Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Grew up in Aurora! live in Bothell, Wa.
    Posts
    2,279

    Moulds to Denver!

    I just read that E Moulds has major intrest in Denver followed by KC and the Jets.I would be excited to see him come to Denver as long as we dont pay an arm and leg for him..I also read he is conidered a WR in the same was as Eddy Mac was,sort of a clutch kind of WR..What do you all think about it?I am sure the topic has come up before here but it seems more real now I guess is why I am asking.

    Thanks for any input.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    nowhere fun
    Posts
    5,750
    Id like to see him here in denver. another solid reciever is what we need. do you have a link to the story, man?


    If you take what I have to say seriously, then I'm embarrassed for you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sharkdom of Snowdonia,Wales
    Posts
    15,000
    Quote Originally Posted by BANJOPICKER1
    I just read that E Moulds has major intrest in Denver followed by KC and the Jets.I would be excited to see him come to Denver as long as we dont pay an arm and leg for him..I also read he is conidered a WR in the same was as Eddy Mac was,sort of a clutch kind of WR..What do you all think about it?I am sure the topic has come up before here but it seems more real now I guess is why I am asking.

    Thanks for any input.
    Does this mean the Texans are now out of the race, because I read this yesterday:


    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/3749828.html

    Adopted Bronco - Emmanuel Sanders

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Broncoville, TN
    Posts
    9,960
    Well since this is in the Rumor mill, I have given Mike Shanahan the go ahead to sign Eric Moulds for the right dollar amount. He would be excellent in Denver. I have to disagree with you Banjo.......Eric Moulds is a much better reciever than Eddy Mac. Eddy Mac was good.
    Emancipate your mind!
    The People's Poster

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Sharkdom of Snowdonia,Wales
    Posts
    15,000
    Quote Originally Posted by Emancipator
    Well since this is in the Rumor mill, I have given Mike Shanahan the go ahead to sign Eric Moulds for the right dollar amount. He would be excellent in Denver. I have to disagree with you Banjo.......Eric Moulds is a much better reciever than Eddy Mac. Eddy Mac was good.
    I would imagine they are both good as they both are E Ms and I'm sure you would agree anyone named EM has got to be the best

    Adopted Bronco - Emmanuel Sanders

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Broncoville, TN
    Posts
    9,960
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaws
    I would imagine they are both good as they both are E Ms and I'm sure you would agree anyone named EM has got to be the best
    I sure do!




    *E-Man*
    Emancipate your mind!
    The People's Poster

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    michigan
    Posts
    959
    Quote Originally Posted by Emancipator
    Well since this is in the Rumor mill, I have given Mike Shanahan the go ahead to sign Eric Moulds for the right dollar amount. He would be excellent in Denver. I have to disagree with you Banjo.......Eric Moulds is a much better reciever than Eddy Mac. Eddy Mac was good.

    I am all for bringing Moulds on board because it would keep us from wasting a first round pick on a receiver. To say that moulds is better then eddie mac is a farce!!! First off I know for sure that moulds dosnt run block like Eddie did because the only player in the league right now that blocks from the WR posistion like Edddie is Hines Ward. Secondly Eddie mac was never suspended for pretty much being a selfish brat. Eddie mac was the consamate profesional and would do anything it took to help his team win games including going over the middle and constantly getting rocked but continuesley holding onto the ball. There is much more that goes into being a good reciever then catches, yards, and td's & Eddie mac was great at everything that there arn't stats for.

    Thanks to dbfan2007 for sig

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Grew up in Aurora! live in Bothell, Wa.
    Posts
    2,279
    This is why I put this in the rumor mill area,I just found this on KFFL..Funny how the rumor mill works...



    Broncos | Team not interested in Moulds?
    Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:27:03 -0800

    Bill Williamson, of the Denver Post, reports even though the Denver Broncos are one of the teams mentioned as having interest from Buffalo Bills WR Eric Moulds, there are indications the Broncos are not interested. The only way Denver would be attracted to Moulds is if his price tag was much lower than it currently is which doesn't appear likely.

    http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Medford, MA
    Posts
    6,354
    Quote Originally Posted by BANJOPICKER1
    This is why I put this in the rumor mill area,I just found this on KFFL..Funny how the rumor mill works...



    Broncos | Team not interested in Moulds?
    Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:27:03 -0800

    Bill Williamson, of the Denver Post, reports even though the Denver Broncos are one of the teams mentioned as having interest from Buffalo Bills WR Eric Moulds, there are indications the Broncos are not interested. The only way Denver would be attracted to Moulds is if his price tag was much lower than it currently is which doesn't appear likely.

    http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl
    This sucks as I would like Moulds as a 2nd/3rd receiver.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,971
    This all seems eerily familiar.....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •