Originally posted by Farrior
Worst Superbowl Ever!!!
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorA bronco fan crying about the refs and ignores calls that went SEA's way... Oh how did Denver make it to the AFCCG, Nuff said....
Oh I guess Stevens didn't fumble either, I guess he just made 3 steps and didn't catch it, ya, we'll ignore that even tho the Steelers could of ran it back or had great field position.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BroncosZBlitzHow do you know he had possession? They only showed one replay, and while he had his feet down, it wasn't necessary the ball was firmly in his hand.
I know he had the ball took three steps then fumbled but I guess you refuse to see it cause you want believe this Refs ****.
You know what you are..........................HYPOCRITE
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by paysonThe refs where horrible, the game was boring and even the commercials SUCKED.
Worst Superbowl Ever!!!!
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."sigpic
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SM19It only looks like a fumble in slow-motion replay. As with another correct no-fumble call in the Rose Bowl several weeks ago, if you watch it at full speed, you can see that Stevens had the ball for only a fraction of a second, not long enough to establish possession.
I'd really recommend that you treat posters here with more respect. Unless it's a ban you're shooting for, that is; if that's the case, you're doing just fine.
What a bunch of fn hypocrites.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SM19If you'd read any of my other posts on this topic (an excellent alternative to pretending that you know what I think), you'd know that I've defended as correct a couple of the calls that others on this board disagree with, namely the Roethlisberger touchdown and the offensive pass interference. That still leaves the phantom hold, which no matter how you slice it was either a bad call, or an inexcusible inconsistency.
Haggens beats his man and the guy GRABS and HOLDS on to his chest and back and almost takes him down AGAIN, if he didn't hold it was a sack..... I wish you could prove it wasn't a hold and show where the Phantom was???
Why wasn't Sea called for block in the back on that Ben INT, they hit Ben in the back???
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorHow do know he wasn't holding on that one play, he held the front and back and pulled him down, preventing a sack? How do you know Ben wasn't in, even tho it looked like he had the ball over the line in the air and even landed on the line...
I know he had the ball took three steps then fumbled but I guess you refuse to see it cause you want believe this Refs ****.
You know what you are..........................HYPOCRITE
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BroncosZBlitzFine, four how do you know calls against the Seahawks vs one against the Steelers, still blatantly one-sided. Result ******************* championship for the Squeelers
The only bad calls were the Stevens fumble and the Hasslebeck 15 yard block call on the INT.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorPhanton hold??? Not if you know anything about football..... I saw that before it was even called, that's how bad it was, just watch NFL NETWORK they show the replay and even say it's holding..
Haggens beats his man and the guy GRABS and HOLDS on to his chest and back and almost takes him down AGAIN, if he didn't hold it was a sack..... I wish you could prove it wasn't a hold and show where the Phantom was???
Why wasn't Sea called for block in the back on that Ben INT, they hit Ben in the back???
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorSteelers won fair and square, tune into NFL NETWORK and watch them talk about the FN game.
The only bad calls were the Stevens fumble and the Hasslebeck 15 yard block call on the INT.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorSteelers won fair and square, tune into NFL NETWORK and watch them talk about the FN game.
The only bad calls were the Stevens fumble and the Hasslebeck 15 yard block call on the INT.
So you are saying the pass interference and the Ben R's touchdown was not questionable?
I think I could sell you "rainwater" in Texas, if you don't think that some of the calls were favoring the Steelers.
Ever since the Troy P. call in Indy, which I admit was an interception, the refs have given the Steelers all the questionable calls. That is not fair and you and I both know that.Go Broncos!!! - Hosea 10:12
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BroncosZBlitzWhat's the matter, repeating the argument because you could find no other examples? I thought so.
I guess the broncos made the AFCCG with correct Ref calls?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FarriorEvery call you bring up can be backed up with FACTS, you can't back up anything...
I guess the broncos made the AFCCG with correct Ref calls?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by broncos4everSo you are saying the pass interference and the Ben R's touchdown was not questionable?
I think I could sell you "rainwater" in Texas, if you don't think that some of the calls were favoring the Steelers.
Ever since the Troy P. call in Indy, which I admit was an interception, the refs have given the Steelers all the questionable calls. That is not fair and you and I both know that.
That so called phantom call was so obviously holding, so much so you could see it before he threw the ball, I'm sorry you don't know the rules but just because he made a completion after the hold dons't mean it's questionable. I won't even talk about this cause it's not even close to going the other way.
Those are the supposed game changing calls and they hold little water, IMO.... I love how the obvious Stevens fumble gets ignored....
Comment
-
Comment