Bolles and his bad play. All those guys you mentioned, Shane Ray, Paxton Lynch, Sylvester Williams, they were either rotational guys or barely played, so they weren't at the forefront of our thinking. But, all of them played 4 seasons here before moving on without having the 5th year option used. Bolles will play his 4th year this year and probably be hitting the road as well.
    Lynch didn't make it 4 years. He was cut after his second year. Though for all his woes, it's safe to say Bolles is a much harder worker than Lynch ever was.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    14,365
    Quote Originally Posted by Megalodon30 View Post
    Lynch didn't make it 4 years. He was cut after his second year. Though for all his woes, it's safe to say Bolles is a much harder worker than Lynch ever was.
    My bad, yeah 2 years. I swear we all argued for more than 2 off-seasons about Lynch, they really gave up on him quickly. What a horrible pick.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    DENVER
    Posts
    7,665
    Absolutely. It's 11m, which will be the 16th-20th highest 2021 cap hit for LTs. That's cheap, even for a below average starter. Further, if he improves then it's a complete bargain and if he sucks, well then you can just cut him because the 5th year option is only guaranteed for injury and Bolles has never missed a game due to injury.

    It's pretty close to a no-brainer. The 5th year option gives flexibility and an opportunity to address the position from multiple angles. No option means we go into 2021 with no Bolles, no Wilkinson, no Rodgers, and likely a draft pick in the 20s.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    15,464
    I think Allbright also suggested the idea of signing him to a lower end deal. If Beachum made 8y last year, let's say Bolles gets a 3y 27m deal. This is all dependent on the idea that Munchak gives his seal of approval for Bolles. This also allows you more flexibility in taking a rookie, and giving them the ability to grow into the role properly. If the third year is essentially an option year, it's a viable financial strategy.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    2,397
    Quote Originally Posted by the0rangecrush View Post
    I think Allbright also suggested the idea of signing him to a lower end deal. If Beachum made 8y last year, let's say Bolles gets a 3y 27m deal. This is all dependent on the idea that Munchak gives his seal of approval for Bolles. This also allows you more flexibility in taking a rookie, and giving them the ability to grow into the role properly. If the third year is essentially an option year, it's a viable financial strategy.
    That is a solid plan.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •